Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "gf100_gr_oneinit".
Did you mean:
gf100_fb_oneinit
2015 Sep 03
2
[PATCH 2/2] gr/gf100: do not assume a PMU is present
...changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gf100.c b/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gf100.c
> index f1358a564e3e..f252fa2d7cf9 100644
> --- a/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gf100.c
> +++ b/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gf100.c
> @@ -1499,7 +1499,8 @@ gf100_gr_oneinit(struct nvkm_gr *base)
> struct nvkm_device *device = gr->base.engine.subdev.device;
> int ret, i, j;
>
> - nvkm_pmu_pgob(device->pmu, false);
> + if (device->pmu)
> + nvkm_pmu_pgob(device->pmu, false);
I'd probably just cha...
2015 Sep 03
2
[PATCH 2/2] gr/gf100: do not assume a PMU is present
...;>
>>> diff --git a/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gf100.c b/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gf100.c
>>> index f1358a564e3e..f252fa2d7cf9 100644
>>> --- a/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gf100.c
>>> +++ b/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gf100.c
>>> @@ -1499,7 +1499,8 @@ gf100_gr_oneinit(struct nvkm_gr *base)
>>> struct nvkm_device *device = gr->base.engine.subdev.device;
>>> int ret, i, j;
>>>
>>> - nvkm_pmu_pgob(device->pmu, false);
>>> + if (device->pmu)
>>> + nvkm_pmu_pgob(d...
2015 Sep 03
5
[PATCH 0/2] two trivial PMU fixes
Two trivial PMU-related fixes for Tegra:
- Add a dummy func member to GK20A, since nvkm_pmmu_pgob() unconditionally
dereferences it
- Check whether a PMU actually exists before calling nvkm_pmmu_pgob(). During
early bringup we are likely to not have a PMU
Alexandre Courbot (2):
pmu/gk20a: add dummy func
gr/gf100: do not assume a PMU is present
drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gf100.c | 3 ++-
2016 Sep 25
0
[PATCH 2/3] drm/nouveau: mark symbols static where possible
...u/nvkm/engine/gr/gf100.c
@@ -1384,7 +1384,7 @@ gf100_gr_intr(struct nvkm_gr *base)
nvkm_fifo_chan_put(device->fifo, flags, &chan);
}
-void
+static void
gf100_gr_init_fw(struct gf100_gr *gr, u32 fuc_base,
struct gf100_gr_fuc *code, struct gf100_gr_fuc *data)
{
@@ -1701,7 +1701,7 @@ gf100_gr_oneinit(struct nvkm_gr *base)
return 0;
}
-int
+static int
gf100_gr_init_(struct nvkm_gr *base)
{
struct gf100_gr *gr = gf100_gr(base);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gm107.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gm107.c
index 45f965f..2c67fac 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/n...
2016 Oct 24
1
[PATCH v2 1/2] drm/nouveau: add missing header dependencies
We get a few warnings when building kernel with W=1:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/firmware.c:34:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvkm_firmware_get' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/firmware.c:58:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvkm_firmware_put' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/sddr3.c:69:1: warning: no previous
2016 Aug 30
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: silence warnings reported during builds with W=1
...u/nvkm/engine/gr/gf100.c
@@ -1384,7 +1384,7 @@ gf100_gr_intr(struct nvkm_gr *base)
nvkm_fifo_chan_put(device->fifo, flags, &chan);
}
-void
+static void
gf100_gr_init_fw(struct gf100_gr *gr, u32 fuc_base,
struct gf100_gr_fuc *code, struct gf100_gr_fuc *data)
{
@@ -1701,7 +1701,7 @@ gf100_gr_oneinit(struct nvkm_gr *base)
return 0;
}
-int
+static int
gf100_gr_init_(struct nvkm_gr *base)
{
struct gf100_gr *gr = gf100_gr(base);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gm107.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gm107.c
index 45f965f..2c67fac 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/n...
2016 Oct 22
18
[PATCH 01/17] drm/nouveau/core: add missing header dependencies
We get 2 warnings when building kernel with W=1:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/firmware.c:34:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvkm_firmware_get' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/firmware.c:58:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvkm_firmware_put' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
In fact, these functions are declared in
2016 Dec 13
15
[PATCH v2 0/15] Falcon library
This was the first step of the secure boot refactoring - as Ben asked for some
fixes, I now submit it as its own series to make it easier to review (and also
because rebasing secure boot on top of this takes time and I don't want to do
it until this is validated!).
This series attempts to factorize the duplicate falcon-related code into a
single library, using the existing nvkm_falcon
2016 Dec 06
9
[PATCH 0/8] Falcon library
This was the first step of the secure boot refactoring - as Ben asked for some
fixes, I now submit it as its own series to make it easier to review (and also
because rebasing secure boot on top of this takes time and I don't want to do
it until this is validated!).
This series attempts to factorize the duplicate falcon-related code into a
single library, using the existing nvkm_falcon