Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "getdn".
Did you mean:
getdr
2018 Jan 11
3
sshfp/ldns still having issues in 7.6
> I replaced the ldns code with getdns. Works fine for more than a year now.
>
I am interested in how you did that. Would you mind sharing your procedure?
> I don't think anybody cares. I tried to tell people. But that had no
> effect.
>
There certainly is not as much talk about it as I would expect there to be.
2007 Jul 31
0
wsdlDriver won't run under Rails (SSL)
...ssl.crt/server_cert.crt''
soap.options[''protocol.http.ssl_config.client_key'']=''/etc/certs/ssl.crt/server_key_nopass.pem''
soap.options[''protocol.http.ssl_config.ca_file'']=''/etc/certs/ssl.crt/ca.crt''
dn = soap.getDn(user)
puts dn
=======================================
||Behind a Controller: (Doesn''t work) ||
=======================================
require ''soap/wsdlDriver''
require ''http-access2''
class WebserviceTestController < ApplicationController...
2018 Jan 10
4
sshfp/ldns still having issues in 7.6
I have been running openSSH 7.4p1 for a while now. When I upgraded to 7.5 a
year or so ago I ran into the problem listed in this bug report:
Bug report: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218472
The release notes for 7.6 release notes indicate that the fix patch was
included: https://www.openssh.com/txt/release-7.6
I tried 7.6 and I still cannot connect without a prompt wondering
2015 May 25
4
Name based SSH proxy
On 25/05/15 09.51, Damien Miller wrote:
> I'm not sure it should be part of the banner exchange, though there is
> no other trivial way to do it and maintain backwards compatibility.
Even if backwards compatibility wasn't a requirement,
I don't see any better way it could be done.
> I don't much like it because it reveals host identity information
> in the clear.
So
2015 May 26
6
Name based SSH proxy
...ee options
for when to send the hostname? The three options I would
have in mind are: always, only on IPv4, and never.
>
> In practice, there is work done today to protect DNS queries as well
> (see the DNS Privacy working group in the IETF, the latest versions of
> libunbound and the getdns API, etc).
I haven't seen any of the work done in those areas. But
considering how little traction DNSSEC has, I would
imagine that DNS privacy initiatives would take decades
to get any traction.
If you have any pointers, I am very curious as to exactly
how they intend to do get any privacy...