Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "ghci".
Did you mean:
ghcb
2011 Oct 14
1
[LLVMdev] Request for merge: GHC/ARM calling convention.
...atch you will easy adoption of GHC on ARM platform,
and although GHC is already available on ARM platform in its
"unregisterised" form, when LLVM is available with patch applied, GHC
might be build in "registerised" form. This provides not only a lot of
nice features of GHC (GHCi, Template Haskell, DPH etc.) but also
significant performance improvement[3]. This all is missing from
"unregisterised" built and might be presented in case of LLVM-supported
"registerised" build of GHC.
If you insist an even minimalistic test-case, then please let me know....