search for: gfi

Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML... URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help-es/attachments/20120425/dafc9a68/attachment.html>

...5, g wrote: > On 06/05/2015 03:43 PM, John R Pierce wrote: >> On 6/5/2015 1:33 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote: >>> It's a desktop in an old house. >>> The outlets have ground-fault protection, >>> but the third prong is ungrounded. >> >> not sure how GFI would function at all without a valid ground, unless >> the GFI is wired to neutral, which is dangerous on its own. As I understand it, GFI sums the currents going into each prong. If the sum is not close enough to zero, it breaks the circuit. >> also, things like fluorescent lamps ca...

On 6/5/2015 1:33 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote: > It's a desktop in an old house. > The outlets have ground-fault protection, > but the third prong is ungrounded. > not sure how GFI would function at all without a valid ground, unless the GFI is wired to neutral, which is dangerous on its own. you might get a 3-prong-to-2-prong adapter and plug the PC into that, leaving the ground wire floating, and see if that works. As most desktops have the AC ground pin wired to the...

...escribed in the GC doc), and I've run into a weird problem. (Note, this has nothing to do with the patch I have proposed, this error occurs with regular old pointer-allocas.) The exception I am getting occurs in this code here in SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp: *case* *Intrinsic*::gcroot: *if* (GFI) { *const* Value *Alloca = I.getArgOperand(0); *const* Constant *TypeMap = cast<Constant>(I.getArgOperand(1)); * FrameIndexSDNode *FI = cast<FrameIndexSDNode>(getValue(Alloca).getNode());* GFI->addStackRoot(FI->getIndex(), TypeMap); } *return* 0; Specific...

...here was about 1.4Gb of changes, but on the second day 4-8-2004 now has changed to 9.1Gb and Current is only 29Gb?? Strange. Does this mean that 4-8-2004 is no longer properly hard-linked to /Current? Would there be any difference using --link-destination in rsync and not using cp at all? [root@gfi backup]# du --max-depth=1 -h 37G ./Current 1.4G ./04-08-2004 26M ./04-09-2004 38G . [root@gfi backup]# du --max-depth=1 -h 29G ./Current 9.1G ./04-08-2004 211M ./04-09-2004 26M ./04-10-2004 39G .

...se time. We appreciate your patience. ******************************************************************************************************************************************** ----- rsync Wrote ----- Dear Recipient, This mail is not complete because a part of it (body or attachment) violated GFI Content Security's security policy. That part has been deleted by the GFI Content Security BitDefender Engine Module. Regards, GFI Content Security http://www.gfi.com/

...se time. We appreciate your patience. ******************************************************************************************************************************************** ----- rsync Wrote ----- Dear Recipient, This mail is not complete because a part of it (body or attachment) violated GFI Content Security's security policy. That part has been deleted by the GFI Content Security BitDefender Engine Module. Regards, GFI Content Security http://www.gfi.com/

I can set up and access a dovecot pop3 account using outlook express fine. I can telnet into it fine. However, GFI FaxMaker is failing to log in. I assisted a client in switching his web site, including email from one server (FreeBSD) which was using Cyrus to a Redhat 4.0 server using dovecot version 0.99.11 Here's the listing of dovecot -n: dovecot -n Usage: dovecot [-F] [-c <config file>] Fatal: U...

...into a weird problem. (Note, this has > nothing to do with the patch I have proposed, this error occurs with regular > old pointer-allocas.) > > The exception I am getting occurs in this code here in > SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp: > > *case* *Intrinsic*::gcroot: > > *if* (GFI) { > *const* Value *Alloca = I.getArgOperand(0); > *const* Constant *TypeMap = cast<Constant>(I.getArgOperand(1)); > * FrameIndexSDNode *FI = cast<FrameIndexSDNode>(getValue(Alloca).getNode());* GFI->addStackRoot(FI->getIndex(), TypeMap); > }...

