Displaying 20 results from an estimated 26 matches for "getpermanentlibrari".
Did you mean:
getpermanentlibrary
2012 Oct 22
5
[LLVMdev] dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: fast lazy bind offset out of range
On Oct 22, 2012, at 11:34 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Nick,
> I have uploaded the full walk with 'set env DYLD_PRINT_INITIALIZERS'. It didn't seem very informative
> as the dyld error occurs right after...
>
> (gdb)
> llvm::sys::DynamicLibrary::getPermanentLibrary (filename=0x142903da8 "/sw/opt/llvm-3.2/lib/LLVMPolly.so", errMsg=0x7fff5fbfe6e0) at
2012 Oct 23
1
[LLVMdev] dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: fast lazy bind offset out of range
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:40:32AM -0700, Nick Kledzik wrote:
>
> On Oct 22, 2012, at 11:34 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
> > Nick,
> > I have uploaded the full walk with 'set env DYLD_PRINT_INITIALIZERS'. It didn't seem very informative
> > as the dyld error occurs right after...
> >
> > (gdb)
> >
2012 Oct 22
2
[LLVMdev] dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: fast lazy bind offset out of range
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 06:00:36PM -0700, Nick Kledzik wrote:
> Jack,
>
> Some binary has an initializer which dyld is calling. Somehow the initializer gets to:
> #4 0x0000000100f3b2c0 in Json::Value::maxUInt ()
> which is calling a function in another dylib for the first time. When you call a function in another dylib, you actually jump through a (lazy) pointer. The pointer
2012 Oct 22
0
[LLVMdev] dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: fast lazy bind offset out of range
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 09:48:59AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 06:00:36PM -0700, Nick Kledzik wrote:
> > Jack,
> >
> > Some binary has an initializer which dyld is calling. Somehow the initializer gets to:
> > #4 0x0000000100f3b2c0 in Json::Value::maxUInt ()
> > which is calling a function in another dylib for the first time. When you
2012 Oct 23
0
[LLVMdev] dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: fast lazy bind offset out of range
On Oct 23, 2012, at 12:50 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:40:32AM -0700, Nick Kledzik wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 22, 2012, at 11:34 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>
>>> Nick,
>>> I have uploaded the full walk with 'set env DYLD_PRINT_INITIALIZERS'. It didn't seem very informative
>>> as the dyld error occurs right after...
2012 Oct 10
0
[LLVMdev] DynamicLibrary::UnloadLibrary()
Hi,
We need to support unloading of shared libraries. I'd like to continue
using sys::DynamicLibrary. Few questions:
* Is there a fundamental reason not to implement UnloadLibrary?
* Would it be necessary to implement some fancy symbol use-check for
unloading, or would it be fine to make this a "use at your own risk"
operation? At least as a first implementation?
* I would also
2012 Oct 21
2
[LLVMdev] dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: fast lazy bind offset out of range
Nick,
While enhancing the fink llvm32 packaging to support the polly tool, I ran into
a dyld failure when the dragonegg plugin tries to load LLVMPolly.so plugin...
dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: fast lazy bind offset out of range (39257, max=7640) in image /sw/lib/gcc4.7/libexec/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin11.4.2/4.7.2/cc1
dyld: fast lazy bind offset out of range (39257, max=7640) in image
2012 Oct 22
0
[LLVMdev] dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: fast lazy bind offset out of range
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:17:56AM -0700, Nick Kledzik wrote:
> Jack,
>
> I looks like the code is calling dlopen() on LLVMPolly.so and it or something it links against has an initializer. The initialer is run before dlopen() returns and the crash is in the initializer. The message:
>
> dyld: fast lazy bind offset out of range (53437, max=7640) in image
2012 Oct 13
2
[LLVMdev] Dynamically loading native code generated from LLVM IR
Kaylor,
do you have some good documented example code which shows the usage of
the MCJIT ?
This would help a lot ... the sematic of lots of API calls are not
intuitively understandable.
Best Regards
--Armin
Kaylor, Andrew wrote:
> I'm not sure I understand your use case, but MCJIT (as opposed to the legacy JIT) does almost exactly what you're asking for. It generates an
2012 Oct 12
5
[LLVMdev] Dynamically loading native code generated from LLVM IR
Hi,
I'm building LLVM IR. I'd like to compile this IR to native code (I don't want JIT) and immediately load it to execute. So far, I've the following:
1) I can emit the IR to native assembly/object file doing the same thing llc does (using TargetMachine::addPassesToEmitFile).
