search for: getmodule

...printing I meant calling printf function and passing my global variable as one of the arguments. My code: Instruction* InstructionVisitor::incrementGlobalKey(Instruction* I) { IRBuilder<> Builder(I->getContext()); Builder.SetInsertPoint(I->getNextNode()); GlobalVariable* key = I->getModule()->getNamedGlobal("globalKey"); if (key) { LoadInst* load = Builder.CreateLoad(key); Value* inc = Builder.CreateAdd(load, Builder.getInt64(1)); StoreInst* store = Builder.CreateStore(inc, key); return store; } return I; } Instruction* InstructionVisitor::print(Instruction* I, const c...

...FILE *getFILE(void *Ptr) { static Module *LastMod = 0; static PointerTy IOBBase = 0; static unsigned FILESize; if (LastMod != &TheInterpreter->getModule()) { // Module change or initialize? Module *M = LastMod = &TheInterpreter->getModule(); // Check to see if the currently loaded module contain...

...6.0-x86_64-apple-darwin/include/llvm/IR/ >> BasicBlock.h >> >> is slightly different from that of the source >> >> llvm/include/llvm/IR/BasicBlock.h >> > > Where specifically did you download the source from? > > >> In particular, llvm:: getModule(..) is included in the latter >> BasicBlock.h but not in the former BasicBlock.h. Am I misunderstanding >> something or is it an inconsistency LLVM developers will fix? >> >> Thanks in advance. >> >> >> Zhoulai >> >> >> __________________...

...th no modules: jitstate will be 0 and therefore we have a null-pointer exception. The function returns a boolean for success/failure, however, so you would expect to be able to call it and get false back. Should we be checking for jitstate != 0 before accessing the variable? - if (jitstate->getModule() == M) { + if (jitstate && jitstate->getModule() == M) { Verena

...{ > static Module *LastMod = 0; > static PointerTy IOBBase = 0; > static unsigned FILESize; > > if (LastMod != &TheInterpreter->getModule()) { // Module change or initialize? > Module *M = LastMod = &TheInterpreter->getModule(); > > // Check to see if the currently loaded...

On 2008-05-13, at 02:12, Mahadevan R wrote: >>> That's not how the object works... > > Gordon, I think I can make it work if we have the following additional > function in LLVM-C: > > LLVMModuleRef LLVMGetModule(LLVMModuleProviderRef MP) { > return wrap(unwrap(MP)->getModule()); > } Can I ask, how general is your solution? I only intended to use this particular example as a proxy for the general problem of interaction between GC and manual memory management being complex. Will you require...

...nd binary from http://llvm.org/releases/download.html I just find the BasicBlock.h file of the binary package clang+llvm-3.6.0-x86_64-apple-darwin/include/llvm/IR/BasicBlock.h is slightly different from that of the source llvm/include/llvm/IR/BasicBlock.h In particular, llvm:: getModule(..) is included in the latter BasicBlock.h but not in the former BasicBlock.h. Am I misunderstanding something or is it an inconsistency LLVM developers will fix? Thanks in advance. Zhoulai -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org...

...)); for (Instruction &I : instructions(F)) { visitor.visit(I); } } return true;} Later in InstructionVisitor I try to update it like that: IRBuilder<> Builder(I->getContext());Builder.SetInsertPoint(I->getNextNode()); GlobalVariable* key = I->getModule()->getNamedGlobal("globalKey"); if (key) { LoadInst* load = Builder.CreateLoad(key); Value* inc = Builder.CreateAdd(load, Builder.getInt64(1)); StoreInst* store = Builder.CreateStore(inc, key);} I print that global variable during execution of instrumented code. I access i...

...n at mac.com> wrote: > On 2008-05-13, at 02:12, Mahadevan R wrote: > > >>> That's not how the object works... > > > > Gordon, I think I can make it work if we have the following additional > > function in LLVM-C: > > > > LLVMModuleRef LLVMGetModule(LLVMModuleProviderRef MP) { > > return wrap(unwrap(MP)->getModule()); > > } > > Can I ask, how general is your solution? I only intended to use this > particular example as a proxy for the general problem of interaction > between GC and manual memory management bein...

...ule *LastMod = 0; > > static PointerTy IOBBase = 0; > > static unsigned FILESize; > > > > if (LastMod != &TheInterpreter->getModule()) { // Module change or initialize? > > Module *M = LastMod = &TheInterpreter->getModule(); > > > > // Check to see if the c...

