search for: getannot

Displaying 17 results from an estimated 17 matches for "getannot".

2013 Jun 17
2
[LLVMdev] vmkit java annotations
...ntln("This is " + myParam); } } class TestAnnotationParser { public void parse(Class clazz) throws Exception { Method[] methods = clazz.getMethods(); for (Method method : methods) { if (method.isAnnotationPresent(Red.class)) { Red test = method.getAnnotation(Red.class); String info = test.info(); if ("AWESOME".equals(info)) { System.out.println("info is awesome!"); // try to invoke the method with param method.invoke( Annotated.class...
2013 Jun 17
2
[LLVMdev] vmkit java annotations
...> > class TestAnnotationParser { > public void parse(Class clazz) throws Exception { > Method[] methods = clazz.getMethods(); > > > > for (Method method : methods) { > if (method.isAnnotationPresent(Red.class)) { > Red test = method.getAnnotation(Red.class); > String info = test.info(); > > if ("AWESOME".equals(info)) { > System.out.println("info is awesome!"); > // try to invoke the method with param > method.invoke( >...
2008 May 28
1
[LLVMdev] Asm output while executing
...ear from the error, although I have no clue on how to do it otherwise. If generating the code for its asm output and then for jit execution I get: ********** static llvm::MachineFunction& llvm::MachineFunction::construct(const llvm::Function*, const llvm::TargetMachine&): Assertion `Fn->getAnnotation(MF_AID) == 0 && "Object already exists for this function!"' failed. ********** The code I use: /// The asm code output std::string Err; const llvm::TargetMachineRegistry::entry* MArch = llvm::TargetMachineRegistry::getClosestStaticTargetFor...
2007 Dec 12
0
New version of seqinR released
...The details of the socket connection are no more stored in the slot socket for objects of class seqAcnucWeb: this slot is now deleted. As a consequence, the argument socket in function as.SeqAcnucWeb() has been removed and there is now a new argument socket = "auto" in functions getAnnot(), getFrag(), geyKeyword(), getLocation(), and getSequence(). The default value "auto" means that the details of the socket connection are taken automatically when necessary from the last opened bank. The size of local lists of sequences is reduced by about a third now as compar...
2007 Dec 12
0
New version of seqinR released
...The details of the socket connection are no more stored in the slot socket for objects of class seqAcnucWeb: this slot is now deleted. As a consequence, the argument socket in function as.SeqAcnucWeb() has been removed and there is now a new argument socket = "auto" in functions getAnnot(), getFrag(), geyKeyword(), getLocation(), and getSequence(). The default value "auto" means that the details of the socket connection are taken automatically when necessary from the last opened bank. The size of local lists of sequences is reduced by about a third now as compar...
2013 Jun 17
0
[LLVMdev] vmkit java annotations
...> > class TestAnnotationParser { > public void parse(Class clazz) throws Exception { > Method[] methods = clazz.getMethods(); > > > > for (Method method : methods) { > if (method.isAnnotationPresent(Red.class)) { > Red test = method.getAnnotation(Red.class); > String info = test.info <http://test.info>(); > > if ("AWESOME".equals(info)) { > System.out.println("info is awesome!"); > // try to invoke the method with param >...
2013 Jun 17
0
[LLVMdev] vmkit java annotations
...public void parse(Class clazz) throws Exception { >> Method[] methods = clazz.getMethods(); >> >> >> >> for (Method method : methods) { >> if (method.isAnnotationPresent(Red.class)) { >> Red test = method.getAnnotation(Red.class); >> String info = test.info <http://test.info>(); >> >> if ("AWESOME".equals(info)) { >> System.out.println("info is awesome!"); >> // try to invoke the...
2008 Jun 05
0
[LLVMdev] Using annotation attributes
...{ > > This nicely gets added to the LLVM bitcode in an > @llvm.global.annotations global. Now I had hoped that it'd be easy to extract > a list of functions annotated with my annotation using > > AnnotationManager::getID("annot") > and later on: > function->getAnnotation(AnnotID). > > This does not seem to work, unfortunately. Is this supposed to work in this > way, or am I using the wrong functions? I could of course just try to > manually parse the @llvm.global.annotations constant, but that seems rather > tiresome :-) There is no way to get...
2012 Oct 12
0
[LLVMdev] [Proposal] Annotated assembly output
...standardized markup, like XML (not that I'm that fond of XML)? At a higher level, why not expose an API for iterating over (potentially annotated) tokens which can be programmatically inspected. So what you expose to clients is an AnnotatedAsmTok. Given an AnnotatedAsmTok, they can call "getAnnotation()", or "getRawText()". A textual representation which can be read into this form might be useful, but we should provide the parser. I guess what I think needs a bit more explanation is why you chose to go the "markup" route, instead of a normal programmatic API. Maybe...
