search for: ghcb_sev_ghcb_resp_code

...+#define GHCB_CPUID_REQ_ECX 2 +#define GHCB_CPUID_REQ_EDX 3 +#define GHCB_CPUID_REQ(fn, reg) (GHCB_SEV_CPUID_REQ | \ + (((unsigned long)reg & 3) << 30) | \ + (((unsigned long)fn) << 32)) + +#define GHCB_SEV_CPUID_RESP 0x005UL +#define GHCB_SEV_TERMINATE 0x100UL + +#define GHCB_SEV_GHCB_RESP_CODE(v) ((v) & 0xfff) +#define VMGEXIT() { asm volatile("rep; vmmcall\n\r"); } + +void __init do_vc_no_ghcb(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long exit_code); + +static inline u64 lower_bits(u64 val, unsigned int bits) +{ + u64 mask = (1ULL << bits) - 1; + + return (val & mask); +...

...+#define GHCB_CPUID_REQ_ECX 2 +#define GHCB_CPUID_REQ_EDX 3 +#define GHCB_CPUID_REQ(fn, reg) (GHCB_SEV_CPUID_REQ | \ + (((unsigned long)reg & 3) << 30) | \ + (((unsigned long)fn) << 32)) + +#define GHCB_SEV_CPUID_RESP 0x005UL +#define GHCB_SEV_TERMINATE 0x100UL + +#define GHCB_SEV_GHCB_RESP_CODE(v) ((v) & 0xfff) +#define VMGEXIT() { asm volatile("rep; vmmcall\n\r"); } + +static inline u64 lower_bits(u64 val, unsigned int bits) +{ + u64 mask = (1ULL << bits) - 1; + + return (val & mask); +} + +static inline u64 copy_lower_bits(u64 out, u64 in, unsigned int bits) +{...

...+#define GHCB_CPUID_REQ_ECX 2 +#define GHCB_CPUID_REQ_EDX 3 +#define GHCB_CPUID_REQ(fn, reg) (GHCB_SEV_CPUID_REQ | \ + (((unsigned long)reg & 3) << 30) | \ + (((unsigned long)fn) << 32)) + +#define GHCB_SEV_CPUID_RESP 0x005UL +#define GHCB_SEV_TERMINATE 0x100UL + +#define GHCB_SEV_GHCB_RESP_CODE(v) ((v) & 0xfff) +#define VMGEXIT() { asm volatile("rep; vmmcall\n\r"); } + +void do_vc_no_ghcb(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long exit_code); + +static inline u64 lower_bits(u64 val, unsigned int bits) +{ + u64 mask = (1ULL << bits) - 1; + + return (val & mask); +} + +#e...

...\ > + (((unsigned long)reg & 3) << 30) | \ > + (((unsigned long)fn) << 32)) > + > +#define GHCB_SEV_CPUID_RESP 0x005UL > +#define GHCB_SEV_TERMINATE 0x100UL > + > +#define GHCB_SEV_GHCB_RESP_CODE(v) ((v) & 0xfff) > +#define VMGEXIT() { asm volatile("rep; vmmcall\n\r"); } > + > +static inline u64 lower_bits(u64 val, unsigned int bits) > +{ > + u64 mask = (1ULL << bits) - 1; > + > + return (val & mask);...

...\ > + (((unsigned long)reg & 3) << 30) | \ > + (((unsigned long)fn) << 32)) > + > +#define GHCB_SEV_CPUID_RESP 0x005UL > +#define GHCB_SEV_TERMINATE 0x100UL > + > +#define GHCB_SEV_GHCB_RESP_CODE(v) ((v) & 0xfff) > +#define VMGEXIT() { asm volatile("rep; vmmcall\n\r"); } > + > +static inline u64 lower_bits(u64 val, unsigned int bits) > +{ > + u64 mask = (1ULL << bits) - 1; > + > + return (val & mask);...

