search for: getdesign

On 02.01.2013, at 20:37, Alon Zakai wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Sebastian Redl" <sebastian.redl at getdesigned.at> >> >> It would be awesome to combine the llvm.org demo with the in-browser >> emscripten (or possibly a server-side emscripten) so that the user >> can execute his snippets in the browser. >> >> This would be especially awesome for a C++ tutorial page....

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sebastian Redl" <sebastian.redl at getdesigned.at> > To: "Eli Bendersky" <eliben at google.com> > Cc: "Alon Zakai" <azakai at mozilla.com>, "llvmdev" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Wednesday, January 2, 2013 11:24:33 AM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM IR execution in JavaScript &g...

On 02.01.2013, at 19:51, Eli Bendersky wrote: >> I compiled parts of LLVM to JavaScript using emscripten and made a demo of parsing and executing LLVM assembly, >> >> http://kripken.github.com/llvm.js/demo.html >> >> Basically you enter some LLVM IR, press a button and see the output of compiling and running it, directly in the browser. >> >> This was

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sebastian Redl" <sebastian.redl at getdesigned.at> > To: "Alon Zakai" <azakai at mozilla.com> > Cc: "llvmdev" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>, "Eli Bendersky" <eliben at google.com> > Sent: Wednesday, January 2, 2013 11:44:27 AM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM IR execution in JavaScript &g...

my 2 cents but it looks like the logo was drawn using a vector graphics editor, so you may directly ask the author the .svg version ;-) - Christophe On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Sebastian Redl<sebastian.redl at getdesigned.at> wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:09:01 -0700, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> > wrote: >> http://llvm.org/Logo.html >> >> That said, I'm not a graphic artist.  I simply down-sampled the image >> to get the "Small" one that I'd...

Yes, this is controlled by the -frandom-seed flag. Sadly, it is expected behavior. -Chris On Nov 12, 2010, at 7:10 AM, Sebastian Redl <sebastian.redl at getdesigned.at> wrote: > On 12.11.2010 15:26, Erik Cederstrand wrote: >> I have noticed that two consecutive builds of clang, clang++ and tblgen don't produce identical binaries (as in md5 sums) on identical source code (I'm on FreeBSD). I ran strings(1) on the two clang binaries, and I...

...#39;s also a missed opportunity for optimizations -- if optimizer knew where outside-of-the-struct pointer is really going it could make direct call instead of indirect -- however, I don't know if this is a big deal. Eugene On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Sebastian Redl <sebastian.redl at getdesigned.at> wrote: > > On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 11:42:41 +0100, David Terei <davidterei at gmail.com> > wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> The GHC developers would like to add support to llvm to enable the >> order that code and data are laid out in, in the resulting assembly &gt...

...n a function and refer to them as a global would be useful for all manner of side-tables. Being able to just order output of globals and functions make picking sections for them fairly hackish. Andrew > Eugene > > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Sebastian Redl > <sebastian.redl at getdesigned.at> wrote: >> >> On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 11:42:41 +0100, David Terei <davidterei at gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> The GHC developers would like to add support to llvm to enable the >>> order that code and data are laid out in, i...

...would be useful for all manner of side-tables. > Being able to just order output of globals and functions make picking > sections for them fairly hackish. > > Andrew > > >> Eugene >> >> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Sebastian Redl >> <sebastian.redl at getdesigned.at> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 11:42:41 +0100, David Terei <davidterei at gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> The GHC developers would like to add support to llvm to enable the >>>> order that code...

...sing a vector > graphics editor, so you may directly ask the author the .svg version > ;-) I'll definitely try, but no promises. I don't know if they kept it (!). -Chris > > > - Christophe > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Sebastian > Redl<sebastian.redl at getdesigned.at> wrote: >> >> On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:09:01 -0700, Chris Lattner >> <clattner at apple.com> >> wrote: >>> http://llvm.org/Logo.html >>> >>> That said, I'm not a graphic artist. I simply down-sampled the >>> image >...

OvermindDL1 wrote: > Again, why not Spirit2.1, works just fine on C++98, and it is fast, > and it is split up into the smallest bits so you only include what you > use, and the assembly it compiles into is *very* tiny, far far less > then any regex library could possibly be. > Spirit is not an option for one simple reason: FileCheck needs to parse regexes from its instruction

Bah, the mailing server still has the headers broken! Sending to the list this time, how inconvenient... On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 3:18 AM, Sebastian Redl<sebastian.redl at getdesigned.at> wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:25:30 +0200, HyperQuantum <hyperquantum at gmail.com> > wrote: >>>> +//===-- Regex.h - Regular Expression matcher implementation >>>> -------------===// >>> >>> Include C++ marker please (*- C++ -*-=...

On 12.11.2010 15:26, Erik Cederstrand wrote: > I have noticed that two consecutive builds of clang, clang++ and tblgen don't produce identical binaries (as in md5 sums) on identical source code (I'm on FreeBSD). I ran strings(1) on the two clang binaries, and I get the following: > 251862c251862 > <

...builds by passing -frandom-seed=0 to clang and/or gcc. -Chris On Nov 12, 2010, at 9:19 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > Yes, this is controlled by the -frandom-seed flag. Sadly, it is expected behavior. > > -Chris > > On Nov 12, 2010, at 7:10 AM, Sebastian Redl <sebastian.redl at getdesigned.at> wrote: > >> On 12.11.2010 15:26, Erik Cederstrand wrote: >>> I have noticed that two consecutive builds of clang, clang++ and tblgen don't produce identical binaries (as in md5 sums) on identical source code (I'm on FreeBSD). I ran strings(1) on the two clang bin...

On 02.01.2013, at 20:50, Alon Zakai wrote: > I agree both are useful approaches. I went with clientside-everything in this demo because I work on that stuff and like it ;) Oh, I agree that it is awesome. It just froze my browser completely for several seconds just compiling the Hello World program. Sebastian

On 11.01.2013, at 20:08, Eli Bendersky wrote: >>> I suppose this tradeoff can be evaluated by looking at the delta >>> between 4.5 and 4.6 which is actually supported by MSVC 2010 and Clang >>> 3.1 >> >> Makes perfect sense to me. >> >> -Chris > > According to http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html, these features > are available from

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:30 PM, David Majnemer <david.majnemer at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com> > wrote: >> >> Currently, LLVM_HAS_INITIALIZER_LISTS is set based on >> >> __has_feature(cxx_generalized_initializers) && !defined(_MSC_VER) >> >> Based on the

>> I suppose this tradeoff can be evaluated by looking at the delta >> between 4.5 and 4.6 which is actually supported by MSVC 2010 and Clang >> 3.1 > > Makes perfect sense to me. > > -Chris According to http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html, these features are available from 4.6 (language features only): - Null pointer constant - Forward declarations for enums -

On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:09:01 -0700, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > http://llvm.org/Logo.html > > That said, I'm not a graphic artist. I simply down-sampled the image > to get the "Small" one that I'd like to use on the sidebar. The image > is complex enough that it will probably take someone who knows what > they are doing to make

Hello LLVM'ers I have noticed that two consecutive builds of clang, clang++ and tblgen don't produce identical binaries (as in md5 sums) on identical source code (I'm on FreeBSD). I ran strings(1) on the two clang binaries, and I get the following: 248400,248403c248400,248403 <