search for: gigant

Il giorno 18/mar/2013, alle ore 15:14, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> ha scritto: > Nicola Gigante <nicola.gigante at gmail.com> writes: > >> The error I get is the following: >> Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: >> "typeinfo for llvm::FoldingSetImpl", referenced from: >> typeinfo for llvm::FoldingSet<Type> in Program.o >> l...

I've discovered recently that something on my Centos 5.8 box (up to date) is hogging a ton of RAM. so a little while ago I sat and watched top for a while. it showed (sorry, I didn't take screen shots or write this down, so the numbers are a bit rough) that out of 8 gigs of swap, around 2 1/2 was in use, and all the RAM (except for the little the kernel keeps for itself) was in use

Nicola Gigante <nicola.gigante at gmail.com> writes: > The error I get is the following: > Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: > "typeinfo for llvm::FoldingSetImpl", referenced from: > typeinfo for llvm::FoldingSet<Type> in Program.o > ld: symbol(s) not found...

Nicola Gigante <nicola.gigante at gmail.com> writes: > Il giorno 18/mar/2013, alle ore 15:14, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> ha scritto: > >> Nicola Gigante <nicola.gigante at gmail.com> writes: >> >>> The error I get is the following: >>> Undefined symb...

Nicola Gigante <nicola.gigante at gmail.com> writes: >> Adding an option for enabling RTTI on the cmake build is trivial. Dunno >> about the `configure' build. You can try filing a feature request on >> Bugzilla. > > Ok, I've managed to refactor some code and remove uses of...

...1 >> #define PAGE_MAPPING_MOVABLE 0x2 >> +#define PAGE_MAPPING_REMOTE 0x4 > Uh. How do you know page->mapping would otherwise have bit 2 clear? > Who's guaranteeing that? > > This is an awfully big patch to the memory management code, buried in > the middle of a gigantic series which almost guarantees nobody would > look at it. I call shenanigans. Are you calling shenanigans on the patch submitter (which is gratuitous) or on the KVM maintainers/reviewers? It's not true that nobody would look at it. Of course no one from linux-mm is going to look at it,...

...1 >> #define PAGE_MAPPING_MOVABLE 0x2 >> +#define PAGE_MAPPING_REMOTE 0x4 > Uh. How do you know page->mapping would otherwise have bit 2 clear? > Who's guaranteeing that? > > This is an awfully big patch to the memory management code, buried in > the middle of a gigantic series which almost guarantees nobody would > look at it. I call shenanigans. Are you calling shenanigans on the patch submitter (which is gratuitous) or on the KVM maintainers/reviewers? It's not true that nobody would look at it. Of course no one from linux-mm is going to look at it,...

Hello I'm trying to link my project with llvm 3.2 libraries. I haven't touched the project for some months. Previously I used to link to an svn build of llvm 3.1 and everything worked fine. I've compiled llvm with ./configure --enable-libcpp --enable-cxx11 Currently I'm only using StringRef, SmallVector and FoldingSet, so I only link libLLVMSupport and libLLVMCore. Are they

Il giorno 18/mar/2013, alle ore 18:47, Óscar Fuentes ha scritto: > > You can try building LLVM with > > CXXFLAGS=-frtti configure .... > CXXFLAGS=-frtti make ... > > I'm not sure if CXXFLAGS takes precedence over the hard-coded -fno-rtti > in the makefiles, though. > > With the cmake build, you can try as above (but replacing `configure' > with

Hi all. I’ve heard a couple of times that some of the problems solved by various passes in the optimizer are indeed NP-hard, even though the instances are small enough to be tractable (and very quickly). Is this true? If so, which are these problems? Register allocation? Instruction scheduling? Are they solved exactly or by approximations? Or not solved at all (the need of solving them is

>>> >>> Great! Seems to be working fine for my usage and makes my configs 50% >>> smaller (which is gigantic improvement). Will do more testing though. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> A little bit offtopic, but what is the point of using imap/pop SNI? All clients want to connect to their own domain or what? -- Kaspars

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7246 Summary: max-size not working in 3.0.7 built from source with default configure Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

...} >> >> or >> >> local_name *.*.foo.bar { >> } >> >> so basically you can now use certificate name matching rules for >> local_name. It made most sense. > Great! Seems to be working fine for my usage and makes my configs 50% smaller > (which is gigantic improvement). Will do more testing though. > > Thanks! > > > > What about dovecot stopping processing new clients when reload is in progress > problem - is it possible to make it behave better? To minimize (or avoid) > "downtime". > > How to reproduce - ju...

Alguien sabe donde puedo encontrar algun datasheet gigante, de más de 5 gigas, para poder practicar con grandes volumenes de información? Lo que quiero es probar a cargarlos con h20 y crear modelos con ellos. Me gustaria sobretodo problemas de clasificación... Gracias Jesús [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

As an absolute beginner, still reading "Modern Applied Statistics with S" and exercising with its examples, I'm frequently stopped by what it looks to be R poor help system (or is it my gigantic ignorance?). I mean that using help many arguments of a command seems to be given for granted like for instance: ............................... ?lines lines(x, ...) ## Default S3 method: lines(x, y = NULL, type = "l", col = par("col"), lty = par("l...

...where I can pay them for this service, but now they are podcasting, but not the whole show. *sigh* So what to do.... My thinking is to capture the stream from local affiliate and time shift until I leave work. But how do I do this (I know how to use dump with mplayer for this) without getting one gigantic file? Anyone have any experience with this? Preston

...om the larger optimized > "package"? Can the original modules, now combined into the one .bc file, > get loaded individually? No, it's all or nothing. Once linked, they cannot be seperated (easily). However, especially when using the JIT, there is little overhead for running a gigantic program that only has 1% of the functions in it ever executed... > For example, using Java, suppose I wanted to use java.util.zip.CRC32 to > compute a checksum in a program. That class (module) is delivered to me > as a java.util.zip "package". That is, it is the result of run...

...ave 1Mb of register available to tank the load. Even I we had a good way to handle it in InstCombine, the backend would have no capability to generate something nice for it anyway. Most aggregates are small and there is no good excuse to not do anything to handle them because someone could generate gigantic ones that won't map nicely to the hardware anyway. By that logic, SROA should not exists as one could generate gigantic aggregate as well (in fact, SROA fail pretty badly on large aggregates). The second concern raised is for atomic/volatile, which needs to be handled by the optimizer diffe...

...clarify in the .rst files as I'm learning, but the code submission process is silent on how documentation changes make it into master. At this point, even CODE_OWNERS.TXT is silent on who is responsible for the doc directory. Pointers would be helpful. Thank you very much. -- --- John Byrd Gigantic Software 2321 E 4th Street Suite C #429 Santa Ana, CA 92705-3862 http://www.giganticsoftware.com T: (949) 892-3526 F: (206) 309-0850 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190613/615ff8c3/attachme...

...at the 1st level, another file for factor A at the 2nd level, and a 3rd file for factor A at the 3rd level. Then I have another file storing the age of those subjects. The analysis with the linear mixed model above would be done at each voxel separately. It seems impractical to create one gigantic file or matrix to feed into the above command line because of the big number of voxels. I'm not sure how to proceed in this case. Any suggestions would be highly appreciated. Also if I'm concerned about any potential violation of sphericity among the 3 levels of factor A, how can...