search for: getloadextact

...there any general objections to replace EVT with MVT in these cases? For example, a quick look at TargetLowering.h give me this list of (member) functions, taking an EVT parameter, that asserts if the argument is not an MVT: getRegClassFor, getRepRegClassFor, getRepRegClassCostFor, setTypeAction, getLoadExtAction, isLoadExtLegal, getTruncStoreAction, isTruncStoreLegal, getIndexedLoadAction, getIndexedStoreAction, getCondCodeAction, getTypeToPromoteTo, addRegisterClass Regards, Patrik Hägglund -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/piperm...

....h | 4 ++-- lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) commit 968d4fc892e13c7a4b37f3e083a91fbf457be746 Author: Patrik Hägglund <patrik.h.hagglund at ericsson.com> Date: Tue Dec 4 16:06:57 2012 +0100 Change TargetLowering::getLoadExtAction to take and MVT, instead of EVT. include/llvm/Target/TargetLowering.h | 10 +++++----- lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp | 2 +- lib/Transforms/Scalar/CodeGenPrepare.cpp | 2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) commit 1a8efcc09d412fd08766044489216391cfdd3afb Autho...

...ctions to replace EVT with MVT in these cases? > > For example, a quick look at TargetLowering.h give me this list of (member) functions, taking an EVT parameter, that asserts if the argument is not an MVT: > > getRegClassFor, getRepRegClassFor, getRepRegClassCostFor, setTypeAction, getLoadExtAction, isLoadExtLegal, getTruncStoreAction, isTruncStoreLegal, getIndexedLoadAction, getIndexedStoreAction, getCondCodeAction, getTypeToPromoteTo, addRegisterClass > Please do. MVT is cheaper than EVT and conceptually cleaner when dealing with physical machine types. EVT should only be used in...