Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "gf100_bar_new".
2016 Dec 12
2
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: fix unknown chipset for GTX 1060
...a06..7c6eece 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/base.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/base.c
@@ -2209,6 +2209,34 @@ nv134_chipset = {
.fifo = gp100_fifo_new,
};
+static const struct nvkm_device_chip
+nv136_chipset = {
+ .name = "GP104",
+ .bar = gf100_bar_new,
+ .bios = nvkm_bios_new,
+ .bus = gf100_bus_new,
+ .devinit = gm200_devinit_new,
+ .fb = gp104_fb_new,
+ .fuse = gm107_fuse_new,
+ .gpio = gk104_gpio_new,
+ .i2c = gm200_i2c_new,
+ .ibus = gm200_ibus_new,
+ .imem = nv50_instmem_new,
+ .ltc = gp100_ltc_new,
+ .mc = gp100_mc_new,
+ .mmu = gf100_mmu_...
2017 Jan 22
1
[GP107 chipset][PATCH] Recognise GP107 chipset (GTX 1050/1050ti)
...ti cards. TESTED and WORKING on my computer with
my GPU (Gigabyte GTX 1050ti OC edition).
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/
base.c
gpu_nouveau_gp107.patch
2272a2273,2301
> static const struct nvkm_device_chip
> nv137_chipset = {
> .name = "GP107",
> .bar = gf100_bar_new,
> .bios = nvkm_bios_new,
> .bus = gf100_bus_new,
> .devinit = gm200_devinit_new,
> .fb = gp102_fb_new,
> .fuse = gm107_fuse_new,
> .gpio = gk104_gpio_new,
> .i2c = gm200_i2c_new,
> .ibus = gm200_ibus_new,
> .imem = nv50_instmem_new,
&g...
2017 Feb 14
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/core: recognise GP107 chipset
...0d6..d242431 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/base.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/base.c
@@ -2237,6 +2237,34 @@ nv136_chipset = {
.fifo = gp100_fifo_new,
};
+static const struct nvkm_device_chip
+nv137_chipset = {
+ .name = "GP107",
+ .bar = gf100_bar_new,
+ .bios = nvkm_bios_new,
+ .bus = gf100_bus_new,
+ .devinit = gm200_devinit_new,
+ .fb = gp104_fb_new,
+ .fuse = gm107_fuse_new,
+ .gpio = gk104_gpio_new,
+ .i2c = gm200_i2c_new,
+ .ibus = gm200_ibus_new,
+ .imem = nv50_instmem_new,
+ .ltc = gp100_ltc_new,
+ .mc = gp100_mc_new,
+ .mmu = gf100_mmu_...
2016 Dec 12
0
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: fix unknown chipset for GTX 1060
...veau/nvkm/engine/device/base.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/base.c
> @@ -2209,6 +2209,34 @@ nv134_chipset = {
> .fifo = gp100_fifo_new,
> };
>
> +static const struct nvkm_device_chip
> +nv136_chipset = {
> + .name = "GP104",
> + .bar = gf100_bar_new,
> + .bios = nvkm_bios_new,
> + .bus = gf100_bus_new,
> + .devinit = gm200_devinit_new,
> + .fb = gp104_fb_new,
> + .fuse = gm107_fuse_new,
> + .gpio = gk104_gpio_new,
> + .i2c = gm200_i2c_new,
> + .ibus = gm200_ibus_new,
> + .imem = nv50_instmem_new,
> + .ltc = gp100_...
2017 Feb 14
0
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/core: recognise GP107 chipset
.../device/base.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/base.c
> @@ -2237,6 +2237,34 @@ nv136_chipset = {
> .fifo = gp100_fifo_new,
> };
>
> +static const struct nvkm_device_chip
> +nv137_chipset = {
> + .name = "GP107",
> + .bar = gf100_bar_new,
> + .bios = nvkm_bios_new,
> + .bus = gf100_bus_new,
> + .devinit = gm200_devinit_new,
> + .fb = gp104_fb_new,
> + .fuse = gm107_fuse_new,
> + .gpio = gk104_gpio_new,
> + .i2c = gm200_i2c_new,
> + .ibus = gm200_ibus_new,
>...
2017 Jul 03
0
[PATCH] initial support (display-only) for GP108
...drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/base.c
index 7bdc7a5a..056701be 100644
--- a/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/base.c
+++ b/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/base.c
@@ -2321,6 +2321,35 @@ nv137_chipset = {
};
static const struct nvkm_device_chip
+nv138_chipset = {
+ .name = "GP108",
+ .bar = gf100_bar_new,
+ .bios = nvkm_bios_new,
+ .bus = gf100_bus_new,
+ .devinit = gm200_devinit_new,
+ .fb = gp102_fb_new,
+ .fuse = gm107_fuse_new,
+ .gpio = gk104_gpio_new,
+ .i2c = gm200_i2c_new,
+ .ibus = gm200_ibus_new,
+ .imem = nv50_instmem_new,
+ .ltc = gp100_ltc_new,
+ .mc = gp100_mc_new,
+ .mmu = gf100_mmu_...
2017 Sep 15
42
[RFC PATCH 00/29] Current State of my clk patches
Just wanted to post updated versions of my last series/patches. Reviews
welcomed.
It would be also nice if we agree on features I should focus upstreaming, so
that this work can be better splitted or reordered.
Sadly most of my patches depend on the rather big clk subdev rework and I think
those patches shows best, why I think this rework is actually needed and makes
things much easier to add