search for: getnumimplicitdefs

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "getnumimplicitdefs".

2012 Aug 15
5
[LLVMdev] More Back-End Porting Troubles
.../home/scheler/git/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/InstrEmitter.cpp:704: void llvm::InstrEmitter::EmitMachineNode(llvm::SDNode*, bool, bool, llvm::DenseMap<llvm::SDValue, unsigned int>&): Assertion `NumMIOperands >= II.getNumOperands() && NumMIOperands <= II.getNumOperands()+II.getNumImplicitDefs() && "#operands for dag node doesn't match .td file!"' failed. Currently, I am not even able to find out which instruction is messed up here (dumping the node via the dump-Method yields "<<Unknown Machine Node #65434>>"). Can I use "machine nod...
2012 Aug 15
0
[LLVMdev] More Back-End Porting Troubles
...vm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/InstrEmitter.cpp:704: > void llvm::InstrEmitter::EmitMachineNode(llvm::SDNode*, bool, bool, > llvm::DenseMap<llvm::SDValue, unsigned int>&): Assertion > `NumMIOperands >= II.getNumOperands() && NumMIOperands <= > II.getNumOperands()+II.getNumImplicitDefs() && "#operands for dag node > doesn't match .td file!"' failed. > > Currently, I am not even able to find out which instruction is messed > up here (dumping the node via the dump-Method yields "<<Unknown > Machine Node #65434>>"). Ca...
2012 Aug 16
2
[LLVMdev] More Back-End Porting Troubles
...electionDAG/InstrEmitter.cpp:704: >> void llvm::InstrEmitter::EmitMachineNode(llvm::SDNode*, bool, bool, >> llvm::DenseMap<llvm::SDValue, unsigned int>&): Assertion >> `NumMIOperands >= II.getNumOperands() && NumMIOperands <= >> II.getNumOperands()+II.getNumImplicitDefs() && "#operands for dag node >> doesn't match .td file!"' failed. >> >> Currently, I am not even able to find out which instruction is messed >> up here (dumping the node via the dump-Method yields "<<Unknown >> Machine Node #65434...
2012 Aug 16
0
[LLVMdev] More Back-End Porting Troubles
...tter.cpp:704: > >> void llvm::InstrEmitter::EmitMachineNode(llvm::SDNode*, bool, bool, > >> llvm::DenseMap<llvm::SDValue, unsigned int>&): Assertion > >> `NumMIOperands >= II.getNumOperands() && NumMIOperands <= > >> II.getNumOperands()+II.getNumImplicitDefs() && "#operands for dag > >> node doesn't match .td file!"' failed. > >> > >> Currently, I am not even able to find out which instruction is messed > >> up here (dumping the node via the dump-Method yields "<<Unknown > &gt...