search for: getclangbuildfactory

...r (2 bots) - based on UnifiedTreeBuilder * LLDPerformanceTesuiteBuilder (1 bot) - based on UnifiedTreeBuilder Some build factories will be deprecated. If you use one of these, please change your bot to use something else instead. Here is the list of deprecated build factories: * ClangBuilder.getClangBuildFactory (0 bots) * LLDBuilder (0 bots) * ClangAndLLDBuilder (0 bots) However, some special build factories and build factories with a few bots would need your attention. Here is the list of build factories in need of porting. Patches are welcome. * LLVMBuilder (3 bots) * PollyBuilder (3 bots) *...

...ased on UnifiedTreeBuilder >> >> >> >> Some build factories will be deprecated. If you use one of these, please >> change your bot to use something else instead. Here is the list of >> deprecated build factories: >> >> >> >> * ClangBuilder.getClangBuildFactory (0 bots) >> >> * LLDBuilder (0 bots) >> >> * ClangAndLLDBuilder (0 bots) >> >> >> >> However, some special build factories and build factories with a few bots >> would need your attention. >> >> Here is the list of build factories in...

...ons to use one of the currently supported build factories, or port that factory to work with github and monorepo. > > * LLVMBuilder (3 bots) > * PollyBuilder (3 bots) > * LLDBBuilder (6 bots) > * SanitizerBuilder (10 bots) > * CUDATestsuiteBuilder (1 bot) - depends on ClangBuilder.getClangBuildFactory > * AOSPBuilder (1 bot) - depends on PollyBuilder > * AnnotatedBuilder (2 bots) > * OpenMPBuilder (2 bots) > * FuchsiaBuilder (1 bot) > > Thanks > > Galina > > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 12:05 AM Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote: >> >&g...

...>>> one of the .py files in zorg? >> >> Can you get the desired effect with --with-extra-options=? > > Probably, but where do I put that? It is a configure argument that specifies extra options to compile with. For buildbots, it is the extra_configure_args parameter for getClangBuildFactory (look at examples in builders.py). Dmitri -- main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if (j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com>*/

Hi Richard, Marco, I noticed that you two are the remaining bot owners using the `getClangBuildFactory` from `ClangBuilder`. All the other bots using that builder have moved to the new `getClangCMakeBuildFactory`, including Windows ones. Given that they do similar functionalities, I'd like to encourage you to move to the new factory, so that we can simplify the builder's code. Thanks! --re...

Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 2:43 AM, <greened at obbligato.org> wrote: >> The document here explains pretty well how to add a buildslave to the >> buildbot: >> >> http://llvm.org/docs/HowToAddABuilder.html >> >> However, it's not clear to me how to add a new build config. I would >> like

...t factory to > work with github and monorepo. > > > > > > * LLVMBuilder (3 bots) > > > * PollyBuilder (3 bots) > > > * LLDBBuilder (6 bots) > > > * SanitizerBuilder (10 bots) > > > * CUDATestsuiteBuilder (1 bot) - depends on > ClangBuilder.getClangBuildFactory > > > * AOSPBuilder (1 bot) - depends on PollyBuilder > > > * AnnotatedBuilder (2 bots) > > > * OpenMPBuilder (2 bots) > > > * FuchsiaBuilder (1 bot) > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Galina > > > > > > > >...

...n zorg? >>> >>> Can you get the desired effect with --with-extra-options=? >> >> Probably, but where do I put that? > > It is a configure argument that specifies extra options to compile > with. For buildbots, it is the extra_configure_args parameter for > getClangBuildFactory (look at examples in builders.py). Right, I get that. Actually I would probably use --enable-werror. Should I create a patch for builders.py to add a new config? Is there a way to map a config so that it only even builds on a certain buildslave? I don't want to burden other builders with m...

...config/builders.py (original) +++ zorg/trunk/buildbot/osuosl/master/config/builders.py Fri Nov 18 13:49:26 2011 @@ -200,14 +200,14 @@ 'slavenames':["kistanova6"], 'builddir':"clang-native-arm-cortex-a9", 'factory' : ClangBuilder.getClangBuildFactory( + stage1_config='Release+Asserts', extra_configure_args=['--build=armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabi', '--host=armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabi', '--targ...

...;>> Can you get the desired effect with --with-extra-options=? >>> >>> Probably, but where do I put that? >> >> It is a configure argument that specifies extra options to compile >> with. For buildbots, it is the extra_configure_args parameter for >> getClangBuildFactory (look at examples in builders.py). > > Right, I get that. Actually I would probably use --enable-werror. > > Should I create a patch for builders.py to add a new config? Yes. Send it to llvm-commits and CC Galina Kistanova. > Is there a way to map a config so that it only even bu...

...: ## Cortex-A9 check-all self-host {'name': "clang-native-arm-cortex-a9-self-host", 'slavenames':["linaro-panda-02"], 'builddir':"clang-native-arm-cortex-a9-self-host", 'factory' : ClangBuilder.getClangBuildFactory( stage1_config='Release+Asserts', stage2_config='Release+Asserts', useTwoStage=True, clean=False, test=False, extra_configure_args=['--build=armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf&...

...carbon-based life form; hence, it may contain repetitions, inaccuracies, logical fallacies and repetitions. On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 5:14 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > Hi Richard, Marco, > > I noticed that you two are the remaining bot owners using the > `getClangBuildFactory` from `ClangBuilder`. All the other bots using > that builder have moved to the new `getClangCMakeBuildFactory`, > including Windows ones. > > Given that they do similar functionalities, I'd like to encourage you > to move to the new factory, so that we can simplify the builder...

On 6 February 2013 16:00, David Tweed <david.tweed at arm.com> wrote: > Looking at the output from the a15 buildbot it looks like you are choosing > to do a "make clean". > I'm not choosing, this is the default "Clang" run. ;) If more people feel inclined to change the Clang build on all buildbots to use CMake / Ninja, I'm up for it, too. Galina, have

Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > I've been working to revive the PPC64 build bots, and succeeded, but > not for the right reasons. There were still bootstrap assertion > failures and other pretty blatant errors. Then we figured out why: > the Clang bootstrapping build bots for Power7 are not actually > running any of the Clang tests! > > Could one

Hey Galina, Will; I've been working to revive the PPC64 build bots, and succeeded, but not for the right reasons. There were still bootstrap assertion failures and other pretty blatant errors. Then we figured out why: the Clang bootstrapping build bots for Power7 are not actually running any of the Clang tests! Could one of you tweak this build bot's configuration to match the other