search for: gettyp

...stantUnion ctor or ConstantUnion::get should assert that the constant has type that matches one of the elements of the union. @@ -928,7 +949,7 @@ /// if the elements of the array are all ConstantInt's. bool ConstantArray::isString() const { // Check the element type for i8... - if (!getType()->getElementType()->isInteger(8)) + if (getType()->getElementType() != Type::getInt8Ty(getContext())) return false; // Check the elements to make sure they are all integers, not constant // expressions. You have a couple of these things which revert a recent patch, plea...

...nion::get should assert that the > constant has type that matches one of the elements of the union. > > @@ -928,7 +949,7 @@ > /// if the elements of the array are all ConstantInt's. > bool ConstantArray::isString() const { > // Check the element type for i8... > - if (!getType()->getElementType()->isInteger(8)) > + if (getType()->getElementType() != Type::getInt8Ty(getContext())) > return false; > // Check the elements to make sure they are all integers, not constant > // expressions. > > You have a couple of these things which revert...

...nion::get should assert that the > constant has type that matches one of the elements of the union. > > @@ -928,7 +949,7 @@ > /// if the elements of the array are all ConstantInt's. > bool ConstantArray::isString() const { > // Check the element type for i8... > - if (!getType()->getElementType()->isInteger(8)) > + if (getType()->getElementType() != Type::getInt8Ty(getContext())) > return false; > // Check the elements to make sure they are all integers, not constant > // expressions. > > You have a couple of these things which revert...

OK here's the patch for real this time :) On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > Here's a work in progress of the union patch. Note that the test "union.ll" > does not work, so you probably don't want to check this in as is. However, > I'd be interested in any feedback you're willing to give. > > -- > -- Talin

Here's a work in progress of the union patch. Note that the test "union.ll" does not work, so you probably don't want to check this in as is. However, I'd be interested in any feedback you're willing to give. -- -- Talin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Several instruction classes override getType() when the instruction always creates a particular type of value. For example, the result of insertelement is always a vector, so InsertElementInst overrides getType() to return a VectorType*. This makes perfect sense. However, ExtractValueInst and InsertValueInst override getType() to...

...unction. But I don't have any problems with my pass if I run clang -emit-llvm -S, then llc and then gcc. With this approach I get a binary with my instrumentation inserted. This line causes a problem - assert((i >= FTy->getNumParams() || FTy->getParamType(i) == Args[i]->getType()) && "Calling a function with a bad signature!"); I tried to get a dump of FTy->getParamType(i) and Args[i]->getType(), but I wasn't able to do it in gdb - everytime I create a breakpoint it just misses it. So I made the following: FTy->getParamType(i...

...the >> constant has type that matches one of the elements of the union. >> >> @@ -928,7 +949,7 @@ >> /// if the elements of the array are all ConstantInt's. >> bool ConstantArray::isString() const { >> // Check the element type for i8... >> - if (!getType()->getElementType()->isInteger(8)) >> + if (getType()->getElementType() != Type::getInt8Ty(getContext())) >> return false; >> // Check the elements to make sure they are all integers, not constant >> // expressions. >> >> You have a couple of t...

...he input bc file after -O3 optimization : > bzip2.del.opt.bc.tgz > > > Command to run on -O3 optimized file: llc -cppgen=program > bzip2.del.opt.bc > > Call stack: > > llc: Value.cpp:307: void > llvm::Value::replaceAllUsesWith(llvm::Value*): Assertion > `New->getType() == getType() && "replaceAllUses of value with new > value of different type!"' failed. > 0 llc 0x00000000014c716a > llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(_IO_FILE*) + 38 > 1 llc 0x00000000014c73d1 > 2 llc 0x00000000014c7718 > 3...

Hi, I want to create a double constant from a float constant, here's my code: auto* constFloat1 = static_cast<llvm::ConstantFP*>(llvm::ConstantFP::get(llvm::Type::getFloatTy(context), 3.1)); assert(constFloat1->getType() == llvm::Type::getFloatTy(context)); auto* constFloat2 = llvm::ConstantFP::get(llvm::Type::getDoubleTy(context), constFloat1->getValueAPF()); assert(constFloat2->getType() == llvm::Type::getDoubleTy(context)); but the second assert failed, the type of constFloat2 is still float, no...

...re -O3 optimization :bzip2.del.bc.tgz I have attached the input bc file after -O3 optimization : bzip2.del.opt.bc.tgz Command to run on -O3 optimized file: llc -cppgen=program bzip2.del.opt.bc Call stack: llc: Value.cpp:307: void llvm::Value::replaceAllUsesWith(llvm::Value*): Assertion `New->getType() == getType() && "replaceAllUses of value with new value of different type!"' failed. 0 llc 0x00000000014c716a llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(_IO_FILE*) + 38 1 llc 0x00000000014c73d1 2 llc 0x00000000014c7718 3 libpthread.so.0 0x00000033306...

