search for: ghanshyamdas

...> > When consulting the R-Help Archives today I've noticed that the thread > > > > Pipe operator > > > > started by John Sorkin, Tue Jan 3 17:48:30 CET 2023 is under another > > thread, > > > > R Certification > > > > started by Mukesh Ghanshyamdas Lekhrajani. > > > > Isn't this a bug in the filing system? > > > > Thanks to the list maintainer Martin Maechler and ETH Zurich for > > organizing and hosting the list for all of us. It's an invaluable tool > > that has served so many R users along the y...

Hello, When consulting the R-Help Archives today I've noticed that the thread Pipe operator started by John Sorkin, Tue Jan 3 17:48:30 CET 2023 is under another thread, R Certification started by Mukesh Ghanshyamdas Lekhrajani. Isn't this a bug in the filing system? Thanks to the list maintainer Martin Maechler and ETH Zurich for organizing and hosting the list for all of us. It's an invaluable tool that has served so many R users along the years and that surely gives a lot of work organizing and...

...ther than starting a fresh email, > and in his attempts to hide that, was outsmarted by Outlook. That's 100% correct. The starting "Pipe operator" e-mail has In-Reply-To: <047e01d91ed5$577e42a0$067ac7e0$@yahoo.com>, and the message with this Message-ID is the one from Mukesh Ghanshyamdas Lekhrajani with the subject "Re: [R] R Certification" that's immediately above the message by John Sorkin. -- Best regards, Ivan

...sh email, >> and in his attempts to hide that, was outsmarted by Outlook. > > That's 100% correct. The starting "Pipe operator" e-mail has > In-Reply-To: <047e01d91ed5$577e42a0$067ac7e0$@yahoo.com>, and the > message with this Message-ID is the one from Mukesh Ghanshyamdas > Lekhrajani with the subject "Re: [R] R Certification" that's > immediately above the message by John Sorkin. > Thanks, I was searching the archives for something else, stumbled on that and forgot to look at the heders. Good news there's nothing wrong with R-Help. Rui...