Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "getdebucloc".
2011 Nov 01
2
[LLVMdev] Adding a custom GC safe point creation phase
...F.end(); BBI != BBE; ++BBI) {
for (MachineBasicBlock::iterator MI = BBI->begin(),
ME = BBI->end(); MI != ME; ++MI) {
if (MI->getDesc().isCall()) {
/// Standard code need for adding a post call safe point;
} else if (MI->getDebucLoc().getCol() == 1) {
/// Standard code need for adding a post call safe point;
}
}
}
So it really looks like what we already have, except this special trick
about checking the debug location. Piggy backing on the debug location is
easy and works for me because:
1) Debug locatio...
2011 Nov 01
0
[LLVMdev] Adding a custom GC safe point creation phase
...I) {
> for (MachineBasicBlock::iterator MI = BBI->begin(),
> ME = BBI->end(); MI != ME; ++MI) {
> if (MI->getDesc().isCall()) {
> /// Standard code need for adding a post call safe point;
> } else if (MI->getDebucLoc().getCol() == 1) {
> /// Standard code need for adding a post call safe point;
> }
> }
> }
>
> So it really looks like what we already have, except this special trick about checking the debug location. Piggy backing on the debug location is easy and works fo...
2011 Nov 01
0
[LLVMdev] Adding a custom GC safe point creation phase
On 2011-10-31, at 17:21, Nicolas Geoffray wrote:
> Here's a patch to allow a GCStrategy to customize the places where it wants to insert safe points. I'm not sure who maintains the GC code today in LLVM (I'd be happy to take ownership, if needed).
>
> The patch just adds up a custom safepoints flag, similar to the way the GCStrategy can customize intrinsics lowering, or
2011 Oct 31
2
[LLVMdev] Adding a custom GC safe point creation phase
Hi Chris, Gordon,
Here's a patch to allow a GCStrategy to customize the places where it wants
to insert safe points. I'm not sure who maintains the GC code today in LLVM
(I'd be happy to take ownership, if needed).
The patch just adds up a custom safepoints flag, similar to the way the
GCStrategy can customize intrinsics lowering, or roots initialization. It
works pretty well, as