search for: getfunctions

Pinging again, more loudly :-) Michael Muller wrote: > > Ping. (looking for someone to review or commit this, thanks) > > Michael Muller wrote: > > > > Thanks, Duncan - > > > > > Hi Michael, > > > > > > > --- lib/ExecutionEngine/JIT/JITEmitter.cpp (revision 163478) > > > > +++ lib/ExecutionEngine/JIT/JITEmitter.cpp

So, I won't know the called function statically, Right? -------------------------------------------- Qiuping Yi Institute Of Software Chinese Academy of Sciences On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Nema, Ashutosh <Ashutosh.Nema at amd.com> wrote: > Typically for C++ virtual function you will see an indirect callSite > (unless not de-virtualized). > > > > Regards, >

Dear Ashutosh, Thank you, I can handle some indirect callSites by getFunction() of InvokInst and CallInst. However, when I am handling C++ programs, I found the calls of member functions are converted to some strange indirect calls. For example: table->truncate(sysTransaction); // from mysql are translated to the next complex llvm IR: _ZN8Database20getSystemTransactionEv.exit: ;

Hi all, I want to find all the called functions in each function, thus I iterate the calledFunctions of each CallGraphNode in CallGraph as follow: for (CallGraph::iterator it = CG->begin(); it != CG->end(); ++it) { CallGraphNode* node = it->second; for (CallGraphNode::iterator it2 = node->begin(); it2 != node->end(); ++it2) { Function* calledFunc =

Hi, I'd like to get the Function* that is described by a DISubprogram. I found this method getFunction() in the class. However, when I use it in my code, the function always returns 0. I tried to dig into it and saw that a mysterious number 16 is used in getFunctionField(16). I'm wondering if my failure of the function was caused by my incorrect use, e.g., without fulfilling

Hi Joshua, I have a function foo and I want to insert exit(0) at the end of foo. The problem is M.getFunction returns null, which is understandable. I am not sure what to do. Below is the code snippet. void foo(int argc, char* argv[]) { printf("hello world\n"); exit(0); //***I want to insert this exit } My llvm code snippet is vector<const Type *> params =

Hello, I want to traverse CallGraph code segment: virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { AU.addRequired<CallGraph>(); } virtual bool runOnModule(Module &F) { CallGraph &g = getAnalysis<CallGraph>(); for ( CallGraph::iterator i = g.begin(); i != g.end(); i++) { errs()<<"-----------------\n";

Hey, I am trying to use the BlockFrequencyInfoWrapperPass to obtain hotness information in my LLVM pass. Attached is a minimal example of code which creates a SIGSEGV. The pass calls AU.addRequired<BlockFrequencyInfoWrapperPass>(); in getAnalysisUsage(..). The problem exists with changed and unchanged IR. The binary is instrumented like this: clang input.bc -fprofile-generate -o

On Sep 19, 2007, at 4:48 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: > Hi all, > > This program: > > @protocol CPTransferThreadObserving; > > @interface CPMode {} > @end > > @implementation CPMode > -(void) copyInBackgroundAndNotifyUsingPorts { > id client; > [client setProtocolForProxy: > @protocol(CPTransferThreadObserving)]; > } > @end > >

Hi, I was looking at how to use debug info to find out original source:line for a certain function/variable in the llvm bytecode. I read http://llvm.org/docs/SourceLevelDebugging.html, and then I have looked in lib/Debugger/ProgramInfo.cpp. getFunction() looks useful, however I am not sure how to call it. I have a reference to a Function, however getFunction() takes a GlobalVariable. I tried

Hi! I am trying to develop an LLVM tool which can apply different optimizations for selected functions. For example, I want to apply an optimization onto one function but not for another one. I am using the standard optimizations available in LLVM. That is the runOnModule function I have written: bool ComplNewBBFuncs::runOnModule(Module &M) { Function *Main =

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Jianfei Hu <hujianfei258 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > I want to traverse CallGraph > > code segment: > > > virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const > { > AU.addRequired<CallGraph>(); > } > > virtual

Hi all, This program: @protocol CPTransferThreadObserving; @interface CPMode {} @end @implementation CPMode -(void) copyInBackgroundAndNotifyUsingPorts { id client; [client setProtocolForProxy: @protocol(CPTransferThreadObserving)]; } @end produces this internal compiler error: $ llvm-gcc -x objective-c -arch ppc64 -std=c99 -c testcase.mi testcase.mi:12: internal compiler

Hi, I am trying to replace a c-style function with another function with same signature. Consider the following code: std::stringstream main_c; main_c <<"#include <stdio.h>\n" <<"extern \"C\" { \n" <<"int print1()\n" <<"{\n" <<" printf(\"Inside

This should have gotten an assertion failure in a compiler built with assertions, surely... On Sep 19, 2007, at 5:41 PM, Devang Patel wrote: >> $ llvm-gcc -x objective-c -arch ppc64 -std=c99 -c testcase.mi >> testcase.mi:12: internal compiler error: Bus error >> Please submit a full bug report, >> with preprocessed source if appropriate. >> See

Hi Everyone, I am trying to insert an exit function into my IR. However, I thought I can get access to exit by using Module.getOrInsertFunction or Module.getFunction. However, I am getting a null value returned. I have searched through the llvmdev archives but not found any thing that addresses this question. Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks. George -------------- next part

Hi all, I''ve got a preliminary JRuby version of win32-api checked into CVS at the moment under win32-api/lib/win32/api.rb. I''ve also pasted it below. It doesn''t quite work right in that I can''t get it to modify the arguments in place in the API#call method. Take a look at the sample code at the very bottom to see what I mean. I haven''t even tried

Hi everyone, vmkit requires to know the size of a jitted method before emitting the method. This allows to allocate the correct size for the method. The attached patch creates this functionality when the flag SizedMemoryCode is on. In order to implement this functionality, i had to virtualize some MachineCodeEmitter functions. Is it OK to commit the patch? Thanks, Nicolas --------------

On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:31 PM, George Baah <georgebaah at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Joshua, >       I have a function foo and I want to insert exit(0) at the end of foo. > The problem is M.getFunction returns null, which is understandable. I am not > sure what to do. Below is the code snippet. > void foo(int argc, char* argv[]) { >   printf("hello world\n"); >

Hello, I want to access the instructions via: CallGraph->CallGraphNode->Function->BB->Instruction Is this possible? Right now, I'm iterating over the CallGraph Nodes via CallGraphSCC:iterator, but then I have to cast that iterator to a CallGraphNode const and then when I call CallGraphNode->getFunction, it returns a valid function but seg faults on function->getName()?