search for: getrepregclasscostfor

...igned something else than an MVT. Are there any general objections to replace EVT with MVT in these cases? For example, a quick look at TargetLowering.h give me this list of (member) functions, taking an EVT parameter, that asserts if the argument is not an MVT: getRegClassFor, getRepRegClassFor, getRepRegClassCostFor, setTypeAction, getLoadExtAction, isLoadExtLegal, getTruncStoreAction, isTruncStoreLegal, getIndexedLoadAction, getIndexedStoreAction, getCondCodeAction, getTypeToPromoteTo, addRegisterClass Regards, Patrik Hägglund -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: &l...

...| 4 ++-- lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.h | 2 +- 6 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) commit bd7d8621c38ddca079b8820dd532fd5b616f25da Author: Patrik Hägglund <patrik.h.hagglund at ericsson.com> Date: Tue Dec 4 11:02:16 2012 +0100 Change TargetLowering::getRepRegClassCostFor, getIndexedLoadAction, getIndexedStoreAction, and addRegisterClass to take and MVT, instead of EVT. include/llvm/Target/TargetLowering.h | 33 +++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) commit 1c1a80ce4db07988a839af7aa7a58acd6164364f Author: Patrik...

...han an MVT. Are there any general objections to replace EVT with MVT in these cases? > > For example, a quick look at TargetLowering.h give me this list of (member) functions, taking an EVT parameter, that asserts if the argument is not an MVT: > > getRegClassFor, getRepRegClassFor, getRepRegClassCostFor, setTypeAction, getLoadExtAction, isLoadExtLegal, getTruncStoreAction, isTruncStoreLegal, getIndexedLoadAction, getIndexedStoreAction, getCondCodeAction, getTypeToPromoteTo, addRegisterClass > Please do. MVT is cheaper than EVT and conceptually cleaner when dealing with physical machine type...