search for: gigebyte

...IT currently (and the next incarnation is also likely to) pulls in an awful lot of fat LLVM libraries that cause a JIT-based compiler to be 8MB-up on x86. MIPS would be substantially larger than this due to its RISC instruction set. > I will use it on a MIPS PC Which have typically more than one Gigebyte memory. Anyway, I think I should spend some time to understand MC-JIT more. Thanks MK > James Molloy > Graduate Compiler Engineer, ARM Ltd. > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] >> On Behalf...

...the next incarnation is also likely to) pulls in an awful lot of fat LLVM libraries that cause a JIT-based compiler to be 8MB-up on x86. MIPS would be substantially larger than this due to its RISC instruction set. >>> >> I will use it on a MIPS PC Which have typically more than one Gigebyte >> memory. Anyway, I think I should spend some time to understand MC-JIT >> more. > > Excellent. You may wish to make sure that there's enough isa support for your target in the mips backend as well. There are definitely plenty of things in that target to work on while the res...

...ly (and the next incarnation is also likely to) pulls in an awful lot of fat LLVM libraries that cause a JIT-based compiler to be 8MB-up on x86. MIPS would be substantially larger than this due to its RISC instruction set. >> > I will use it on a MIPS PC Which have typically more than one Gigebyte > memory. Anyway, I think I should spend some time to understand MC-JIT > more. Excellent. You may wish to make sure that there's enough isa support for your target in the mips backend as well. There are definitely plenty of things in that target to work on while the rest of the JIT is c...

Hi, There are numerous emails flying around the list at the moment regarding the state of the JIT. In its current state it is infeasible to add support for another architecture (very difficult to say the least) - there are plans currently being formulated to deal with this and convert the JIT to the new MC architecture, which would allow much easier porting between platforms. Have a look for the

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Bruno Cardoso Lopes <bruno.cardoso at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 5:39 AM, Michael.Kang <blackfin.kang at gmail.com> wrote: >> I like to get the support of llvm runtime so that I can run some VM >> that depends on llvm. I googled porting keyword >> and also simply try to cross compile llvm. Just like