2012 Oct 12
2
[LLVMdev] [Proposal] Annotated assembly output
...ttention to the bits and pieces it cares about. > At a higher level, why not expose an API for iterating over > (potentially annotated) tokens which can be programmatically > inspected. So what you expose to clients is an AnnotatedAsmTok. Given > an AnnotatedAsmTok, they can call "getAnnotation()", or > "getRawText()". A textual representation which can be read into this > form might be useful, but we should provide the parser. We could. It's just outside the scope of what we're looking to do on the initial implementation. Note that it does get a bit mor...
2008 Jun 05
5
[LLVMdev] Using annotation attributes
...tate("annot"))) function() { This nicely gets added to the LLVM bitcode in an @llvm.global.annotations global. Now I had hoped that it'd be easy to extract a list of functions annotated with my annotation using AnnotationManager::getID("annot") and later on: function->getAnnotation(AnnotID). This does not seem to work, unfortunately. Is this supposed to work in this way, or am I using the wrong functions? I could of course just try to manually parse the @llvm.global.annotations constant, but that seems rather tiresome :-) Thanks, Bart Coppens
2012 Oct 12
2
[LLVMdev] [Proposal] Annotated assembly output
The following is a brief proposal for annotated assembly (and disassembly) output. Kevin Enderby and I have been discussing this a bit and are interested in getting broader feedback from interested folks. LLVM Rich Assembly Output LLVM's (dis)assembly output is currently very raw. Consumers have limited ability to introspect the instructions' textual representation or to reformat for
2012 Oct 12
3
[LLVMdev] [Proposal] Annotated assembly output
...about. >> >>> At a higher level, why not expose an API for iterating over >>> (potentially annotated) tokens which can be programmatically >>> inspected. So what you expose to clients is an AnnotatedAsmTok. Given >>> an AnnotatedAsmTok, they can call "getAnnotation()", or >>> "getRawText()". A textual representation which can be read into this >>> form might be useful, but we should provide the parser. >> >> We could. It's just outside the scope of what we're looking to do on the initial implementatio...
2012 Oct 12
0
[LLVMdev] [Proposal] Annotated assembly output
...and pieces it cares about. > >> At a higher level, why not expose an API for iterating over >> (potentially annotated) tokens which can be programmatically >> inspected. So what you expose to clients is an AnnotatedAsmTok. Given >> an AnnotatedAsmTok, they can call "getAnnotation()", or >> "getRawText()". A textual representation which can be read into this >> form might be useful, but we should provide the parser. > > We could. It's just outside the scope of what we're looking to do on the initial implementation. Note that it d...
2012 Oct 13
0
[LLVMdev] [Proposal] Annotated assembly output
...>>>> At a higher level, why not expose an API for iterating over >>>> (potentially annotated) tokens which can be programmatically >>>> inspected. So what you expose to clients is an AnnotatedAsmTok. Given >>>> an AnnotatedAsmTok, they can call "getAnnotation()", or >>>> "getRawText()". A textual representation which can be read into this >>>> form might be useful, but we should provide the parser. >>> >>> We could. It's just outside the scope of what we're looking to do on the initia...
2012 Oct 14
1
[LLVMdev] [Proposal] Annotated assembly output
...;> At a higher level, why not expose an API for iterating over >>>>> (potentially annotated) tokens which can be programmatically >>>>> inspected. So what you expose to clients is an AnnotatedAsmTok. Given >>>>> an AnnotatedAsmTok, they can call "getAnnotation()", or >>>>> "getRawText()". A textual representation which can be read into this >>>>> form might be useful, but we should provide the parser. >>>> >>>> We could. It's just outside the scope of what we're looking to...
2011 May 13
0
Wine release 1.3.20
...BaseEffect::GetValue(). d3dx9: Implement ID3DXBaseEffect::GetString(). d3dx9: Implement ID3DXBaseEffect::GetPixelShader(). d3dx9: Implement ID3DXBaseEffect::GetVertexShader(). d3dx9: Implement ID3DXBaseEffect::GetParameterBySemantic(). d3dx9: Implement ID3DXBaseEffect::GetAnnotation(). d3dx9: Implement ID3DXBaseEffect::GetAnnotationByName(). d3dx9: Implement ID3DXBaseEffect::GetDesc() partially. d3dx9: Implement ID3DXBaseEffect::GetBool(). d3dx9: Implement ID3DXBaseEffect::GetInt(). d3dx9: Implement ID3DXBaseEffect::GetFloat(). d3dx9: I...