...> >>> >>> Command to run on -O3 optimized file: llc -cppgen=program >>> bzip2.del.opt.bc >>> >>> Call stack: >>> >>> llc: Value.cpp:307: void >>> llvm::Value::replaceAllUsesWith(llvm::Value*): Assertion >>> `New->getType() == getType() && "replaceAllUses of value with new >>> value of different type!"' failed. >>> 0 llc 0x00000000014c716a >>> llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(_IO_FILE*) + 38 >>> 1 llc 0x00000000014c73d1 >>> 2 ll...

...would you please clarify some problems I have? 1. If I see this instruction in the function. %S.i = alloca %struct.SimpleStruct Suppose SimpleStruct is as following: struct.SimpleStruct = type { int, double } When I read the instruction, how can I know the type of simplstruct, should I use 'getType' member function like Inst.getType()? If I use that, I will get a PointerType, how can I use it? 2. Another question is that since we do the scalar replacement on each function. If the program look like this. struct s { int a; float b; } fun1( struct s *ps) { ps->a = 1; ps-&gt...

...: >> bzip2.del.opt.bc.tgz >> >> >> Command to run on -O3 optimized file: llc -cppgen=program >> bzip2.del.opt.bc >> >> Call stack: >> >> llc: Value.cpp:307: void >> llvm::Value::replaceAllUsesWith(llvm::Value*): Assertion >> `New->getType() == getType() && "replaceAllUses of value with new >> value of different type!"' failed. >> 0 llc 0x00000000014c716a >> llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(_IO_FILE*) + 38 >> 1 llc 0x00000000014c73d1 >> 2 llc 0x0000...

...ile the attached program with clang: $ clang -fno-strict-aliasing -target mips64el-unknown-linux -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -S test1.c -o test1.ll -emit-llvm It asserts when LoopVectorize.cpp:506 is executed. It looks like it is complaining because it is trying to zero-extend an i64 (type Count->getType() returns i64) to an i32 (IdxTy). if (Count->getType() != IdxTy) { // The exit count can be of pointer type. Convert it to the correct // integer type. if (ExitCount->getType()->isPointerTy()) Count = CastInst::CreatePointerCast(Count, IdxTy, "ptrcnt.to.int",...

I want to know the type of pointer . for example if we have int *p, struct node *w char *q then i want int for p,char for q , struct node for w. any help would be appreciated. -- View this message in context: http://llvm.1065342.n5.nabble.com/How-To-Get-The-Name-of-the-type-the-popinter-is-pointing-to-tp49121.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

i am using llvm , i did this if ( AllocaInst *allocInst = dyn_cast<AllocaInst>(&*bbit)){ PointerType *p = allocInst->getType(); if ( p->getElementType()->isPointerTy()){ StringRef name = allocInst->getName(); Type *type = allocInst->getOperand(0)->getType();;...

...ct.S", where $struct.S is defined as a struct %struct.S = type { i32, i32 } I'm using the following loop: for(inst_iterator i = inst_begin(F), e = inst_end(F); i!= e; i++) { AllocaInst* ai; if( (ai = dyn_cast<AllocaInst>(&*i))){ if(ai->getOperand(0)->getType()->getTypeID() == Type::StructTyID) allocs.push_back(ai); } } However, I had the impression that the type comparison can be done by a pointer comparison. Can anyone please suggest me a better way to do it? Also, I want to get the size of %struct.S, should I use the following co...

...s to use both methods, get ALL struct allocation and a SPECIFIC struct allocation, at different situations. Here, I've got a couple of more questions. 1. For getting ALL struct allocation, when I use if( (AI = dyn_cast<AllocaInst>(&*i))) if(AI->getOperand(0)->getType()->getTypeID() == Type::StructTyID) { to get all alloca instructions allocating a structure, it does not work. In my gdb session, I've got the following dumps: (gdb) call AI->dump() %s = alloca %struct.S ; <%struct.S*> [#uses=4] (gdb) call AI->getOperand(0)-...

...e() operator for this but I'll > > appreciate any hints. > Why do you need this? Won't be enough just to compare function types? I do something like this: static bool areSame(Instruction *A, Instruction *B) { if (A->getOpcode() != B->getOpcode()) return false; if (A->getType()->getTypeID() != B->getType()->getTypeID()) return false; unsigned int a = A->getNumOperands(); if (a != B->getNumOperands()) return false; for (unsigned int i = 0; i < a; ++i) if (A->getOperand(i)->getType()->getTypeID() != B->getOperand(i)->getTy...