search for: getint16ti

Hi, Nick, thanks for the reply. I still have a problem: I only need to "clone" an Instruction, changing its type. That is, I would like to keep all characteristics of the old Instruction and create a new one only with a different type. I am trying create a new Instruction thus: %3 = add nsw i32 %1, %2 ; <i16> [#uses=2] //Old Instruction Value* Op0 = I->getOperand(0); Value*

On 01/24/2011 04:41 AM, Douglas do Couto Teixeira wrote: > Hi, > > Nick, thanks for the reply. > I still have a problem: I only need to "clone" an Instruction, changing > its type. That is, I would like to keep all characteristics of the old > Instruction and create a new one only with a different type. Sure, but what about its operands? An "add" instruction

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote: > On 01/24/2011 04:41 AM, Douglas do Couto Teixeira wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Nick, thanks for the reply. >> I still have a problem: I only need to "clone" an Instruction, changing >> its type. That is, I would like to keep all characteristics of the old >> Instruction

On 1/24/11 12:05 PM, Douglas do Couto Teixeira wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca > <mailto:nicholas at mxc.ca>> wrote: > > On 01/24/2011 04:41 AM, Douglas do Couto Teixeira wrote: > > Hi, > > Nick, thanks for the reply. > I still have a problem: I only need to "clone" an

Hi, guys, Thanks a lot for your help. As you know, I am trying to implement something to change the types of the instructions. And I chose the trunc's approach because it seems be simple. But I still have some problems and questions. Would be great if you can help me. I have used the results of my range analysis implementation to change the intermediate representation. I am using

Hi All, I'm writing a code generation with my compiler. I read sever example and documentation but I did understand what I make wrong. What I try to do is a compare a local variable with a constant. But when I create a ICMP instruction I get that instruction are not of same type. I'm using llvm by svn repository updated at two week ago. The code that I try to generation is something

On 21 January 2011 12:56, Douglas do Couto Teixeira < douglasdocouto at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello guys, > > I wonder how I can change the type of an integer variable. For instance, > given the instruction "%3 = add i32 %1, %2" I would like to alter the > instruction to "%3 = add i16 %1, %2". Is there any way to do this? > No. Instead you create a new

Hello guys, I wonder how I can change the type of an integer variable. For instance, given the instruction "%3 = add i32 %1, %2" I would like to alter the instruction to "%3 = add i16 %1, %2". Is there any way to do this? Best wishes, Douglas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi Justin, my class is a visitor pattern and I use accept method to go recursive in suboject in my AST. In locals I store AllocaInst pointer. void *visit(var1_init_decl_c *symbol) { llvm::Type *lType; varNames.clear(); varType = ""; symbol->var1_list->accept(*this); /* get a vector contains variable names */ symbol->spec_init->accept(*this); /* Store in

you're not showing enough code. What does accept() do? Based on your description, I strongly suspect that your alloca and constant are not the same type. Remember that alloca returns a pointer type that you must load to get at the actual variable. On Jan 11, 2013 3:28 AM, "Manuele Conti" <manuele.conti at sirius-es.it> wrote: > Hi All, > I'm writing a code

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Manuele Conti <manuele.conti at sirius-es.it>wrote: > Hi Justin, > my class is a visitor pattern and I use accept method to go recursive in > suboject in my AST. > In locals I store AllocaInst pointer. > > > void *visit(var1_init_decl_c *symbol) { > llvm::Type *lType; > > varNames.clear(); > varType = "";