search for: getstartloc

...ke a look: int foo1 (int *a, int *b, int n) { int i, s= 0; for (i = 0; i < n; i++) { s = s * a[i]; } for (i = 0; i < n; i++) { b[i] = a[i] + 3; s += a[i]; } return s; } In this case, using the line obtained by this one in the LLVM's IR: Line = l->getStartLoc().getLine(); The source file is cloned, and I'm writing my annotations inside the loop now. I can't do several modifications in the struct of code, just the necessary, thats the problem. Regards, Gleison 2016-02-03 1:07 GMT-02:00 Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com>: > &...

...t; for (i = 0; i < n; i++) { >> >> b[i] = a[i] + 3; >> >> s += a[i]; >> >> } >> >> return s; >> >> } >> >> In this case, using the line obtained by this one in the LLVM's IR: >> >> Line = l->getStartLoc().getLine(); >> >> The source file is cloned, and I'm writing my annotations inside the loop >> now. >> I can't do several modifications in the struct of code, just the >> necessary, thats the problem. >> >> Regards, >> >> Gleison &g...

Hi Alex, I think the changes you want are actually not vectorizer related. Vectorizer just uses data provided by other passes. What you probably might want is to look into routine Loop::getStartLoc() (see lib/Analysis/LoopInfo.cpp). If you find a way to improve it, patches are welcome:) Thanks, Michael > On Jun 3, 2016, at 6:13 PM, Alex Susu <alex.e.susu at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello. > Mikhail, I come back to this older thread. > I need to do a few changes to...

Dear LLVMers, I am trying to implement a particular type of loop optimization, but I am having problems with global variables. To solve this problem, I would like to know if LLVM has some pass that moves loads outside loops. I will illustrate with an example. I want to transform this code below. I am writing in C for readability, but I am analysing LLVM IR: int *vectorE; void foo (int n) {

Hi Alex, I'm not aware of efforts on loop coalescing in LLVM, but probably polly can do something like this. Also, one related thought: it might be worth making it a separate pass, not a part of loop vectorizer. LLVM already has several 'utility' passes (e.g. loop rotation), which primarily aims at enabling other passes. Thanks, Michael > On Feb 15, 2016, at 6:44 AM, RCU