search for: gild

...fetchmail to imap the existing mail to the new server. At some point, I developed a problem with my partition map being semi-ignored. Mail is stored in multiple places, and I'm not sure why or entirely clear how it ended up there. My log is overflowing with entries such as? Jan 10 15:44:57 gilded-bat dovecot[65]: auth(default): od(john_doe_com): unable to find partition for tag=johndoe: using default mail location: /var/spool/imap/dovecot/mail ?referring to each of my defined partitions. Here's what I semi-understand. /etc/dovecot/partition_map.conf.default contains: default:/var/...

Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> writes: > Well, Dirk has said to have given his last reply on this thread. > I (as a member of R-core) am glad about people like Dirk who > take some of our load and helpfully answer such > questions/reports on R-devel. I am glad too. Thank you. My ultimate goal is to ensure that R works as well on FreeBSD as it does elsewhere.

...we have been trying for you to understand still stand: __what you insist is needed actually is not__. | Thank you for sticking with the thread, Sorry for coming through as pedantic but you (and we're now at what, six posts in and counting?) still start from the wrong (at least outside of the gilded confines of FreeBSD) premise. It. Just. Works. Just give us and the unknown-but-sometimes-estimated-to-be-in-the-millions of R users some credit. What is there __works__. Seriously. Debian folks are pendantic for technical excellence __and even they have no issue with per-package and local shar...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Here is a description of what I am trying to do (with Samba 3.0.2a & openldap 2.1.27): I have all my users populated into the LDAP with all the applicable attributes; Users can map drives to a server using LDAP as the authentication backend without issue. Where I am running into problems is bringing up a PDC using Samba w/LDAP. * I added

...ted I do not believe changing certificates on an hourly basis would have made much difference against an technically proficient attacker exploiting the weakness. It is well to recall how HB came to be. A misguided attempt at an improvement in protocol exchange which amounted to not much more than gilding-the-lily and which since has been discarded without noticeable loss. What prevents similarly motivated 'improvements' to an automated certificate authority from having equally damaging effects on the robustness of the the certificates that they provide? We trusted OpenSSL because it was...