search for: ghcarm

...sions) compiled by GCC 4.3.4, 4.4.1, 4.4.5, 4.5.2, 4.6.1 Linaro 2011.05 and 4.6.1 Linaro 2011.06. It looks like LLVM HEAD does have about 28 regressions in comparison with LLVM 2.9. If you are curious to know more or to get actual `make check' logs for all the combinations please see http://ghcarm.wordpress.com/2011/07/03/llvm-on-arm-testing/ Is there anything other I might do for you to get those regressions fixed? Thanks, Karel

On 3 July 2011 21:32, Karel Gardas <karel.gardas at centrum.cz> wrote: > please see http://ghcarm.wordpress.com/2011/07/03/llvm-on-arm-testing/ > > Is there anything other I might do for you to get those regressions fixed? Hi Karel, This is great! I can see there's only a handful of errors. All JIT errors seem to be the same (MC). All O2 errors, too (MIPS). The select.ll error was...

...ith something till the end of this month. Anyway, I still hope that missing test is not merge-stopper especially when GHC/LLVM/ARM is tested with its own set of tests... Thanks for considering this! Karel [1]: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2011-September/043287.html [2]: http://ghcarm.wordpress.com/2011/08/27/current-status-merged-into-ghc-head/ [3]: http://ghcarm.wordpress.com/tag/nofib/ -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: llvm-ghc-arm.diff URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20111014/...

...by GCC 4.3.4, 4.4.1, 4.4.5, 4.5.2, 4.6.1 Linaro > 2011.05 and 4.6.1 Linaro 2011.06. It looks like LLVM HEAD does have > about 28 regressions in comparison with LLVM 2.9. If you are curious to > know more or to get actual `make check' logs for all the combinations > please see http://ghcarm.wordpress.com/2011/07/03/llvm-on-arm-testing/ > > Is there anything other I might do for you to get those regressions fixed? I'm curious if anybody is still tracking the status of ARM support in LLVM. Right now I'm getting the following errors for llvm-3.0rc4 test suite on arm linux...

...fault) and with "-marm -O1" as optimize option I'm on 28 (4.5.2) and 18 (4.4.3) failing testcases. (-marm being better than -mthumb) (also here[2]) So I'm curious what's *the* recommended compiler on this platform which LLVM development is using? Thanks! Karel [1]: http://ghcarm.wordpress.com/2011/06/18/llvm-on-arm/ [2]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm/+bug/513735

...by GCC 4.3.4, 4.4.1, 4.4.5, 4.5.2, 4.6.1 Linaro > 2011.05 and 4.6.1 Linaro 2011.06. It looks like LLVM HEAD does have > about 28 regressions in comparison with LLVM 2.9. If you are curious to > know more or to get actual `make check' logs for all the combinations > please see http://ghcarm.wordpress.com/2011/07/03/llvm-on-arm-testing/ > > Is there anything other I might do for you to get those regressions fixed? I just filed http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10258 for the 2009-06-05-VariableIndexInsert.ll failure. For the JIT failures, it would be nice if you could track d...

Hi Renato, On 07/ 5/11 12:20 PM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 3 July 2011 21:32, Karel Gardas<karel.gardas at centrum.cz> wrote: >> please see http://ghcarm.wordpress.com/2011/07/03/llvm-on-arm-testing/ >> >> Is there anything other I might do for you to get those regressions fixed? > > Hi Karel, > > This is great! > > I can see there's only a handful of errors. All JIT errors seem to be > the same (MC). All O2 erro...