Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "getchunks".
Did you mean:
getchunk
2018 Jul 25
2
LLD COFF library: crashes when lld::coff::link is called twice
...>::insert<lld::coff::Chunk * __ptr64 const *
__ptr64>(std::_Vector_const_iterator<std::_Vector_val<std::_Simple_types<lld::coff::Chunk
*> > > _Where, lld::coff::Chunk * const * _First, lld::coff::Chunk * const
* _Last) Line 1376 C++
zig.exe!lld::coff::SymbolTable::getChunks() Line 311 C++
zig.exe!`anonymous namespace'::Writer::createSections() Line 340 C++
zig.exe!`anonymous namespace'::Writer::run() Line 288 C++
zig.exe!lld::coff::writeResult() Line 166 C++
zig.exe!lld::coff::LinkerDriver::link(llvm::ArrayRef<char const *>...
2018 Aug 08
2
LLD COFF library: crashes when lld::coff::link is called twice
..._ptr64 const *
>> __ptr64>(std::_Vector_const_iterator<std::_Vector_val<std::_Simple_types<lld::coff::Chunk
>> *> > > _Where, lld::coff::Chunk * const * _First, lld::coff::Chunk * const *
>> _Last) Line 1376 C++
>> zig.exe!lld::coff::SymbolTable::getChunks() Line 311 C++
>> zig.exe!`anonymous namespace'::Writer::createSections() Line 340
>> C++
>> zig.exe!`anonymous namespace'::Writer::run() Line 288 C++
>> zig.exe!lld::coff::writeResult() Line 166 C++
>> zig.exe!lld::coff::LinkerDriv...
2018 Jun 07
2
[lld] ObjFile::createRegular is oblivious of PendingComdat
I encountered a segfault when using lld to cross-compile for Windows
(+MinGW) from Linux. The problem happens with objects built by gcc. The
problem is that ObjFile::CreateRegular considers a PendingComdat to be
valid (and later causes an illegal pointer dereference). The following
patch fixes the crash:
diff --git a/COFF/InputFiles.cpp b/COFF/InputFiles.cpp
index 9e2345b0a..f47d612df 100644
2018 Jun 07
2
[lld] ObjFile::createRegular is oblivious of PendingComdat
Can you upload a reproducer? You can create it using the /linkrepro flag.
Peter
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 2:50 PM, Reid Kleckner via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> GCC does comdats completely differently from the spec. Since you contacted
> me about this off of the mailing list, I started investigating what they
> do, and it is completely different. It's
2019 Jul 16
2
lld-link crash when build openssl with LTO
Yeah, it crashes indeed. I can reproduce the problem locally. Let me see
what is going on.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 9:00 PM Shi, Steven <steven.shi at intel.com> wrote:
> In my previous test case, after add the `-fno-builtin` to clang then
> build, the lld-link still has same crash as below:
>
>
>
> $ make
>
>
2019 Jul 15
2
lld-link crash when build openssl with LTO
Hi Rui,
We met a lld-link crash problem when build 32bits openssl1.0 with LTO in uefi firmware. We narrow down and figure out a simple test case to reproduce this problem as blow. Please advise. Thank you!
$ cat main.c
void TlsDriverEntryPoint ()
{
unsigned char *ret = 0;
const unsigned char cryptopro_ext[17] = {0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,
2019 Jul 16
2
lld-link crash when build openssl with LTO
lld should not crash in this case (so that's a bug that needs fixing), but
setting it aside, did you try adding `-fno-builtin` to clang so that clang
doesn't handle `memcpy` as a built-in function?
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 8:46 PM Shi, Steven <steven.shi at intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Rui,
>
> For the test case in my previous email, if I change the `memcpy` to
> `foobar` in
2019 Jul 16
3
lld-link crash when build openssl with LTO
Usage of the builtin appears independent of LTO, see below.
With any of -fno-builtin, -fno-builtin-memcpy, and -ffreestanding, which
are all typically used to prevent usage of memcpy calls, we still always
get a memcpy builtin in TlsDriverEntryPoint(). I see this even without
-flto (e.g. try with just -emit-llvm).
I guess it is because this memcpy is not coming from the original source,
but
2019 Jul 16
2
lld-link crash when build openssl with LTO
Hi Steven,
One thing I noticed is that you are defining `memcpy`, which clang has an
intrinsic with the same name. Can you try renaming it to a random name,
like `foobar`, to see if the problem still exists?
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:10 AM Shi, Steven <steven.shi at intel.com> wrote:
> I’ve submitted a BZ for this issue as below:
>
>
>
> Bug 42626 - lld-link crash when
2016 May 03
9
[Bug 95251] New: vdpau decoder capabilities: not supported
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95251
Bug ID: 95251
Summary: vdpau decoder capabilities: not supported
Product: Mesa
Version: 11.2
Hardware: Other
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau
Assignee: nouveau at