Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "getdescend".
Did you mean:
getdescent
2005 Nov 24
1
Extended $ function called $$
...ually broke all my own code. I used a format that was a
little tighter but a lot less standard CSS. This format as shown adheres
pretty closely to the standard used in most browsers.
Here is the code:
// equivalent to getElementsByTagName("*") but should work for all
browsers.
Element.getDescendants = function(el){
// browser searching ugliness necessary. msie supports
getElementsByTagName
// but fails when passing in "*" for some versions. Safari fails too.
// Because of this, we need to walk DOM for failures.
// for now, I''ve set it to false but the bracketed p...
2015 Sep 21
4
When can the dominator tree not contain a node for a basic block?
When looking into https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24866, I
discovered that the root cause of the crash is that I was expecting
every basic block to have a corresponding Node in the dominator tree.
Apparently, the "while.end" basic block in the example does not have a
Node in the Dominator Tree. Can anyone tell me if this is expected?
If so, under what circumstances?
2017 Aug 26
2
building release_50 with gcc7.2.0 on MacOS: duplicate symbol llvm::DominatorTreeBase
...minators.cpp.o)
duplicate symbol llvm::DominatorTreeBase<llvm::BasicBlock,
true>::print(llvm::raw_ostream&) const in:
../../lib/libLLVMAnalysis.a(PostDominators.cpp.o)
../../lib/libLLVMCore.a(Dominators.cpp.o)
duplicate symbol llvm::DominatorTreeBase<llvm::BasicBlock,
true>::getDescendants(llvm::BasicBlock*,
llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::BasicBlock*>&) const in:
../../lib/libLLVMAnalysis.a(PostDominators.cpp.o)
../../lib/libLLVMCore.a(Dominators.cpp.o)
duplicate symbol llvm::DominatorTreeBase<llvm::BasicBlock,
true>::isReachableFromEntry(llvm::DomTreeNodeBas...