search for: githubs

Re your point 3: Because you have managed to create a GitHub version of your repository that is not a fork of https://github.com/rforge/ecdat, but its own independent repository, contacting GitHub support might not be the right way forward. Note that https://github.com/rforge is simply a read-only mirror of the complete R-Forge repository (and at least to me it is unclear of whether GitHub itself

Whereas it is true that one has to contact GitHub to detach a GitHub repository, it really is no problem (or at least was no problem in 2016). I wanted to do so when I took over the maintainer role of LaplacesDemon which only remained on GitHub as a fork on some other person's private account. So I forked and then contacted GitHub support and simply asked them to remove the "forked

> On 26 Jun 2019, at 17:25, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > > R-Forge is mirrored on Github; see https://github.com/rforge/ecdat, for example. That shows 418 commits in its history; presumably that's the full R-forge history. I think that's newer than Michael Friendly's gist. > > So I suspect (but haven't tried to do this) that

Hey guys, This is the final list of the new maintainers of each plugin. We need two more things to do: First please the owners of the repos add the rest of the maintainers. Second I will add a note on each rails/plugin mentioning this repos updates. So from now on, if someone else is interested in helping/contributing please send a message to the appropriate repo owner. verification

????? Thanks.? I'm still having problems: ??? ??????? 1.? I went to "github.com" and logged in with my standard GitHub account ??? ??????? 2.? Then I clicked "+" in the upper right, just left of my GitHub ID icon, and selected "Import a repository", as Lionel suggested. ??? ??????? 3.? " Your old repository?s clone URL" =

????? Thanks to Duncan, Lionel and Henrik for their quick replies. I have further questions: ??? ?? ???? 1.? Will GitHub automatically transfer the commits I made to R-Forge in the past couple of days?? R-Forge is now at Rev. 420, and GitHub is still at 418.? Will 419 and 420 be automatically mirrored onto "https://github.com/rforge/ecdat" sometime in the next 24 hours or so?? Is

Henrik's advice is all good. I would say his idea of the final commit of a README pointer is better than deleting things at R-forge; there is likely old information out there somewhere pointing to R-forge as a location for Ecdat development, and any bug reports or discussion on R-forge will not have been copied over to Github. Duncan Murdoch On 28/06/2019 4:14 a.m., Henrik Singmann

I noticed today that there are some commits that get pushed upstream, but not to master or any other branch either. For example: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d272d3a1885a82d6ccf5b3d5b6841f79d81e24e5 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6762d53b66d9de18825f09f43c3d6c2b3ea95913 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/80f81325b8e8f0bed81a28dffb8eba526002f2b3

I'm diverging:? Now I get: >>> git pull ssh: Could not resolve hostname github.com:sbgraves237: nodename nor servname provided, or not known fatal: Could not read from remote repository. Please make sure you have the correct access rights and the repository exists. ????? ** With .git/config as follows: [core] ??? repositoryformatversion = 0 ??? filemode = true ??? bare =

Hi, To be able to validate CMake changes in the Github mirror I propose we add github actions to the repo and start building with CMake. https://github.com/features/actions [https://github.githubassets.com/images/modules/site/social-cards/actions.png]<https://github.com/features/actions> Features • GitHub Actions · GitHub<https://github.com/features/actions> GitHub is where people

Hi, Henrik et al.: ????? What's your favorite documentation on how to make two GitHub projects from one containing two packages? ????? Currently, "github.com/sbgraves237/Ecdat" consists primarily of a directory "pkg" with subdirectories "Ecdat" and "Ecfun" containing the two packages.? I need to know how to do the following: ??? ??????? 1.?

On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 9:46 PM Joshua Ulrich <josh.m.ulrich at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 6:06 PM Spencer Graves > <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, Henrik et al.: > > > > > > What's your favorite documentation on how to make two GitHub > > projects from one containing two packages? > >

Sean, I can create html, pdf and epub, then put them on <https://github.com/Jonathan2251/lbd/tree/gh-pages>. The uvbook example as below can click the pdf link and pop up a download window while I cannot. The uvbook link is put on http://username.github.com/... while the "make gh-pages" put them on https://github.com/username/...  How can I have the download link like uvbook

On 26/06/2019 1:38 p.m., Spencer Graves wrote: > ????? Thanks.? I'm still having problems: > > > ??? ??????? 1.? I went to "github.com" and logged in with my standard > GitHub account > > > ??? ??????? 2.? Then I clicked "+" in the upper right, just left of my > GitHub ID icon, and selected "Import a repository", as Lionel

> But I don't think there's a reason we couldn't point the bots at the github > mirrors. I'm not sure if they lag the official mirror though. The GitHub mirrors located at [1] are updated hourly which is not frequent enough There seems to be an LLVM organisation registered on GitHub but it doesn't seem to be in use. [1] https://github.com/llvm-mirror/ [2]

Please forgive the incorrect threading on this reply to Tom Stellard's RFC. > I would like to start using GitHub Actions[1] for CI testing on the release/* > branches. As far as I know we don't have any buildbots listening to the > release branches, and I think GitHub Actions are a good way for us to > quickly bring-up some CI jobs there. Personally, I feel that Tom's

In a previous discussion, one other suggestion had been to migrate all the bugzilla bugs to a separate initially-private "bug archive" repository in github. This has a few benefits: 1. If the migration is messed up, the repo can be deleted, and the process run again, until we get a result we like. 2. The numbering can be fully-controlled. Once the bugs are migrated to *some* github

Hi, I wanted to continue discussing the plan to migrate from Bugzilla to Github. It was suggested that I start a new thread and give a summary of the proposal and what has changed since it was originally proposed in October. == Here is the original proposal: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-October/136162.html == What has changed: * You will be able to subscribe to notifications

I still need answer to my question about how to make sure that libcxx and libcxxabi are also built after enabling them, but I have another problem right now. I want to know how to link third-party libraries into my code using the lld linker. I have this code: https://github.com/DragonOsman/currency_converter

On 26 December 2017 at 00:00, Juan Telleria <jtelleriar at gmail.com> wrote: > Maybe I'm new, and forgive my ignorance, but maybe in the future (~ X years > from now) the R Project could be managed entirely from github, by doing I strongly disagree. Are you aware that github is a commercial company, github inc. [1] ? What about gitlab? or Microsoft's codeplex? There are other