Hello, I want to add a global variable of arrayType in my MachineFunctionPass. However, I only get const Module from MachineFunction.getMMI().getModule(). I can't add any global variable to a const Module. Another way is to add a global variable in doInitialization in my MachineFunctionPass, but I can't determine the size of my arrayType for global variable in doInitialization. Is there any suggestion that can help me achieve this? Than...

Hi Lang, On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 20:47, Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com> wrote: > > Sorry for the delayed reply. Looks like you have figured out how to solve your issue already. Out of interest, what did you need to do? Do you have anything that you would like to see added to http://llvm.org/docs/ORCv2.html ? > Sorry my post was misleading. I figured out below which was part of the

...p() ; Function Attrs: ssp uwtable define i32 @_Z1fv() #2 { entry: %call = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* getelementptr inbounds ([21 x i8]* @.str1, i32 0, i32 0)) ret i32 0 } (gdb) n 513 } (gdb) br llvm::AssemblyWriter::printModule(llvm::Module const*) (gdb) p m_CurTransaction->getModule()->dump() llvm::AssemblyWriter::printGlobal (this=0x7fff5fbfe850, GV=0x107274058) at /Users/vvassilev/workspace/root/interpreter/llvm/src/lib/IR/AsmWriter.cpp:1444 1444 if (GV->isMaterializable()) (gdb) p GV->use_empty() $78 = false (gdb) p GV->use_back() $79 = (class llvm::User...

...r, llvm::orc::ConcurrentIRCompiler(std::move(*JTMB))); llvm::orc::MangleAndInterner Mangle(ES, *DL); ES.getMainJITDylib().setGenerator( llvm::cantFail(llvm::orc::DynamicLibrarySearchGenerator::GetForCurrentProcess(*DL))); // ... large part to generate IR code . if (llvm::verifyModule(*AST::getModule(), &llvm::errs())) { return 0; } else { std::cout << "Verified success\n"; } // run the generated IR code llvm::cantFail(CompileLayer.add(ES.getMainJITDylib(), llvm::orc::ThreadSafeModule(std::move(AST::takeModule()), AST::takeContext()))); auto symbol = ll...

...with: auto f = module->getOrInsertFunction( "eval_expr", ...) //create function Then later I link this with other modules: Linker link; link.LinkInModule( base_module ); link.LinkInModule( module ); Then I create an execution engine something like: auto ee = EngineBuilder( link.getModule() )...create(); If I attempt to run the function directly I get an error: ee->runFunction( f, args ); "LLVM ERROR: Program used external function 'eval_expr' which could not be resolved!" But if I get the same function from the linked module it works: ee->runFunction( li...

Hi, I am using LLVM 3.1, and wants to print the machine code of JIT IR I try the following method EngineBuilder builder(&ctx.getModule()); builder.setEngineKind(EngineKind::JIT); * TargetMachine * tm = builder.selectTarget(); tm->Options.PrintMachineCode = true;* engine = builder.create(); and somewhere in my code, I use runJITonFunction(); Another question is that I am not sure when JIT would dump machine code....

...ion. Can anyone tell me if I am wrong: ExecutionEngine: Module &CurMod; const TargetData *TD; JIT: TargetMachine &TM; TargetJITInfo &TJI; MachineCodeEmitter *MCE; I specifically did not protect the ExecutionEngine::CurMod member because a reference is returned via ExecutionEngine::getModule(). If access to it must be serialized, it must be done very carefully. I tried to make getModule return a constant reference, but that quickly led me into deep trouble in the world of const correctness. I've attached my patch against the latest CVS. There is one "trivial" fix whi...

On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Gordon Henriksen <gordonhenriksen at mac.com> wrote: > On May 12, 2008, at 12:00, Mahadevan R wrote: > > > 1) The MP dtor does a no-op (deletes self, but not the module it owns) > > That's not how the object works... Yes, I know ;-) I was hoping you could add a detach() or some such API for the MP...

> > That's not how the object works... Gordon, I think I can make it work if we have the following additional function in LLVM-C: LLVMModuleRef LLVMGetModule(LLVMModuleProviderRef MP) { return wrap(unwrap(MP)->getModule()); } Do you think you could add that? Can I send you a patch? Thanks & Regards, -Mahadevan.

...dev at cs.uiuc.edu > > Subject: [LLVMdev] Can I add GlobalVariable in MachineFunctionPass ? > > > > Hello, > > > > I want to add a global variable of arrayType in my MachineFunctionPass. > > However, I only get const Module from > > MachineFunction.getMMI().getModule(). > > I can't add any global variable to a const Module. > > Another way is to add a global variable in doInitialization in my > > MachineFunctionPass, but I can't determine the size of my arrayType for > > global variable in doInitialization. > > > > Is...