Displaying 20 results from an estimated 22 matches for "getcommandlin".
Did you mean:
getcommandline
2011 Sep 07
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Unicode path handling on Windows
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Nikola Smiljanic <popizdeh at gmail.com> wrote:
> The problem is not in the functions that return multibyte strings (the
> multibyte string is coming from argv)
argv is implicitly the return from a UTF16->multibyte conversion (i.e.
it's lossy).
-Eli
2011 Sep 07
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Unicode path handling on Windows
So what are you exactly saying? Somebody proposed using GetCommandLine
instead of using argv directly. And what about my other points about ::open
and ::stat?
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Nikola Smiljanic <popizdeh at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > The problem is...
2011 Sep 20
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Unicode path handling on Windows
...; instead or
ignore the allocation completely?
3. There is an #ifdef inside driver.cpp right now that I don't like.
get_utf8_argv works for windows only, but I could change the function to
accept argv and return it as vector of utf8 strings. It would convert char*
to std::string on unix and use GetCommandLine + utf8 conversion on windows.
4. Should I wrap functions like ::fstat and ::close for consistency even
though they don't work with paths?
I'll fix everything that is formatting related. You're right, current patch
has Open only for windows but I'll add the other one as well.
On T...
2011 Sep 20
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Unicode path handling on Windows
...cleanup within the call.
> 3. There is an #ifdef inside driver.cpp right now that I don't like.
> get_utf8_argv works for windows only, but I could change the function to
> accept argv and return it as vector of utf8 strings. It would convert char*
> to std::string on unix and use GetCommandLine + utf8 conversion on windows.
I have no concrete opinion one way or the other on this.
> 4. Should I wrap functions like ::fstat and ::close for consistency even
> though they don't work with paths?
I don't believe so.
> I'll fix everything that is formatting related. You&...
2011 Sep 20
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Unicode path handling on Windows
...has a number of issues but I'd like to
> hear from someone that this solution makes sense before I try to address
> them).
General nitpick: make sure you're using spaces instead of tabs, and
that your lines are less than 80 characters wide.
+ wchar_t** wargv = ::CommandLineToArgvW(::GetCommandLineW(), &argc);
You may want to test the consistency of this approach from the
original with regards to backslashes and quotation marks, if for no
other reason than documenting it. CommandLineToArgvW calls them out
in the documentation.
+ for (int i = 0; i != argc; ++i)
+ {
+ int len = ::WideC...
2011 Sep 07
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Unicode path handling on Windows
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Nikola Smiljanic <popizdeh at gmail.com> wrote:
> So what are you exactly saying? Somebody proposed using GetCommandLine
> instead of using argv directly. And what about my other points about ::open
> and ::stat?
Because of the way Windows works, the only fully correct solution is
to never touch the native charset, and keep everything in UTF-8/16 all
the time. Anything else is going to lead to bugs like &quo...
2011 Sep 23
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Unicode path handling on Windows
...;
> > 3. There is an #ifdef inside driver.cpp right now that I don't like.
> > get_utf8_argv works for windows only, but I could change the function to
> > accept argv and return it as vector of utf8 strings. It would convert
> char*
> > to std::string on unix and use GetCommandLine + utf8 conversion on
> windows.
>
> I have no concrete opinion one way or the other on this.
>
> > 4. Should I wrap functions like ::fstat and ::close for consistency even
> > though they don't work with paths?
>
> I don't believe so.
>
> > I'll f...
2011 Sep 27
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Unicode path handling on Windows
...>
> > 3. There is an #ifdef inside driver.cpp right now that I don't like.
> > get_utf8_argv works for windows only, but I could change the function to
> > accept argv and return it as vector of utf8 strings. It would convert char*
> > to std::string on unix and use GetCommandLine + utf8 conversion on windows.
>
> I have no concrete opinion one way or the other on this.
>
> > 4. Should I wrap functions like ::fstat and ::close for consistency even
> > though they don't work with paths?
>
> I don't believe so.
>
> > I'll fi...
2011 Sep 29
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Unicode path handling on Windows
...> 3. There is an #ifdef inside driver.cpp right now that I don't like.
>> > get_utf8_argv works for windows only, but I could change the function to
>> > accept argv and return it as vector of utf8 strings. It would convert char*
>> > to std::string on unix and use GetCommandLine + utf8 conversion on windows.
>>
>> I have no concrete opinion one way or the other on this.
>>
>> > 4. Should I wrap functions like ::fstat and ::close for consistency even
>> > though they don't work with paths?
>>
>> I don't believe so....
2011 Sep 29
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Unicode path handling on Windows
...here is an #ifdef inside driver.cpp right now that I don't like.
>> > get_utf8_argv works for windows only, but I could change the function to
>> > accept argv and return it as vector of utf8 strings. It would convert
>> char*
>> > to std::string on unix and use GetCommandLine + utf8 conversion on
>> windows.
>>
>> I have no concrete opinion one way or the other on this.
>>
>> > 4. Should I wrap functions like ::fstat and ::close for consistency even
>> > though they don't work with paths?
