search for: giddings

After some more screwing around with leaving and rejoining the ADS domain I was finally able to access a share with "valid users =" set to a domain group I was a member of. The _only_ change I made after this was to add yet another group to the valid users on the share and restart samba...after that I could no longer access the share. I removed the additional group, restarted samba and

Sorry to have so many questions but I seem to have quite a few mini problems with my first Xen setup. My xen server works fine with Powernow on the standard Kernel but with the Xen kernel it fails. Does anyone know why? Details below. With Standard Kernel powernow-k8: Found 2 Quad-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 8350 processors (8 cpu cores) (version 2.20.00) powernow-k8: 0 : fid 0x0

Hi there, I have another problem on WinXP SP2 with samba.3.0.20a. Somehow, in a random situation, once user logged onto the workstations, they were prompted with the winlogon.exe Fatal error + blue screen to death then self-reboot. When I checked out the log from windows, it said there's problem on msgina.dll from WinXP SP2. However, another user can successfully logon to the same workstation

Hi, I have little knowledge about Samba 4 and I need help. I have a Zentyal 5 server, which is based on Ubuntu 16.04 and Samba4. There are some issues with Samba access to certain shares, because there seems to be 2 different gid for group "Domain Users", gid 1901 and gid 2513. # wbinfo --gid-info 2513 ARDITI\domain users:x:2513: # wbinfo --gid-info 1901 ARDITI\domain users:x:1901:

On Wed, 27 Jun 2018 02:09:24 -0400 Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I think I have my Mac AD mappings wrong. The following link > https://support.apple.com/kb/PH26272?viewlocale=en_ME&locale=en_ME, > says: > > > On a computer that's configured to use Directory Utility's Active > > Directory connector, you can specify an Active

Hi all, I am new to Asterik. Ia m trying to compile the source with the latest asterisk-1.6.2.0 these are the issues I am getting. initially,I got mkdir: cannot create directory `/var/lib/asterisk' than after reading the archives: I did: ./configure --enable-dev-mode --prefix=/tmp/asterisk --sysconfdir=/tmp/astconf --localstatedir=/tmp/aststate and than make install.: This is the error I

hello, samba. i have running samba 2.2.8a from the ports on the system: FreeBSD bingo.ru 4.7-STABLE FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE #2: Tue Mar 25 20:30:51 YEKT 2003 root@bingo.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/bingo i386 with config: === cut === [global] workgroup = bingo netbios name = emily server string = bingo samba daemon hosts allow = 192.168.2. 127. hosts deny = 192.168.1. interfaces = xl2 bind

Hi working on Ubuntu server 16.04.1 with Samba Version 4.3.11-Ubuntu I have an AD-DC and a Domain Member for file sharing All tests are OK. Loggon with remote profiles works. Today I changed (ldbedit) the GID of the Domain Users from 5000 to 10001 (No files will be generated with this GID. It is here only for wbinfo to work). The change was accepted. ldbsearch on the AD-DC shows the new GID of

Well, I've made some progress. Excuse the detail, but this might help others as I've so far found NOTHING on this, including with the Mac Enterprise maillist (so far). If I unchecked all the Directory Utility mapping options, I was able to log in! Yeah! But, the UID.GID numbers were 1793602029.1840809715. Next I tried just setting the "Map group GID to attribute" to 10000 (my

Hi! I'm apologize for my poor English, but have a question. This question is a shorter than one i posted not so long ago (https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2013-September/175649.html) and received no answer for a while. In this question i took a log from the different server, but this is no matter: the problem persists on all of my servers. So, my OS is FreeBSD 9.0, my Samba is 3.6.18

Hello list members, I started to develop a kernel module which hooks into Lustre 2.3 for controlling data access based on nid and uid/gid. The background is the following: Here at GSI we have currently a reserved uid/gid space which partner institutes are using to access our exported Lustre mounts. However, we currently have no mechanism to control (guaranty) that the reserved uid/gid space are

Le mar. 20 ao?t 2019 ? 14:30, L.P.H. van Belle via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : > > Hai, > > > > > In short. My network design previously work with Debian Stretch > > Servers and clients and some Windows clients (not many). > > > > Debian Stretch use Samba 4.5.16 so there is no unix_primary_group > > option for the clients. So I have

Hello. I'm not quite sure what the problem with my samba is. Im running red hat 9 and samba 3.0 and my log has far too much information. this is my samba log: --------------------- samba Begin ------------------------ **Unmatched Entries** lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(978) getpeername failed. Error was Socket operati on on non-socket : 2 Time(s)

hope thus comes under the remit of this mailking list... We use puppet, and Im trying to come up with "code" that will create two user accounts with a shared groiup ID eg? user1 with UID 1000user 2 with UID 1001 but I would like them BOTH to share the GID of 2000 I've tried the following accounts::groups:? ? jointgroup:? ? ? ? gid: '2000' accounts::users: ? ? user1:? ? ? ?

Recently we updated a Gluster replicated setup from 3.6 to 3.12 (stepping through 3.8 first before going to 3.12). Afterwards I noticed the brick logs were filling at an alarming rate on the server we have the NFS service running from: $ sudo tail -20 /var/log/glusterfs/bricks/export-gluster-shared.log [2018-05-23 06:22:12.405240] I [MSGID: 139001] [posix-acl.c:269:posix_acl_log_permit_denied]

The reason why is that simple: the other admin only knows the windows world and that's why it's gonna be risky regarding file services when he creates new users or groups and forgets about the Unix tab. My personal hope is that samba will one day set rfc ids automatically so that these windows guys won't have to care. E.g. it could be an option when provisioning a new domain. It would

Hoping someone can help me fix something that I apparently messed up, i have the issue that when I untar a file as root the uid and gid that get set are not roots'. I had change a user uid and gid to 1000 via usermo -u etc.... but somehow it appears to have effected the root user. When I touch files as root the correct uid and gid are root, however when untaring an archive the directory and

I am using either DOMAIN or ADS for authentication and am trying to understand how UID/GID mapping rules are triggered. This[1] seems to suggest that if I do not specify the idmap uid/gid parameters in smb.conf, then authenticated usernames are mapped to "local" user accounts having the same name. If, however, I _do_ specify idmap uid/gid then one of the idmap_* allocator modules is

Le mer. 21 ao?t 2019 ? 14:34, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : > On 21/08/2019 09:04, Prunk Dump via samba wrote: > > Le mar. 20 ao?t 2019 ? 14:30, L.P.H. van Belle via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : > >> Hai, > >> > >>> In short. My network design previously work with Debian Stretch >

On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 15:25:56 -0700 Kris Lou wrote:kvia samba <samba at lists.samba.org> > > There are basically 3 ways: > * dsconfigad (https://gist.github.com/bzerangue/6886182) OK, I ran 'dsconfigad -show' and got the following results. They basically look OK to my limited understanding except for the Mapping options. I did check those mapping boxes, but I guess it also