search for: gethered

Hello, I have a question that I was wondering if anyone had a fairly straightforward answer to: what is the quickest and easiest way to take advantage of the extra cores / processors that are now commonplace on modern machines? And how do I do that in Windows? I realise that this is a complex question that is not answered easily, so let me refine it some more. The type of scripts that I'm

On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Anton Yartsev <anton.yartsev at gmail.com> wrote: > Ping! > > Suggested is a wrapper over a raw pointer that is intended for freeing > wrapped memory at the end of wrappers lifetime if ownership of a raw > pointer was not taken away during the lifetime of the wrapper. > The main difference from unique_ptr is an ability to access the wrapped

Thanks for the feedback! > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:36 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com > <mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com>> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Anton Yartsev > <anton.yartsev at gmail.com <mailto:anton.yartsev at gmail.com>> wrote: > > Ping! > > Suggested is a wrapper over a raw pointer

[+cfe-dev] This conversation has already been happening on llvm-dev so there's no good way for me to capture the entire existing discussion (so I'm jumping you in part-way) & the subject line could be more descriptive, but I wanted to add Clang developers since many of the interesting cases of conditional ownership I've seen were in Clang. I know some of you are also on llvm-dev

Ping - we've hit another of these (propagating Diagnostic::OwnsDiagClient into other places) in http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=221884 Any ideas how we should be tackling this overall? I'm not entirely convinced these are fixable by design and I think we might honestly want a conditional-ownership smart pointer... But I'm happy to hold off on that a

Dear list, I've been learning how to make a 2x2 paneled dotplot in lattice without any previous experience using lattice. my code thusfar is: nut<-read.table("/Users/colinwahl/Desktop/nutsimp_noerror.csv", T, sep= ",") attach(nut) nut1<-data.frame(Nitrate, Total_Nitrogen, Phosphate, Total_Phosphorus) nut1<-as.matrix(nut1) rownames(nut1)<-group

Hi I have a customer running 2 RedHat 7.3 servers. These are running to gether with w2k and w2k3 machines in an Active Directory. I ran samba 2.0.7 and upgraded to 3.0.8 because of that the customer had to use restrict anonymous = 2 in windows, that stops the IPC$ share to be seen by anonymous connections. I configured Kerberos and could connect windows boxes to one of the linux boxes, the

Hello All, can anybody tell me how can i integrate asterisk and skype users so that skype users can dial my asterisk number or dial internal dialplan form skype regars Dhaval -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090708/cccd4587/attachment.htm

...dows then runs on it''s own VGA-Driver (the graphic card is currectly identified and this is an actual ati driver, so I''m not talking about some generic standard vga driver. I don''t know where is driver is coming from). I''ve attached an analysis file i''ve gethered from the bluescreen crash dump. I created it using BluescreenView. This is more for currectly identifieng the different BSODs, I guess. Some Infos: Kernel: 3.7.4 kernel.org kernel without patches Xen: latest xen-unstable (but also tested with xen-4.2-testing) Processor: AMD Phenom 1090T Mainboard...

Here is an example that seems perfect for Ajax that I have not seen implemented nor can figure out how to do it. I am hoping someone can give me some pointers. On the sign-up page, I would like to do my validations (password length, username uniqueness,etc ) Ajax-style. But if all validates, then redirect to the success page. The combining of redirection to a new page with Ajax is throwing me.

On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Aaron Gray < aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com> wrote: > I like the idea of a generic MachineCodeWriter, although I prefer the >> name 'ObjectFileWriter'... >> > > Thats much more descriptive of the functionality. > Sorry, I disagree actually the MachineCodeEmitter or the 'MachineCodeWritter' does not do any file

On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com > wrote: > On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Aaron Gray < > aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com> wrote: > >> I like the idea of a generic MachineCodeWriter, although I prefer the >>> name 'ObjectFileWriter'... >>> >> >> Thats much more descriptive of

On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Argyrios Kyrtzidis <akyrtzi at gmail.com> wrote: > Could we consider moving the things you listed to shared pointer semantics > ? It will be a simple and clear model; unless someone justifies that it > will be a performance concern to use shared pointers there I don’t think we > need a new and more complex to reason about smart pointer. >

>I like the idea of a generic MachineCodeWriter, although I prefer the >name 'ObjectFileWriter'... Thats much more descriptive of the functionality. >I think we need to take a hard look at which bits of the >Writer/Emitter infrastructure are needed for what tasks (Object File >Emittion, JIT, etc.) and make sure that our abstractions are flexible >enough... I would

Hello For customers who need a small IP PBX to handle up to four ISDN lines (in France, so I guess that means EuroISDN) instead of a PC + Asterisk and an ISDN gateway box, has someone already played with the Atcom IP-4B? www.atcom.cn/IP-BRIM.html Any feedback appreciated.

Hi, Is there a security problem with ssh that I've missed??? Ik keep getting these hords of: Failed password for root from 69.242.5.195 port 39239 ssh2 with all kinds of different source addresses. They have a shot or 15 and then they are of again, but a little later on they're back and keep clogging my logs. Is there a "easy" way of getting these ip-numbers added to

-----Mensaje original----- De: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com]En nombre de asterisk-users-request@lists.digium.com Enviado el: jueves, 02 de febrero de 2006 10:15 Para: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Asunto: Asterisk-Users Digest, Vol 19, Issue 15 Send Asterisk-Users mailing list submissions to asterisk-users@lists.digium.com To