search for: gettoken

Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches for "gettoken".

Did you mean: get_token
2006 May 17
3
Autocomplete GetToken??
Hi, I needing to modify the control.js file and am confused about what the purpose of the getToken function is. I read the docs section below and still don''t understand why it doesn''t just access the form.value directly. Docs say: This method should get the text for which to provide autocompletion by invoking this.getToken(), NOT by directly accessing this.element.value. This...
2006 May 18
1
RE: Rails-spinoffs Digest, Vol 12, Issue 29
...e so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Rails-spinoffs digest..." Today''s Topics: 1. Display Images from URL in Database (Ben Lisbakken) 2. How to send data using prototype (Fernando) 3. RE: How to send data using prototype (Martinez, Andrew) 4. Autocomplete GetToken?? (Daniel Elmore) 5. Re: Autocomplete GetToken?? (Andrew Tetlaw) 6. RE: Autocomplete GetToken?? (Daniel Elmore) 7. Re: Display Images from URL in Database (Rongzhong Lu) 8. Re: Prototype & Scriptaculous vs. Yahoo UI Library (Peter Michaux) 9. Re: Prototype & Scriptaculous vs....
2006 Jun 19
2
Autocompleter enhancement feature request
...ress", this.onKeyPress.bindAsEventListener(this)); Event.observe(this.element, "focus", this.onKeyPress.bindAsEventListener(this)); The last line is what I have added. And then I have commented some code: onObserverEvent: function() { this.changed = false; // if(this.getToken().length>=this.options.minChars) { this.startIndicator(); this.getUpdatedChoices(); // } else { // this.active = false; // this.hide(); // } }, These changes are not in the best tradition of programming, but I am a javascript newbie and as a preliminary step I...
2006 Mar 17
1
Autocompleter.Local problem/desparate plea for help...
...r.Local(''article_keywords'',''auto_complete'', opts , { tokens: new Array('' '','','',''\n''), /* start selector */ selector: function(instance) { var ret = []; // Beginning matches var entry = instance.getToken (); var firstMatch= -1; for (var i = 0; i < instance.options.array.length; i++) { var wasMatch = false; var elem = instance.options.array[i]; var foundPos = instance.options.ignoreCase ? elem.toLowerCase().indexOf(entry.toLowerCase()) : elem.indexOf(entry); while (foun...
2012 Oct 17
3
[LLVMdev] Hexagon Assembly parser question
...em like there is a lot of work that has been done to make this parsing straightforward. But.. Hexagon assembly does not follow the "Mnemonic Rx Rx ." format that is expected by the assembly parsing infrastructure, represented by: StringRef Mnemonic = ((ARMOperand*)Operands[0])->getToken(); This Mnemonic location assumption applies to both the Tablegen Backend AsmMatcherEmitter processing, and the .inc file it produces where MatchInstructionImpl is the entry point by which the assembly input is parsed. However Hexagon assembly has some features that make it more readable,...
2006 May 22
8
flickr tag question
hey, i am using the flickr wrapper for ruby and need to access the tags of a specific photo. i got all the rest working. i must admit i am kind of new to ruby, but i tried and tried and couldn''t figure it out. among other things i want to read geotags like in my example here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/whoisstan/146634506/ i''m sure it is deadsimple and i just overlooked it.
2005 Aug 10
1
Issues with Canoo WebTest
...er definition for Window.setTimeout(); line 1) [canoo] at org.mozilla.javascript.NativeGlobal.constructError (NativeGlobal.java:597) [canoo] at org.mozilla.javascript.TokenStream.reportSyntaxError(TokenStream.java: 1324) [canoo] at org.mozilla.javascript.TokenStream.getToken (TokenStream.java:1302) [canoo] at org.mozilla.javascript.Parser.memberExprTail (Parser.java:1213) [canoo] at org.mozilla.javascript.Parser.memberExpr (Parser.java:1204) [canoo] at org.mozilla.javascript.Parser.unaryExpr (Parser.java:1115) [canoo] at org.mozi...
2012 Oct 17
0
[LLVMdev] Hexagon Assembly parser question
...ke there is a lot of work that has been done to make this parsing straightforward. > > But…. > Hexagon assembly does not follow the “Mnemonic Rx Rx …” format that is expected by the assembly parsing infrastructure, represented by: > StringRef Mnemonic = ((ARMOperand*)Operands[0])->getToken(); > > This Mnemonic location assumption applies to both the Tablegen Backend AsmMatcherEmitter processing, and the .inc file it produces where MatchInstructionImpl is the entry point by which the assembly input is parsed. > > However Hexagon assembly has some features that make it...
2009 Jul 07
0
[PATCH server] Update app to work with rails 2.3.2
...rovide, at the very least, // a getUpdatedChoices function that will be invoked every time -// the text inside the monitored textbox changes. This method +// the text inside the monitored textbox changes. This method // should get the text for which to provide autocompletion by // invoking this.getToken(), NOT by directly accessing // this.element.value. This is to allow incremental tokenized @@ -30,23 +30,23 @@ // will incrementally autocomplete with a comma as the token. // Additionally, ',' in the above example can be replaced with // a token array, e.g. { tokens: [',', '...
2009 Jul 20
9
Upgrade server to run on Rails 2.3.2/F11
Note that one of the 8 patches (#6) will be sent separately in reply to this email, as some of the replaced lines are too long, so git won't let me send the email. However, there is nothing wrong with that patch, and it should be applied in the sequence listed below. Note also that I assume this will be tested on a clean f11 install, rather than an upgrade of an existing ovirt server
2018 Sep 28
3
error: expected memory with 32-bit signed offset
Hi, I want to encode Loongson ISA initially https://gist.github.com/xiangzhai/8ae6966e2f02a94e180dd16ff1cd60ac gslbx           $2,0($3,$4) It is equivalent to: dadd $1, $3, $4 lb $2,0($1) I just use  mem_simmptr  as the default value of  DAGOperand MO , because  MipsMemAsmOperand  use  parseMemOperand  to parse general  MemOffset  and only *one*  AnyRegister , for example: 0($1) But 
2007 Jul 05
2
[LLVMdev] PATCH (rest of code changes) "bytecode" --> "bitcode"
Here is the bulk of the sanitizing. My residual doubts center around the question whether we still do/want to support (un)compressed *byte*code in 2.0/2.1. I need a definitive word on this to proceed. My understanding is that bytecode is already gone, but there are still some functions/enums that really deal with *byte*code (instead of *bit*code). I did not touch those areas, so the attached
2007 Apr 30
1
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc build broken
...initializer before `*' token /projects/compiler/llvm-gcc/gcc/llvm-backend.cpp:90: error: expected initializer before `*' token /projects/compiler/llvm-gcc/gcc/llvm-backend.cpp: In function `void llvm_initialize_backend()': /projects/compiler/llvm-gcc/gcc/llvm-backend.cpp:121: error: `getToken' was not declared in this scope /projects/compiler/llvm-gcc/gcc/llvm-backend.cpp:129: error: `cl' has not been declared /projects/compiler/llvm-gcc/gcc/llvm-backend.cpp:131: error: invalid use of undefined type `struct llvm::Module' /projects/compiler/llvm-gcc/gcc/llvm-internal.h:45:...