search for: getnames

Hello, I'm new to llvm development and I have a question which I think should be straight forward, but I am having trouble figuring it out. I want to be able to access the return variable name for an instruction. For some instructions I can get this value through the "getName" method. For example, with the instruction: > %arg11 = bitcast i32* %arg1 to i8*, !dbg !42, !id

On Tuesday 04 August 2009 18:24, Chris Lattner wrote: > The big issue is things like this: > > DOUT << foo.getName() << "\n"; > > When -debug is disable and even when assertions are turned off, > foo.getName() is still called. When you use: Yep, that's a problem. > DEBUG(errs() << foo.getName() << "\n"); > > When

Hi, I'm trying to replace function call with call to wrapper(function_name, num_args, ...), where varargs hold args of original call. Function* launch = Function::Create( TypeBuilder<int(const char*, int, ...), false>::get(context), GlobalValue::ExternalLinkage, "kernelgen_launch_", m2); { CallInst* call = dyn_cast<CallInst>(cast<Value>(I)); if

At 2013-07-22 01:40:31,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >On 07/21/2013 09:49 AM, Star Tan wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> >> I have attached a patch file to reduce the polly-detect overhead. > >Great. > >> My idea is to avoid calling TypeFinder in Non-DEBUG mode, so >> TypeFinder is only called in DEBUG mode with the DEBUG

On 07/21/2013 09:49 AM, Star Tan wrote: > Hi all, > > > I have attached a patch file to reduce the polly-detect overhead. Great. > My idea is to avoid calling TypeFinder in Non-DEBUG mode, so > TypeFinder is only called in DEBUG mode with the DEBUG macro. This > patch file did this work with following modifications: > > > First, it keeps most of string information

Hi, I am trying to compile the Hello World pass (described at http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html#basiccode) in an LLVM Project and I get an error, 'no match for ‘operator<<’ at line llvm::cerr << "*Hello: *" << F.getName() << "\n"; But when I looked up in the LLVM API Documentation, I think "<<" operator is not overloaded

How can I get the name of the virtual Registers present on an instruction. eg. %add18 = add nsw i32 %mul17, %37 in this case I want to extract the name of the virutal registers as "add18", "mul17","37". This can easily be done in the case of store Instruction eg. store i32 %add20, i32* %t, align 4 in this case functions like

Hi John, %4 is not returned, because it's a temp register value and not a named variable. But you can implement something like the code below to get this value. (Not the most elegant, but more or less working solution). static std::string getName(Instruction* i) { if(i->getOpcode() == Instruction::Store) { return

This could be really trivial, but I cannot find the right function to get the name of an object as a character. Assume we have a function like: getName <- function(obj) Now if we call the function like: getName(blabla) and 'blabla' is not a defined object, I want getName to return "blabla". In other word, if paste("blabla") returns "blabla" I

Are these libs compatible ? At the very least I''d like to be able to use Prototype &amp; Dojo ? Thoughts welcome.. Matt _______________________________________________ Rails-spinoffs mailing list Rails-spinoffs-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs

Hi, I'm trying to use CallGraphSCCPass, but I keep getting a bus error. I can reproduce the problem quite easily using the lib/Transforms/Hello example. I simply mix in these changes: #include "llvm/CallGraphSCCPass.h" ... struct Hello : public CallGraphSCCPass { static char ID; // Pass identification, replacement for typeid Hello() : CallGraphSCCPass(&ID) {}

Following up on my introduction of the StringRef type, I wanted to clean up the API for getting and setting the name of an llvm::Value. There are a number of problems with the current API: 1. There are too many ...Name methods. 2. getName() returns an std::string, which is expensive. 3. getName() is frequently used to derive new names, which are passed to setName(). Currently this uses

Hi Trevor, > struct Hello : public CallGraphSCCPass { > static char ID; // Pass identification, replacement for typeid > Hello() : CallGraphSCCPass(&ID) {} > virtual bool runOnSCC(std::vector<CallGraphNode *> &SCC) { > CallGraphNode *node = SCC.front(); > Function *function = node->getFunction(); >

Hi Dimitry, This makes sense if you think about it from the perspective that the string you want passing must be passed at runtime, and so can't use a const char * from compile time. You need to make the string visible in the compiled image, and use that as the argument. A string is an array of 8-bit integers, so you need to create a ConstantArray. Value *v = ConstantArray::get(Context,

Can anyone tell how to get the result name or instruction name of all instruction? For example if the instruction is "x=add y,z", here i need "x". Using getName(), i am getting some instructions result name, but llvm produces some instruction like "%0=add i32 tmp, 1", here getName() shows empty string as result name. So please help. John Criswell wrote: > >

On 07/21/2013 07:33 PM, Star Tan wrote: > At 2013-07-22 01:40:31,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > >> On 07/21/2013 09:49 AM, Star Tan wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> >>> I have attached a patch file to reduce the polly-detect overhead. >> >> Great. >> >>> My idea is to avoid calling TypeFinder in

On Tuesday 04 August 2009 17:52, Chris Lattner wrote: > I'd prefer for it to be eliminated, but it is currently used widely. > If your patches don't make it substantially worse, I won't have a > problem with them. Bonus points for removing DOUTs though :) Ok, this is good to know. With some of these patches I will have opportunities to remove DOUTS. What's the

On Aug 4, 2009, at 4:03 PM, David Greene wrote: > On Tuesday 04 August 2009 17:52, Chris Lattner wrote: > >> I'd prefer for it to be eliminated, but it is currently used widely. >> If your patches don't make it substantially worse, I won't have a >> problem with them. Bonus points for removing DOUTs though :) > > Ok, this is good to know. With some of

I was looking over Function.cpp and saw that for every call to Intrinsic::getName, the entire intrinsic table (about a thousand references to strings) gets copied over for the initialization of Table. Is there a reason for why this is done, or would it be better for Table to be static, so that this initialization only happens on the first call? Perhaps this is optimized away for the release build,

Hello All, I am creating a Module and getting Function pointer as below in some function. Function *fn = module->getFunction(fnName); printf("func Name: %s.\n", fn->getName().str().c_str()); . . return (intptr_t) fn; This prints : "func Name: main." I convert the ptr to int and return it. Later I am receiving this as a Func Handler in other function