search for: getindexedstoreact

...at TargetLowering.h give me this list of (member) functions, taking an EVT parameter, that asserts if the argument is not an MVT: getRegClassFor, getRepRegClassFor, getRepRegClassCostFor, setTypeAction, getLoadExtAction, isLoadExtLegal, getTruncStoreAction, isTruncStoreLegal, getIndexedLoadAction, getIndexedStoreAction, getCondCodeAction, getTypeToPromoteTo, addRegisterClass Regards, Patrik Hägglund -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121203/d72ae610/attachment.html>

...wering.h give me this list of (member) functions, taking an EVT parameter, that asserts if the argument is not an MVT: > > getRegClassFor, getRepRegClassFor, getRepRegClassCostFor, setTypeAction, getLoadExtAction, isLoadExtLegal, getTruncStoreAction, isTruncStoreLegal, getIndexedLoadAction, getIndexedStoreAction, getCondCodeAction, getTypeToPromoteTo, addRegisterClass > Please do. MVT is cheaper than EVT and conceptually cleaner when dealing with physical machine types. EVT should only be used in parts of the code generator that are "pre-legalization" because they can represent arbitra...

....h | 2 +- 6 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) commit bd7d8621c38ddca079b8820dd532fd5b616f25da Author: Patrik Hägglund <patrik.h.hagglund at ericsson.com> Date: Tue Dec 4 11:02:16 2012 +0100 Change TargetLowering::getRepRegClassCostFor, getIndexedLoadAction, getIndexedStoreAction, and addRegisterClass to take and MVT, instead of EVT. include/llvm/Target/TargetLowering.h | 33 +++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) commit 1c1a80ce4db07988a839af7aa7a58acd6164364f Author: Patrik Hägglund <patrik.h.hagglund at ericsson.com...