search for: getnum

...alue (0: no timeout) + mov eax,[menu_timeout] ; timeout value (0: no timeout) call far [gfx_bc_input] ret @@ -786,6 +785,42 @@ do_default: .noparm: ret +do_timeout: + call skipspace + jz .eof + jc .noparm + call ungetc + push es + push di + push cs + pop es + mov di,NumBuf +.getnum: + cmp di,NumBufEnd + jae .loaded + call getc + stosb + cmp al,'-' + jnb .getnum + call ungetc + dec di +.loaded: + mov byte [di],0 + pop di + pop es + push cs + pop ds + mov si,NumBuf + push ebx + call parseint + jc .err + mov [menu_timeout],ebx +.err: + pop ebx +.eof: +...

...ailing in the LLVM cvs version, but not in LLVM 1.1. The generated code fails a check in the x86 peephole optimizer: llc: PeepholeOptimizer.cpp:128: bool <unnamed>::PH::PeepholeOptimize(llvm::Machi neBasicBlock&, llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::MachineInstr>&): Assertion `MI->getNum Operands() == 2 && "These should all have 2 operands!"' failed. I've tracked it down to a difference between LLVM cvs and LLVM 1.1 in PeepholeOptimizer.cpp: In LLVM 1.1, PeepholeOptimizer.cpp: line 70: case X86::ADDri16: case X86::ADDri32: case X86::SUBri16: ca...

...r 1 is not valid for DUNDi query results for ID 879!* though it should return some results , it failed in getting those . foloowing is my DIALPLAN exten => s,n,Set(ID=${DUNDIQUERY(${NUMBER},priv,b)}) exten => s,n,NoOp(DUNDI-QUERY-ID [ ${ID} ]) exten => s,n,Set(NUM=${DUNDIRESULT(${ID},getnum)}) exten => s,n,NoOp(There are [ ${NUM} ] dundi results) regards Dhaval -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100313/49b4372b/attachment.htm

...numbering schemes that the poviders use. I've been using the following [enum] template in my outbound route for quite some time with great success until recently. [enum](!) exten => _X.,n,Set(ARRAY(i,id)=1,${ENUMQUERY(+${EXTEN},ALL,e164.org)}) exten => _X.,n,Set(max=${ENUMRESULT(${id},getnum)}) exten => _X.,n,While($["${i}" <= "${max}"]) exten => _X.,n,Set(uri=${ENUMRESULT(${id},${i})}) exten => _X.,n,Exec(${IF($["${uri:0:3}" = "sip"]?Dial(SIP/${uri:4},40,KL(7200000:120000)T):NoOp(ENUM URI is not of type SIP))}) exten => _X.,n,Ex...

...03-02 13:31:36.130] -- Executing [myextn:2222222222:1111111111:30 at context:4] Set("IAX2/trunk-12353", "CALLERID(num)=2222222222") in new stack [2010-03-02 13:31:36.130] -- Executing [myextn:2222222222:1111111111:30 at context:5] Goto("IAX2/trunk-12353", "GetNum") in new stack [2010-03-02 13:31:36.131] -- Goto (context,myextn:2222222222:1111111111:30,7) [2010-03-02 13:31:36.131] -- Executing [myextn:2222222222:1111111111:30 at context:7] Set("IAX2/trunk-12353", "MyNumber=1111111111") in new stack [2010-03-02 13:31:36.131]...

Hi all, I have been beating my head against this problem for a bit, but I can't figure it out. I have a series of strings of variable length, and each will have one or more numbers, of varying format. E.g., I might have: tmpstr = "The first number is: 32. Another one is: 32.1. Here's a number in scientific format, 0.3523e10, and another, 0.3523e-10, and a negative,