search for: get_windows_lock_count

...flags2=0x0 mode=0700, access_mask = 0x1, open_access_mask = 0x1 [2008/08/15 12:25:22, 10] smbd/open.c:fd_open(67) fd_open: name jdoe/Application Data/Microsoft/SystemCertificates/My/CRLs, flags = 00 mode = 0700, fd = 32. [2008/08/15 12:25:22, 10] locking/posix.c:get_windows_lock_ref_count(545) get_windows_lock_count for file = 0 [2008/08/15 12:25:22, 10] locking/posix.c:delete_windows_lock_ref_count(559) delete_windows_lock_ref_count for file [2008/08/15 12:25:22, 5] smbd/files.c:file_free(454) freed files structure 5428 (4 used) [2008/08/15 12:25:22, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet_set(106) error packet...

..., 10] lib/dbwrap_tdb.c:db_tdb_record_destr(42) Unlocking key 0BFD0000000000003E85 [2010/02/08 17:18:14, 0] smbd/oplock.c:release_file_oplock(149) PANIC: assert failed at smbd/oplock.c(149): exclusive_oplocks_open>=0 [2010/02/08 17:18:14, 10] locking/posix.c:get_windows_lock_ref_count(495) get_windows_lock_count for file XXXXXXXXXXX = 0 [2010/02/08 17:18:14, 10] locking/posix.c:delete_windows_lock_ref_count(521) delete_windows_lock_ref_count for file XXXXXXXXXXXX [2010/02/08 17:18:14, 2] smbd/close.c:close_normal_file(606) padcube closed file XXXXXXXXXXXX (numopen=2) NT_STATUS_OK [2010/02/08 17:18:14,...

...9 [2008/04/22 14:49:53, 10] smbd/open.c:fd_open(67) fd_open: name opt.err, flags = 00 mode = 0744, fd = 26. [2008/04/22 14:49:53, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(391) marcin opened file opt.err read=Yes write=No (numopen=1) [2008/04/22 14:49:53, 10] locking/posix.c:get_windows_lock_ref_count(545) get_windows_lock_count for file opt.err = 0 [2008/04/22 14:49:53, 10] locking/posix.c:delete_windows_lock_ref_count(559) delete_windows_lock_ref_count for file opt.err [2008/04/22 14:49:53, 5] smbd/files.c:file_free(454) freed files structure 7191 (0 used) [2008/04/22 14:49:53, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet_set(106)...

...623) parse_share_modes: share_mode_entry[2]: UNUSED pid = 7567, share_access = 0x3, private_options = 0x40, access_mask = 0x20089, mid = 0x0, type= 0x40, file_id = 353, uid = 20286, flags = 0, dev = 0xc733, inode = 818481 [2008/04/16 12:16:21, 10] locking/posix.c:get_windows_lock_ref_count(545) get_windows_lock_count for file LSP-Current-User-Data/smuhammad/55620_Saver/55620_saver.exe = 0 [2008/04/16 12:16:21, 10] locking/posix.c:delete_windows_lock_ref_count(559) delete_windows_lock_ref_count for file LSP-Current-User-Data/smuhammad/55620_Saver/55620_saver.exe [2008/04/16 12:16:21, 2] smbd/close.c:close_norm...

...2/05/11 11:29:41.979879, 10] modules/gpfs.c:77(set_gpfs_sharemode) am=0, allow=0, sa=0, deny=0 [2012/05/11 11:29:41.979927, 10] modules/gpfs.c:87(set_gpfs_sharemode) gpfs_set_share failed: Operation not permitted [2012/05/11 11:29:41.979971, 10] locking/posix.c:516(get_windows_lock_ref_count) get_windows_lock_count for file New Text Document.txt = 0 [2012/05/11 11:29:41.980015, 10] locking/posix.c:542(delete_windows_lock_ref_count) delete_windows_lock_ref_count for file New Text Document.txt [2012/05/11 11:29:41.980063, 5] smbd/files.c:464(file_free) freed files structure 9705 (2 used) [2012/05/11 11:29:...

I'm running Samba 3.4.7 on Ubuntu 10.04. This is a recent upgrade and we've starting experience a sporadic problem after this upgrade. When users are browsing through Windows Explorer they sometimes run across folders that appear as unassociated files. This requires the user to click the 'Refresh' button in Windows Explorer to properly see the folders. The files and folders are

...c_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2008/05/16 10:49:02, 10] smbd/oplock_linux.c:linux_release_kernel_oplock(191) linux_release_kernel_oplock: file user_v7.exe, dev = fd08, inode = 21205163 file_id = 55 has kernel oplock state of 1. [2008/05/16 10:49:02, 10] locking/posix.c:get_windows_lock_ref_count(545) get_windows_lock_count for file user_v7.exe = 0 [2008/05/16 10:49:02, 10] locking/posix.c:delete_windows_lock_ref_count(559) delete_windows_lock_ref_count for file user_v7.exe [2008/05/16 10:49:02, 4] smbd/dosmode.c:set_filetime(604) set_filetime(user_v7.exe) failed: No such file or directory [2008/05/16 10:49:0...

Hello, I have a question because POSIX ACL with SMB2 max protocol does not work properly.Did you test VFS xattr acls with SMB2 max protocol? Is it working corectly? Best regards/Adrian Berlin --