search for: giesen

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1963 --- Comment #5 from martin f. krafft <bugzilla.mindrot.org at pobox.madduck.net> --- With reference to http://bugs.debian.org/650512, which I just reopened, I am sorry to say that the bug persists in OpenSSH 6.0. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. You are watching someone on the CC list of the

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1733 Summary: Enhance support for QoS (ToS) by supporting DSCP/CS and adding option Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.4p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo:

Anyone aware of how to configure one call per line on a Cisco 7941/7961? The default behaviour is to have two calls per line button, and this is confusing for some of my users so I'd like to be able to have the 2nd call ring the second line button, rather than being shared with the first. I'm hoping this is something that is configurable in the XML or on the phone UI. Thanks Gary

Sorry for the crosspost (this was also posted to asterisk-at-uc-dot-org) but I haven't got a response. I have a cell phone added to a queue as a local extension (member => Local/299). I want the cell phone to be able to reject calls to the queue without the person sitting in the queue being hung up on, etc. The way my dialplan is set up, the person hits 1 to answer the call and any other

On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 11:35 PM Fabian Giesen via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > What is so complicated about these? Shouldn't they just correspond to > two compares + selects? > > To give a concrete example, x86 MIN[SP][SD] and MAX[SP][SD], > respectively, correspond exactly to > > MIN*: sel...

On 7/2/2018 3:16 PM, Sanjay Patel wrote: > I also agree that the per-element rotate for vectors is what we want for > this intrinsic. > > So I have this so far: > > declare i32 @llvm.catshift.i32(i32 %a, i32 %b, i32 %shift_amount) > declare <2 x i32> @llvm.catshift.v2i32(<2 x i32> %a, <2 x i32> %b, <2 x i32> %shift_amount) > > For

...ructure definitions and corresponding remarks from MSDN below (those are copy&pasted and I use outlook express, so it *may* contain fancy tags or something like that - I hope you can tolerate it, but I'm too lazy to clean it up right now :) So, keep up the excellent work on vorbis, Fabian Giesen ------ 1. WAVEFORMAT structure The WAVEFORMAT structure describes the format of waveform-audio data. Only format information common to all waveform-audio data formats is included in this structure. This structure has been superseded by the WAVEFORMATEX structure. typedef struct { WORD wForm...

...ar [suggests](http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-May/123310.html) removing tools that are only useful for testing LLVM from the binary LLVM+Clang distribution, noting tools like clang-check contribute significantly to the installed size. Feedback is being sought in that thread. * Fabien Giesen [started](http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-May/123292.html) a discussion on rotate instructions, suggesting that rotate intrinsics should be added. Sanjay Patel has some [interesting thoughts](http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-May/123383.html) on potential criteria or infor...

On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 at 16:59, Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri at gmail.com> wrote: > > It appears you need 'reassoc' on fmul/fadd: > https://godbolt.org/z/nuTzx2 Thanks very much, that was it. Either that or providing -enable-unsafe-fp-math to llc yielded FMAs. I didn't expect this since using FMAs here instead of mul/add appears to be safer (the reverse is unsafe). ~ Uday

Hi everyone! I recently ran into some interesting issues with generation of rotate instructions - the details are in the bug tracker (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37387 and related bugs) for those interested - and it brought up the issue of rotates in the IR again. Now this is a proposal that has been made (and been rejected) several times, but I've been told that this time round we

...ggest I've seen. Another potential benefit of a generic intrinsic is that it can replace target-specific intrinsics. PowerPC and x86 have those. ARM translates source-level target-specific intrinsics into regular IR, so that could use the intrinsic too. On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 2:53 AM, Fabian Giesen via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi everyone! > > I recently ran into some interesting issues with generation of rotate > instructions - the details are in the bug tracker ( > https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37387 and related bugs) for those > inter...

Alex, After looking into this a bit, it looks to me like the best thing to do for targets that do not natively support ISD::MINIMUM and ISD::MAXIMUM would be to fall back to a libcall, since implementing these operations in terms of existing operations is actually rather complicated. Do you think it would make sense to add builtin functions to compiler-rt to implement these operations, or is

Hello, My matrix multiplication code has variables allocated via double pointers on heap. The code is not getting vectorized. Following is the code. int **buffer_A = (int **)malloc(vecsize * sizeof(int *)); int **buffer_B = (int **)malloc(vecsize * sizeof(int *)); for(p = 0; p < vecsize; p++) { buffer_A[p] = (int *)malloc(vecsize * sizeof(int)); } for(p = 0; p < vecsize;

1. I'm not sure what you mean by "full vector" here - using the same shift distance for all lanes (as opposed to per-lane distances), or doing a treat-the-vector-as-bag-of-bits shift that doesn't have any internal lane boundaries? If the latter, that doesn't really help you much with implementing a per-lane rotate. I think the most useful generalization of a vector

( I don't know if it's allowed to ask such question, if not, please remind me. ) I know Intel implemented several static branch prediction mechanisms these years: * 80486 age: Always-not-take * Pentium4 age: Backwards Taken/Forwards Not-Taken * PM, Core2: Didn't use static prediction, randomly depending on what happens to be in corresponding BTB entry , according to agner's

I've tried a number of solutions, but I've been unable to get Asterisk working with streaming MOH without running into the "buffer" issue. I've tried using various combinations madplay, mpg123, mpg321. I've also tried streamplayer by itself, and in combination with play-fifo ( http://www.freeswitch.org/asterisk_stuff/play-fifo.c ) to try and eliminate the issue. For