Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "ggate".
Did you mean:
gate
2003 Apr 01
3
* on openmosix
Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 2061 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20030402/72ae3ce0/attachment.gif
2008 Jul 15
5
Multi-machine mirroring choices
...would appear as though iscsi may not be the way to go for this as it
locks up when the target goes down and even though I may be able to
remove the target from the mirror, that process may fail as the "disk"
remains in "D" state.
So that leaves me with the following options:
1) ggated/ggatec + gmirror
2) ggated/ggatec + zfs (zpool mirror)
3) zfs send/recv incremental snapshots (ssh)
1) I have been using ggated/ggatec on a set of 6.2-REL boxes and find
that ggated tends to fail after some time leaving me rebuilding the
mirror periodically (and gmirror resilvering takes quite so...
2004 Nov 17
9
serious networking (em) performance (ggate and NFS) problem
...6k
^C1858+0 records in
1857+0 records out
30425088 bytes transferred in 8.758475 secs (3473788 bytes/sec)
-> ^^^^^^^ ~ 3,4MB/s
This example shows that using NFS over GigaBit Ethernet decimates performance
by the factor of 15, in words fifteen!
GGATE with MTU 16114 and polling:
test2:/dev#28: ggatec create 10.0.0.2 /dev/ad4p1
ggate0
test2:/dev#29: mount /dev/ggate0 /samsung/
test2:/dev#30: dd if=/dev/zero of=/samsung/testfile bs=16k
^C2564+0 records in
2563+0 records out
41992192 bytes transferred in 15.908581 secs (2639594 bytes/sec)
-&...
2012 Mar 30
6
9-STABLE, ZFS, NFS, ggatec - suspected memory leak
Hi all,
Setup:
I'm running 2 machines (amd64, 16GB) with FreeBSD 9-STABLE (Mar 14 so
far) acting as NFS servers. They each serve 3 zpools (holding a single
zfs, hourly snapshots). The zpools each are 3-way mirrors of ggate
devices, each 2 TB, so 2 TB per zpool. Compression is "on" (to save
bandwith to the backend, compressratio around 1.05 to 1.15), atime is
off.
There is no special tuning in loader.conf (except I tried to limit ZFS
ARC to 8GB lately, which doesn't change a lot). sysctl.conf has:...
2007 Apr 06
11
ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base.
...will come later, as we implement needed atomic operations.
Missing functionality.
- We don''t have iSCSI target daemon in the tree, so sharing ZVOLs via
iSCSI is also not supported at this point. This should be fixed in
the future, we may also add support for sharing ZVOLs over ggate.
- There is no support for ACLs and extended attributes.
- There is no support for booting off of ZFS file system.
Other than that, ZFS should be fully-functional.
Enjoy!
--
Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl
pjd at FreeBSD.org http://www...