...efine GHCB_SEV_CPUID_REQ 0x004UL #define GHCB_CPUID_REQ_EAX 0 #define GHCB_CPUID_REQ_EBX 1 @@ -21,10 +28,36 @@ #define GHCB_SEV_CPUID_RESP 0x005UL #define GHCB_SEV_TERMINATE 0x100UL +#define GHCB_SEV_ES_REASON_GENERAL_REQUEST 0 +#define GHCB_SEV_ES_REASON_PROTOCOL_UNSUPPORTED 1 #define GHCB_SEV_GHCB_RESP_CODE(v) ((v) & 0xfff) #define VMGEXIT() { asm volatile("rep; vmmcall\n\r"); } +enum es_result { + ES_OK, /* All good */ + ES_UNSUPPORTED, /* Requested operation not supported */ + ES_VMM_ERROR, /* Unexpected state from the VMM */ + ES_DECODE_FAILED, /* Instruction decoding failed...

...SEV_TERMINATE 0x100UL +#define GHCB_SEV_TERMINATE_REASON(reason_set, reason_val) \ + (((((u64)reason_set) & 0x7) << 12) | \ + ((((u64)reason_val) & 0xff) << 16)) +#define GHCB_SEV_ES_REASON_GENERAL_REQUEST 0 +#define GHCB_SEV_ES_REASON_PROTOCOL_UNSUPPORTED 1 #define GHCB_SEV_GHCB_RESP_CODE(v) ((v) & 0xfff) #define VMGEXIT() { asm volatile("rep; vmmcall\n\r"); } +enum es_result { + ES_OK, /* All good */ + ES_UNSUPPORTED, /* Requested operation not supported */ + ES_VMM_ERROR, /* Unexpected state from the VMM */ + ES_DECODE_FAILED, /* Instruction decoding failed...

Hi, here is the first public post of the patch-set to enable Linux to run under SEV-ES enabled hypervisors. The code is mostly feature-complete, but there are still a couple of bugs to fix. Nevertheless, given the size of the patch-set, I think it is about time to ask for initial feedback of the changes that come with it. To better understand the code here is a quick explanation of SEV-ES first.

Hi, here is the first public post of the patch-set to enable Linux to run under SEV-ES enabled hypervisors. The code is mostly feature-complete, but there are still a couple of bugs to fix. Nevertheless, given the size of the patch-set, I think it is about time to ask for initial feedback of the changes that come with it. To better understand the code here is a quick explanation of SEV-ES first.

Hi, here is the next version of changes to enable Linux to run as an SEV-ES guest. The code was rebased to v5.7-rc3 and got a fair number of changes since the last version. What is SEV-ES ============== SEV-ES is an acronym for 'Secure Encrypted Virtualization - Encrypted State' and means a hardware feature of AMD processors which hides the register state of VCPUs to the hypervisor by

Hi, here is the next version of changes to enable Linux to run as an SEV-ES guest. The code was rebased to v5.7-rc3 and got a fair number of changes since the last version. What is SEV-ES ============== SEV-ES is an acronym for 'Secure Encrypted Virtualization - Encrypted State' and means a hardware feature of AMD processors which hides the register state of VCPUs to the hypervisor by

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is a rebased version of the latest SEV-ES patches. They are now based on latest tip/master instead of upstream Linux and include the necessary changes. Changes to v4 are in particular: - Moved early IDT setup code to idt.c, because the idt_descr and the idt_table are now static - This required to make stack protector work early (or

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is the fourth version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches. I addressed the review comments sent to me for the previous version and rebased the code v5.8-rc5. The biggest change in this version is the IST handling code for the #VC handler. I adapted the entry code for the #VC handler to the big pile of entry code changes merged into

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is the fourth version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches. I addressed the review comments sent to me for the previous version and rebased the code v5.8-rc5. The biggest change in this version is the IST handling code for the #VC handler. I adapted the entry code for the #VC handler to the big pile of entry code changes merged into

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is the new version of the SEV-ES client enabling patch-set. It is based on the latest tip/master branch and contains the necessary changes. In particular those ar: - Enabling CR4.FSGSBASE early on supported processors so that early #VC exceptions on APs can be handled. - Add another patch (patch 1) to fix a KVM frame-size build

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is a new version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches for x86. The previous versions can be found as a linked list starting here: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200824085511.7553-1-joro at 8bytes.org/ I updated the patch-set based on ther review comments I got and the discussions around it. Another important change is that the early IDT

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is a new version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches for x86. The previous versions can be found as a linked list starting here: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200824085511.7553-1-joro at 8bytes.org/ I updated the patch-set based on ther review comments I got and the discussions around it. Another important change is that the early IDT