search for: git9

...> "we" (nouveau developers) generally ask for a git bisection is because > we don't know or track specific distributions. Although your search has > narrowed the problem down (thanks for that!), we don't know how big the > difference is between kernel-3.16.0-0.rc0.git9.1.fc21 and > kernel-3.16.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc21. Is the difference literally just that > one patch? Or were there more patches to nouveau or drm that might have > been the culprit? So far I haven't succeeded in finding the exact > differences between the two kernels. Git bisect on...

...sassin.net QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Running Fedora 21 with kernels from https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/rawhide-kernel-nodebug/ (tracking 3.18 development). I have kernel-3.18.0-0.rc0.git1.2.fc22.1.x86_64 , kernel-3.18.0-0.rc0.git8.2.fc22.1.x86_64 and kernel-3.18.0-0.rc0.git9.2.fc22.1.x86_64 installed . kernel-3.18.0-0.rc0.git1.2.fc22.1.x86_64 boots fine on my system, the other two do not. On git1 I get boot framebuffer output on both heads, then X starts properly. On git8 and git9, I get boot framebuffer only on one head, then both screens go into power saving mode wh...

...uot;we" (nouveau developers) generally ask for a git bisection is because >> we don't know or track specific distributions. Although your search has >> narrowed the problem down (thanks for that!), we don't know how big the >> difference is between kernel-3.16.0-0.rc0.git9.1.fc21 and >> kernel-3.16.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc21. Is the difference literally just that >> one patch? Or were there more patches to nouveau or drm that might have >> been the culprit? So far I haven't succeeded in finding the exact >> differences between the two kernels. G...

...(nouveau developers) generally ask for a git bisection is because >>> we don't know or track specific distributions. Although your search has >>> narrowed the problem down (thanks for that!), we don't know how big the >>> difference is between kernel-3.16.0-0.rc0.git9.1.fc21 and >>> kernel-3.16.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc21. Is the difference literally just that >>> one patch? Or were there more patches to nouveau or drm that might have >>> been the culprit? So far I haven't succeeded in finding the exact >>> differences between th...

...t;> Excusez-moi, >>> BROKEN == The display remains OFF. >>> >> >> More precisely stated it looks like this: >> >> - Last kernel with working resume/thaw >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=538208 >> kernel-3.16.0-0.rc0.git9.1.fc21 >> 2014-06-13 >> >> - First kernel with broken resume/thaw >> kernel-3.16.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc21 >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=538244 >> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/pkgs/kernel/patch-3.15-git10.xz/f98fb42e79c966f8e139...