>>
>> I don't belie...
2011 Sep 30
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Unicode path handling on Windows
...e is an #ifdef inside driver.cpp right now that I don't like.
>>> > get_utf8_argv works for windows only, but I could change the function to
>>> > accept argv and return it as vector of utf8 strings. It would convert char*
>>> > to std::string on unix and use GetCommandLine + utf8 conversion on windows.
>>>
>>> I have no concrete opinion one way or the other on this.
>>>
>>> > 4. Should I wrap functions like ::fstat and ::close for consistency even
>>> > though they don't work with paths?
>>>
>>...
2011 Sep 30
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Unicode path handling on Windows
...er.cpp right now that I don't like.
>>> > get_utf8_argv works for windows only, but I could change the function
>>> to
>>> > accept argv and return it as vector of utf8 strings. It would convert
>>> char*
>>> > to std::string on unix and use GetCommandLine + utf8 conversion on
>>> windows.
>>>
>>> I have no concrete opinion one way or the other on this.
>>>
>>> > 4. Should I wrap functions like ::fstat and ::close for consistency
>>> even
>>> > though they don't work with paths...
2002 Apr 23
1
Can't load native dll
When I try to load winelib dll I get an error message:
"err:module:MODULE_LoadLibraryExA Loading of native
DLL <dllname> failed (error 193), check this file."
The error message is printed for call:
DllHandle = LoadLibrary(DllName);
This happens even when I try to load standard Wine
dlls, like dlls/msisys.ocx.so
Did I miss something obvious?
Thanks,
Andriy Palamarchuk
2011 Oct 03
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Unicode path handling on Windows
...t I don't like.
>>>> > get_utf8_argv works for windows only, but I could change the function
>>>> to
>>>> > accept argv and return it as vector of utf8 strings. It would convert
>>>> char*
>>>> > to std::string on unix and use GetCommandLine + utf8 conversion on
>>>> windows.
>>>>
>>>> I have no concrete opinion one way or the other on this.
>>>>
>>>> > 4. Should I wrap functions like ::fstat and ::close for consistency
>>>> even
>>>> > though th...
2011 Oct 03
5
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Unicode path handling on Windows
...ef inside driver.cpp right now that I don't like.
>>>> > get_utf8_argv works for windows only, but I could change the function to
>>>> > accept argv and return it as vector of utf8 strings. It would convert char*
>>>> > to std::string on unix and use GetCommandLine + utf8 conversion on windows.
>>>>
>>>> I have no concrete opinion one way or the other on this.
>>>>
>>>> > 4. Should I wrap functions like ::fstat and ::close for consistency even
>>>> > though they don't work with paths?
&g...
2011 Oct 03
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Unicode path handling on Windows
...>>>>> > get_utf8_argv works for windows only, but I could change the function
>>>>> to
>>>>> > accept argv and return it as vector of utf8 strings. It would convert
>>>>> char*
>>>>> > to std::string on unix and use GetCommandLine + utf8 conversion on
>>>>> windows.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have no concrete opinion one way or the other on this.
>>>>>
>>>>> > 4. Should I wrap functions like ::fstat and ::close for consistency
>>>>> even
>>...
2011 Sep 20
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Unicode path handling on Windows
...ution makes sense before I try to address
them).
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Nikola Smiljanic <popizdeh at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > So what are you exactly saying? Somebody proposed using GetCommandLine
> > instead of using argv directly. And what about my other points about
> ::open
> > and ::stat?
>
> Because of the way Windows works, the only fully correct solution is
> to never touch the native charset, and keep everything in UTF-8/16 all
> the time. Anything else...
2011 Sep 30
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Unicode path handling on Windows
...er.cpp right now that I don't like.
>>> > get_utf8_argv works for windows only, but I could change the function
>>> to
>>> > accept argv and return it as vector of utf8 strings. It would convert
>>> char*
>>> > to std::string on unix and use GetCommandLine + utf8 conversion on
>>> windows.
>>>
>>> I have no concrete opinion one way or the other on this.
>>>
>>> > 4. Should I wrap functions like ::fstat and ::close for consistency
>>> even
>>> > though they don't work with paths...
2023 Oct 30
2
system()/system2() using short paths of commands on Windows?
I have read about "system() not using a shell on Windows" on the help
page many times before but never understood what it means technically.
Please forgive my ignorance. I still do not understand it, but thanks
a lot for the explanation anyway! I'm just curious if the full path
would work in system() today. If it still would not work because
today's Windows is still like Windows
2011 Oct 03
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Unicode path handling on Windows
...iver.cpp right now that I don't like.
>>>>> > get_utf8_argv works for windows only, but I could change the function to
>>>>> > accept argv and return it as vector of utf8 strings. It would convert char*
>>>>> > to std::string on unix and use GetCommandLine + utf8 conversion on windows.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have no concrete opinion one way or the other on this.
>>>>>
>>>>> > 4. Should I wrap functions like ::fstat and ::close for consistency even
>>>>> > though they don't...