Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "getwithoperand".
Did you mean:
getwithoperands
2013 Apr 19
1
[LLVMdev] How to retrieve IntToPtr from StoreInst?
...c = dyn_cast <ConstantExpr>(op2)) {
// how to extract the Int Constant here?
}
}
The problem is that given ConstantExpr, i am not sure how to extract the
Int Constant operand.
According to http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1ConstantExpr.html, this
class only provides method such as getWithOperands(), but this method
doesnt seem to do what I want.
I grep through the code of LLVM, but cannot find any example doing this.
any more hint, please?
Thanks,
Jun
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/...
2012 Jan 27
3
[LLVMdev] How to get the string value?
Thanks Duncan,
Yes, it is a ConstantExpr! Thank you!
Now trying to find a clue in ConstantExpr's functions to get that string :-)
Regards,
Welson
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
> Hi Welson Sun,
>
> > Hi, if I have some LLVM code like this:
> >
> > @.str = private unnamed_addr constant [7 x i8]
2013 Apr 18
0
[LLVMdev] How to retrieve IntToPtr from StoreInst?
On 4/18/13 9:56 AM, Jun Koi wrote:
> hi,
>
> i am writing a simple LLVM pass to analyze the Store instruction.
> my pass derives from InstVisitor class, and the method to handle Store
> instruction is like this:
>
> void MyPass::visitStoreInst(StoreInst &I) {
> ...
> }
>
> It is pretty simple to handle Store. however, in on test i got an
> instruction like
2013 Apr 18
2
[LLVMdev] How to retrieve IntToPtr from StoreInst?
hi,
i am writing a simple LLVM pass to analyze the Store instruction.
my pass derives from InstVisitor class, and the method to handle Store
instruction is like this:
void MyPass::visitStoreInst(StoreInst &I) {
...
}
It is pretty simple to handle Store. however, in on test i got an
instruction like below:
store i8 %tmp5, i8* inttoptr (i32 301959828 to i8*)
the second operand is
2014 Sep 19
2
[LLVMdev] More careful treatment of floating point exceptions
Hi Sanjay,
Thanks, I saw this flag and it's definitely should be considered, but
it appeared to me to be static characteristic of target platform. I'm
not sure how appropriate it would be to change its value from a front-end.
It says "Has", while optional flag would rather say "Uses" meaning that
implementation cares about floating point exceptions.
Regards,
Sergey
2014 Sep 25
2
[LLVMdev] More careful treatment of floating point exceptions
...= false);
static Constant *getUDiv(Constant *C1, Constant *C2, bool isExact = false);
static Constant *getSDiv(Constant *C1, Constant *C2, bool isExact = false);
static Constant *getFDiv(Constant *C1, Constant *C2);
@@ -1013,7 +1015,8 @@ public:
///
/// \param OnlyIfReducedTy see \a getWithOperands() docs.
static Constant *get(unsigned Opcode, Constant *C1, Constant *C2,
- unsigned Flags = 0, Type *OnlyIfReducedTy = nullptr);
+ unsigned Flags = 0, Type *OnlyIfReducedTy = nullptr,
+ bool HonorFPExceptions = false);
///...