Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "git20190206".
2019 Nov 08
1
current state of pxelinux for UEFI...
...ry packages in Debian are:
>
> _ extlinux
> _ isolinux
> _ pxelinux
> _ syslinux
> _ syslinux-common
> _ syslinux-efi
> _ syslinux-utils
>
okay thanks a lot for explaining that :-)
So for the record at the moment:
I've tried the syslinux.efi from
syslinux-efi_6.04~git20190206.bf6db5b4+dfsg1-1_all.deb
and ldlinux.e64 from
syslinux-common_6.04~git20190206.bf6db5b4+dfsg1-1_all.deb
On my hardware from AsRock (J4105) and Gigabyte (J1900) the following
recent versions of pxelinux/syslinux:
1) debian 6.04~git20190206.bf6db5b4+dfsg1-1
2) vanilla git master at the moment
3)...
2024 Jan 20
1
Running VMware ESXi network installer via syslinux/menu
...oot signature 0x2, bailing out
> Booting kernel failed: Bad file number
> """
Which syslinux version?
What is the APPEND for mboot.efi ?
(In order to boot The Hurd on Devuan I had to edit mboot as it handled
arguments differently from grub. This is published as version
3:6.04~git20190206.bf6db5b4+dfsg1-3+devuan6 in Devuan repo. So it
might be related here, or not)
Ralph.
>
> Secure boot is disabled.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> The reason why it would be nice using PXE and syslinux here is because we
> have this automation set up where we can choose from the menu wha...
2024 Jan 21
1
Running VMware ESXi network installer via syslinux/menu
...ries to load anything related to
ESX8TEST.cfg, I guess that's because it errors out before even looking
at the append command
Marki
>
> (In order to boot The Hurd on Devuan I had to edit mboot as it handled
> arguments differently from grub. This is published as version
> 3:6.04~git20190206.bf6db5b4+dfsg1-3+devuan6 in Devuan repo. So it
> might be related here, or not)
>
> Ralph.
>
>> Secure boot is disabled.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> The reason why it would be nice using PXE and syslinux here is because we
>> have this automation set up whe...
2019 Jun 08
2
PXELINUX gets stuck when receiving non-PXE traffic
On 6/6/19 8:16 AM, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote:
>
>> the PXELINUX log line is
>> printed (PXELINUX 6.04 lwIP 6.04-pre3 Copyright (C) 1994-2015 H. Peter
>> Anvin et al),
>
> (snip)
>
> FWIW, the official binaries from 6.04-pre2 and 6.04-pre3 are not good
> for troubleshooting.
>
> Is the same behavior present when testing with other versions? I would
2019 Nov 07
4
current state of pxelinux for UEFI...
Dear gentlemen,
I think I'd better start another thread for this...
thanks to Ady Ady and Gregory Lee Bartholomew for their responses to
my early question.
Just for the record, my fresh experience with PXElinux 6.x follows:
syslinux.efi version 6.03 does boot to the extent that it shows a
prompt, but if I provide it with a CFG file containing several
labels, no matter what label I type
2019 Nov 14
2
current state of pxelinux for UEFI...
If they are useful, then one should note where they can be found
and how to extract them for anyone not using a Debian-based distro.
Saying just that they are in the Debian Testing repo, doesn't mean
much to a non-Debian-er...
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 09:50:40PM +0000, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote:
> > Do note that not everyone is running a Debian based system,
> > so "the
2019 Jul 18
0
PXELINUX gets stuck when receiving non-PXE traffic
...more up-to-date than official upstream 6.04-pre1).
>> Please note that you need to replace _all_ binaries (e.g. *.c32), not
>> just lpxelinux.0, from the same exact build/version/package.
Thanks for letting me know. I have repeated my tests with 6.04-pre1 and
Debian unstable?s 3:6.04~git20190206.bf6db5b4+dfsg1-1. Both versions
exhibit the same problem.
> Indeed; it would also be a good idea to test both pxelinux.0 and lpxelinux.0.
> They access the PXE stack in very different ways, so it is a good idea to
> check both.
I can confirm that using pxelinux.0 instead of lpxelinux.0 d...
2020 Oct 14
0
efi64/syslinux.efi with http support like bios/lpxelinux.0
Hello everybody,
I am looking for the efi64/syslinux.efi with IP support like the
bios/lpxelinux.0 version has.
I am using debian buster with:
syslinux-efi 3:6.04~git20190206.bf6db5b4+dfsg1-1 all
collection of bootloaders (UEFI bootloader)
Thank you in advance,
Kind regards,
Jelle de Jong
2020 Nov 03
2
syslinux.efi does not seem to support HTTP like lpxelinux.0 does?
...ou for the
great tech!
However it seems the syslinux.efi does not support HTTP / IP?
How can I get efi boot load syslinux with an IP stack?
# dpkg -S /usr/lib/SYSLINUX.EFI/efi64/syslinux.efi
syslinux-efi: /usr/lib/SYSLINUX.EFI/efi64/syslinux.efi
# dpkg -l syslinux-efi
ii syslinux-efi 3:6.04~git20190206.bf6db5b4+dfsg1-1
Kind regards,
Jelle de Jong
2024 Jan 19
2
Running VMware ESXi network installer via syslinux/menu
Hello,
So I'm running syslinux.efi
Which loads menu.c32
Which is supposed to start ESXi's bootx64.efi/mboot.efi
But that gives
"""
Loading mboot.efi... ok
Invalid Boot signature 0x2, bailing out
Booting kernel failed: Bad file number
"""
Secure boot is disabled.
Thoughts?
The reason why it would be nice using PXE and syslinux here is because
we have
2019 Jul 19
2
PXELINUX gets stuck when receiving non-PXE traffic
...ficial upstream 6.04-pre1).
>>> Please note that you need to replace _all_ binaries (e.g. *.c32), not
>>> just lpxelinux.0, from the same exact build/version/package.
>
> Thanks for letting me know. I have repeated my tests with 6.04-pre1 and
> Debian unstable?s 3:6.04~git20190206.bf6db5b4+dfsg1-1. Both versions
> exhibit the same problem.
>
>> Indeed; it would also be a good idea to test both pxelinux.0 and lpxelinux.0.
>> They access the PXE stack in very different ways, so it is a good idea to
>> check both.
>
> I can confirm that using pxe...