2) I can dynamically load a precompiled .so file (using llvm::sys::DynamicLibrary::getPermanentLibrary),
2012 Oct 13
0
[LLVMdev] Dynamically loading native code generated from LLVM IR
I'm not sure I understand your use case, but MCJIT (as opposed to the legacy JIT) does almost exactly what you're asking for. It generates an in-memory object file image (using addPassesToEmitMC) and then loads and links it for execution.
If there's some particular detail you don't like in the way this is happening, you might be able to generate a file as you have and then use
2012 Oct 13
2
[LLVMdev] Dynamically loading native code generated from LLVM IR
Daniel,
I didn't find the MCJIT directory under unitests/ExecutionEngine ...
there is only a directory called JIT.
You mean this directory ?
Many thanks
--Armin
Malea, Daniel wrote:
> Take a look at the MCJIT unit tests under unittests/ExecutionEngine/MCJIT
>
> The MCJITTestBase class does the majority of the interactions with the LLVM API you're referring to.
>
>
2012 Oct 22
0
[LLVMdev] dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: fast lazy bind offset out of range
Jack,
Some binary has an initializer which dyld is calling. Somehow the initializer gets to:
#4 0x0000000100f3b2c0 in Json::Value::maxUInt ()
which is calling a function in another dylib for the first time. When you call a function in another dylib, you actually jump through a (lazy) pointer. The pointer initially points to a helper which loads an index parameter specifying which function to
2012 Oct 13
0
[LLVMdev] Dynamically loading native code generated from LLVM IR
Take a look at the MCJIT unit tests under unittests/ExecutionEngine/MCJIT
The MCJITTestBase class does the majority of the interactions with the LLVM API you're referring to.
Good luck,
Dan
On 2012-10-13, at 4:57 AM, "Armin Steinhoff" <as at steinhoff-automation.com> wrote:
>
> Kaylor,
>
> do you have some good documented example code which shows the usage of
2012 Oct 23
0
[LLVMdev] dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: fast lazy bind offset out of range
Hi,
> I looks like the code is calling dlopen() on LLVMPolly.so and it or something it links against has an initializer. The initialer is run before dlopen() returns and the crash is in the initializer. The message:
>
> dyld: fast lazy bind offset out of range (53437, max=7640) in image /sw/lib/gcc4.7/libexec/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin12.2.0/4.7.2/cc1
>
> means the initializer
2012 Oct 23
2
[LLVMdev] dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: fast lazy bind offset out of range
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 01:05:04PM -0700, Nick Kledzik wrote:
> On Oct 23, 2012, at 12:50 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:40:32AM -0700, Nick Kledzik wrote:
> >>
> >> On Oct 22, 2012, at 11:34 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> >>
> >>> Nick,
> >>> I have uploaded the full walk with 'set env
2012 Oct 22
5
[LLVMdev] dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: fast lazy bind offset out of range
Jack,
I looks like the code is calling dlopen() on LLVMPolly.so and it or something it links against has an initializer. The initialer is run before dlopen() returns and the crash is in the initializer. The message:
dyld: fast lazy bind offset out of range (53437, max=7640) in image /sw/lib/gcc4.7/libexec/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin12.2.0/4.7.2/cc1
means the initializer called something which
2012 Oct 13
0
[LLVMdev] Dynamically loading native code generated from LLVM IR
It's definitely there. It was added in r165246 recently so you
probably have an older version.
Amara
On 13 October 2012 23:02, Armin Steinhoff <as at steinhoff-automation.com> wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> I didn't find the MCJIT directory under unitests/ExecutionEngine ... there
> is only a directory called JIT.
> You mean this directory ?
>
> Many thanks
>
>
2012 Aug 30
1
[LLVMdev] Problems building llvm on AIX
Hi,
Has anyone succeeded in building llvm on AIX?
Currently I am investigating several tools for code analyses and I came upon Clang. We at CCV run our core business applications on RS6000/AIX. At our department we develop those applications.
The reviews on clang look very promising. I was able to build and run it on Linux (SuSE 12.1) without any problems. I tested it with valgrind sources and
2012 Oct 12
1
[LLVMdev] Dynamically loading native code generated from LLVM IR
Tim Northover wrote:
> Hi Baris,
>
>> If I could produce a .so file in step 1, my problem would be solved. llc has a "-relocation-model=pic" option, but the file produced with that did not dynamically load.
> That relocation-model=pic option usually necessary for a linker to be
> able to produce a .so file (it changes how variables are addressed so
> that more things