Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "gfortranresult".
Did you mean:
gfortranresults
2006 Sep 09
2
[LLVMdev] gfortran calling convention
You wrote:
> The NIST F77 test suite doesn't seem to be compatible with gfortran at
> all,
Actually, the entire suite compiles flawlessly with gfortran.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranResults
Gr.
Steven
2006 Sep 09
3
[LLVMdev] gfortran calling convention
...g> wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > You wrote:
> >> The NIST F77 test suite doesn't seem to be compatible with gfortran at
> >> all,
> > Actually, the entire suite compiles flawlessly with gfortran.
> > See http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranResults
>
> Was that true of GCC 4.0.1?
No, gfortran in gcc 4.0 is, ehm, highly experimental (read: a piece of
junk). Gfortran in gcc 4.1 was the first one that worked for NIST (and
for SPEC).
Gr.
Steven
2006 Sep 09
0
[LLVMdev] gfortran calling convention
On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> You wrote:
>> The NIST F77 test suite doesn't seem to be compatible with gfortran at
>> all,
> Actually, the entire suite compiles flawlessly with gfortran.
> See http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranResults
Was that true of GCC 4.0.1?
-Chris
--
http://nondot.org/sabre/
http://llvm.org/
2006 Sep 11
2
[LLVMdev] gfortran calling convention
...her wrote:
> > > > You wrote:
> > > >> The NIST F77 test suite doesn't seem to be compatible with gfortran at
> > > >> all,
> > > > Actually, the entire suite compiles flawlessly with gfortran.
> > > > See http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranResults
> > >
> > > Was that true of GCC 4.0.1?
> >
> > No, gfortran in gcc 4.0 is, ehm, highly experimental (read: a piece of
> > junk). Gfortran in gcc 4.1 was the first one that worked for NIST (and
> > for SPEC).
>
> Hm. I had noticed a bunch of changes...
2006 Sep 10
0
[LLVMdev] gfortran calling convention
...9 Sep 2006, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > > You wrote:
> > >> The NIST F77 test suite doesn't seem to be compatible with gfortran at
> > >> all,
> > > Actually, the entire suite compiles flawlessly with gfortran.
> > > See http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranResults
> >
> > Was that true of GCC 4.0.1?
>
> No, gfortran in gcc 4.0 is, ehm, highly experimental (read: a piece of
> junk). Gfortran in gcc 4.1 was the first one that worked for NIST (and
> for SPEC).
Hm. I had noticed a bunch of changes in the current sources, but had
hoped 4...
2006 Sep 11
0
[LLVMdev] gfortran calling convention
...> > You wrote:
> > > > >> The NIST F77 test suite doesn't seem to be compatible with gfortran at
> > > > >> all,
> > > > > Actually, the entire suite compiles flawlessly with gfortran.
> > > > > See http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranResults
> > > >
> > > > Was that true of GCC 4.0.1?
> > >
> > > No, gfortran in gcc 4.0 is, ehm, highly experimental (read: a piece of
> > > junk). Gfortran in gcc 4.1 was the first one that worked for NIST (and
> > > for SPEC).
> >
> &g...