search for: get_target_properti

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > Chris Bieneman is probably your best bet, and maybe also Dan Liew. > Hans, My current, and hopefully final, revision of the proposed patch is simplified and reworked to solve the problem entirely from cmake without touching the the llvm-build python scripts. Basically, the new fix for avoiding the

> Run it through its phases and report any bugs you find! [ 1495s] CMake Warning (dev) at projects/dragonegg/CMakeLists.txt:34 (get_target_property): [ 1495s] Policy CMP0026 is not set: Disallow use of the LOCATION target property. [ 1495s] Run "cmake --help-policy CMP0026" for policy details. Use the cmake_policy [ 1495s] command to set the policy and suppress this warning. [

On 11/14/2017, 01:26 AM, Chris Bieneman wrote: > Sorry for the delayed response. I've been out of town a lot lately. > > The documentation you referenced is unfortunately out of date (you might notice it still references autoconf). I'll see if I can find time to update it, but the guidance should be to use the `llvm_config` CMake function instead. The proper usage of that in the

Hi, In SUSE we have recently switched from building LLVM as multiple shared libraries (using BUILD_SHARED_LIBS) to building it as a single shared library (using LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB). The multiple shared libraries build was causing issues and apparently it is only meant for LLVM developers. Our guidelines prohibit linking against static libraries unless there is no other option. After this

Over the past few years the LLVM CMake build system has gained a lot of new features, which have powered new workflows and capabilities. This development has largely been individual efforts without focus or long-term direction. The build system is of incredible importance to LLVM as it is a primary interface for contributors to build and test their changes. This year, LLVM is making a huge

> On Oct 24, 2019, at 02:17, Alex Denisov via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > This is a great initiative and it feels like the right direction. > > I'd like to add another point to the list: using LLVM as a library, i.e. being able to add it as a CMake subproject. > Currently it works pretty good, but some parts can be improved

Hans, I have posted a complete patch for solving the linkage issues with LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB on Phabricator at http://reviews.llvm.org/D16945. The bulk of the fix the simple changes of... Index: cmake/modules/AddLLVM.cmake =================================================================== --- cmake/modules/AddLLVM.cmake (revision 259743) +++ cmake/modules/AddLLVM.cmake (working copy) @@

Sorry for the delay in writing this up and sending it out, but I wanted to recap the discussion from the roundtable on October 23rd. The roundtable ran for almost two hours and we discussed at most of the main points in my RFC. Thank you everyone who participated and contributed to the discussion! TL;DR: We should move to CMake 3.15 (RFC incoming). We should make `all` really `all`. We should

Speaking on how to locate/enable projects (like clang/lldb) - even with the monorepo, I'm still enabling clang/lldb by symlinking them into llvm/tools, for one specific reason: CMake and relative paths. As long as all the source that is being built is below the toplevel CMake directory, and the build directory itself is within the toplevel CMake project directory, CMake uses relative