search for: ghccall

Hi Duncan, > const unsigned* > ARMBaseRegisterInfo::getCalleeSavedRegs(const MachineFunction *MF) const { > + bool ghcCall = false; > + > + if (MF) { > + const Function *F = MF->getFunction(); > + ghcCall = (F ? F->getCallingConv() == CallingConv::GHC : false); > + } > This bit looks dubious. Why do you need to do it? What exactly? We need to test if this is GHC calling conventi...

Hi Duncan, On 10/14/11 03:56 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Karel, > >> > const unsigned* >> > ARMBaseRegisterInfo::getCalleeSavedRegs(const MachineFunction *MF) >> const { >> > + bool ghcCall = false; >> > + >> > + if (MF) { >> > + const Function *F = MF->getFunction(); >> > + ghcCall = (F ? F->getCallingConv() == CallingConv::GHC : false); >> > + } >> >> > This bit looks dubious. Why do you need to do it? >> >&g...

Hi Karel, >>> > const unsigned* >>> > ARMBaseRegisterInfo::getCalleeSavedRegs(const MachineFunction *MF) >>> const { >>> > + bool ghcCall = false; >>> > + >>> > + if (MF) { >>> > + const Function *F = MF->getFunction(); >>> > + ghcCall = (F ? F->getCallingConv() == CallingConv::GHC : false); >>> > + } >>> >>> > This bit looks dubious. Why do you ne...

Hi Karel, > > const unsigned* > > ARMBaseRegisterInfo::getCalleeSavedRegs(const MachineFunction *MF) const { > > + bool ghcCall = false; > > + > > + if (MF) { > > + const Function *F = MF->getFunction(); > > + ghcCall = (F ? F->getCallingConv() == CallingConv::GHC : false); > > + } > > > This bit looks dubious. Why do you need to do it? > > What exactly? We need to te...

...should get an X86 prefix. If not, it should move up to be #10 after Cold. 2) In either case, please document the new calling convention in docs/LangRef.html#callingconv 3) IN X86RegisterInfo.cpp, this patch: if (Is64Bit) { if (IsWin64) - return CalleeSavedRegsWin64; + return (ghcCall ? GhcCalleeSavedRegsWin64 : CalleeSavedRegsWin64); else - return (callsEHReturn ? CalleeSavedRegs64EHRet : CalleeSavedRegs64Bit); + if (ghcCall) + return (callsEHReturn ? + GhcCalleeSavedRegs64EHRet : GhcCalleeSavedRegs64Bit); + else + return (call...

...ng it implemented on SPARC next. > 2) In either case, please document the new calling convention in docs/LangRef.html#callingconv Done. > 3) IN X86RegisterInfo.cpp, this patch: > > if (Is64Bit) { > if (IsWin64) > - return CalleeSavedRegsWin64; > + return (ghcCall ? GhcCalleeSavedRegsWin64 : CalleeSavedRegsWin64); > else > - return (callsEHReturn ? CalleeSavedRegs64EHRet : CalleeSavedRegs64Bit); > + if (ghcCall) > + return (callsEHReturn ? > + GhcCalleeSavedRegs64EHRet : GhcCalleeSavedRegs64Bit); > +...

Hi all, As previously mentioned on this list the Haskell compiler GHC has a new LLVM based back-end. The back-end needs a new calling convention to efficiently use LLVM and that is what this patch does, just for X86 at the moment. Breakdown: 1) Need actual calling convention Touches: - include/llvm/CallingConv.h - lib/Target/X86/X86CallingConv.td 2) Handling new calling

Hello, today is the last day[1] when someone might ask for feature merge into the LLVM 3.0 release. I'd like to ask you to merge attached patch. This is implementation of GHC calling convention on ARM platform which is made by Stephen Blackheath with few additions by me. I hope that although the patch does not contain any test case, it still will be merged. The reason for this is that

Hi Duncan, Karel, On 14 October 2011 08:22, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Karel, > >>>> > const unsigned* >>>> > ARMBaseRegisterInfo::getCalleeSavedRegs(const MachineFunction *MF) >>>> const { >>>> > + bool ghcCall = false; >>>> > + >>>> > + if (MF) { >>>> > + const Function *F = MF->getFunction(); >>>> > + ghcCall = (F ? F->getCallingConv() == CallingConv::GHC : false); >>>> > + } >>>> >>>> > This bit...