Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "getthingi".
Did you mean:
getthingy
2019 Feb 13
3
changing variable naming rules in LLVM codebase
I want to reiterate the benefit that underscore_names would bring. To be
clear it's not my favorite style, but it does have a very concrete
advantage which is that we have a very large subproject already using it.
it doesn't make sense to do a purely aesthetic move that not everyone is
going to agree on anyway, when we could do one with actual tangible value.
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 8:52
2019 Feb 13
4
changing variable naming rules in LLVM codebase
FWIW, I'm pretty strongly opposed to humbleCamelCase. We already use that
style so something else. One of the biggest advantages of changing the
variable naming convention would be to differentiate variables from other
constructs IMO, and that's the nature of many examples here.
Using underscore_names for variables as Zach suggests would,, onhe other
hand, be a significant improvement
2019 Feb 14
5
changing variable naming rules in LLVM codebase
I have to agree with Paul that I think it is rather useful to have a naming
convention that distinguishes class members from locals, etc. I'm not sure
what that would look like, whether an m prefix for data members would be
something others would entertain, but something that makes it clear would
probably be useful. To use Paul's example, I think that mTheStuff vs.
TheStuff makes it super