I have a x100p card that has call waiting on the line comming into it and then into *..... is there any way i can use call waiting on that line? Michael

On 06/05/2015 03:43 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 6/5/2015 1:33 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote: >> It's a desktop in an old house. >> The outlets have ground-fault protection, >> but the third prong is ungrounded. > > not sure how GFI would function at all without a valid ground, unless > the GFI is wired to neutral, which is dangerous on its own. very. it defeats gfi faulting principal entirely. > you might get a 3-prong-to-2-prong adapter and plug the PC into that, > leaving the ground wire floating, and see if th...

...a4.1.0pre1 bind9.9.1-P1 (working pretty well. it even updates the reverse zone and no problems at all with the forwarder) ntp-4.2.6p5 All services authenticating with samba4: mail (postfix + dovecot + squirrelmail), jabber (openfire), proxy (squid), even MS Sql server 2000, Net Support Manager and GFI Endpoint Security. It's really a great job you've been doing, Samba Team!! Cheers, Felix.

I'm trying to track down the problem with the assertion failure in SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp. This is the code: *case* *Intrinsic*::gcroot: *if* (GFI) { *const* Value *Alloca = I.getArgOperand(0); *const* Constant *TypeMap = cast<Constant>(I.getArgOperand(1)); * FrameIndexSDNode *FI = cast<FrameIndexSDNode>(getValue(Alloca).getNode());* GFI->addStackRoot(FI->getIndex(), TypeMap); } *return* 0 The cast&...

Hi Ankur, > The flags "-view-sched-dags".. described in the doc doesn't seem to work. ( > "llc -help" doesn't list it ). as far as I remember, displaying DAGs during compilation is only enabled in "debug builds" [1] of LLVM. You probably have to re-configure and re-compile LLVM to enable this feature. Best regards, Christoph [1]

I am trying to understand the SelectionDAG construction from LLVM IR. I have gone through the doc "The LLVM Target-Independent Code Generator" on LLVM site. This gives a great initial overview. However I am unable to catch the actual control flow for the llvm->selectionDag conversion. The flags "-view-sched-dags".. described in the doc doesn't seem to work. ( "llc

------- BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE ------- From: g.pardon@pi.be To: teastep@shorewall.net Cc: Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] Open ports How am I testing this? I''m doing a portscan using a portscanner like GFI Languard, Superscanner and nmap to check. Those two TCP-ports always showed up. Although, I think there are other to test it. I read the FAQ and the phenomenon (where is that Dutch-English dictionary when you need it) is explained by the nature of UDP ports and the DROP- command. Now I know I don&...

...convergenceM1 <- as.numeric(M1$convergence) chiM1 <- as.numeric(myModlChiM1$chisq) dfM1 <- as.numeric(myModlChiM1$df) chiM0 <- as.numeric(myModlChiM1$chisqNull) dfM0 <- as.numeric(myModlChiM1$dfNull) GFIM1 <- as.numeric(myModlChiM1$GFI) AGFIM1 <- as.numeric(myModlChiM1$AGFI) RMSEAM1 <- as.numeric(myModlChiM1$RMSEA[1]) CFIM1 <- as.numeric(myModlChiM1$CFI) BICM1 <- as.numeric(myModlChiM1$BIC) SRMRM1...

...EMC6 EMC7 EMC8 0.3622224 0.2350041 0.2488009 0.2901653 0.3195399 0.3107343 0.3436622 0.2345912 EMC9 EMC10 EMC11 EMC12 EMC13 EMC14 EMC15 EMC16 0.2621680 0.3230400 0.4039245 0.3803105 0.2773370 0.4348342 0.2757216 0.3405252 The fit indices of RMSEA and GFI are good, so I think the problem might be solve by another way for computing the Chi-square of null model. I'm not well trained in maths, so I come for help. Any advise is appreciated. Best wishes, Wei-Wei

On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 12:30:16PM -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote: > On Fri, 5 Jun 2015, Frank Cox wrote: > > >On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 12:05:43 -0500 (CDT) > >Michael Hennebry wrote: > > > >>whether a microphone will introduce humming? > > > >Is it a 60 cycle hum? If so, it's probably induced by poor grounding. > > I suspect so. > Is that

...___________ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ----- This mail was content checked for malicious code and viruses by GFI MailSecurity.