search for: get_set

...t; > [added CCs since it affects bridge code] > > > If I read this correctly, the EIP in the last line corresponds to > > net/bridge/br_if.c, line 36: > > > > static int port_cost(struct net_device *dev) > > { > > if (dev->ethtool_ops->get_settings) { > > ^^^^ > > > > As far as I can figure out, dev->ethtool_ops is NULL and the crash > > happens while trying to derefernce ...->get_settings. > > > > Is dev->ethtool_ops allowed to be NULL? In this case the appen...

pleas help -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...l duplex > to ethtool, as veth does? > > Creating a magic whitelist of devices deep inside the 802.3ad > implementation seems less desirable. > TBH, I absolutely agree. In fact here's what we've been doing: add set_settings which allows the user to set any speed/duplex and get_settings of course to retrieve that. This is also useful for testing other stuff that requires speed and duplex, not only for the bonding case. I'll add the virtio_net maintainers to the discussion, see if it's okay with everyone and I'll move to send patches once net-next opens up. Thank...

...l duplex > to ethtool, as veth does? > > Creating a magic whitelist of devices deep inside the 802.3ad > implementation seems less desirable. > TBH, I absolutely agree. In fact here's what we've been doing: add set_settings which allows the user to set any speed/duplex and get_settings of course to retrieve that. This is also useful for testing other stuff that requires speed and duplex, not only for the bonding case. I'll add the virtio_net maintainers to the discussion, see if it's okay with everyone and I'll move to send patches once net-next opens up. Thank...

...rve a User class, but I can''t get this to work, the after_create method never gets called... (the breakpoint never gets called) app/models/user_observer.rb: class UserObserver < ActiveRecord::Observer def after_create(user) breakpoint setting = get_setting(''sys_notify_enable_user_create'') if setting? then AdminMailer.deliver_simple_monitor_alert(''Se ha creado un nuevusuario'', "Nombre: #{user.name} \nCorreo: #{user.email} \nDetalle: #{user.detail} ")...

...>> Creating a magic whitelist of devices deep inside the 802.3ad >>> implementation seems less desirable. >>> >> TBH, I absolutely agree. In fact here's what we've been doing: >> add set_settings which allows the user to set any speed/duplex >> and get_settings of course to retrieve that. This is also useful >> for testing other stuff that requires speed and duplex, not only >> for the bonding case. > > I also agree. Having a whitelist is just rediculous. > > There should be a default speed/duplex setting for such devices a...

...>> Creating a magic whitelist of devices deep inside the 802.3ad >>> implementation seems less desirable. >>> >> TBH, I absolutely agree. In fact here's what we've been doing: >> add set_settings which allows the user to set any speed/duplex >> and get_settings of course to retrieve that. This is also useful >> for testing other stuff that requires speed and duplex, not only >> for the bonding case. > > I also agree. Having a whitelist is just rediculous. > > There should be a default speed/duplex setting for such devices a...

...0) diversified results. Note: k = 20 and N = 100 are suitable as usually users don't page too far and even if they do, it's suitable to let the results tail off in relevance. The above procedure can be included in the pipeline of producing the final results by wrapping Xapian::Mset Matcher::get_set(..). The algorithm requires top-N document vectors and their relevant scores, which are readily available. This gives a complete diversification implementation, although it being quite slow. 2) Optimising GLS-MPT: One of the main contributions of the paper is optimising GLS-MPT. It involves cluste...

...> > > Thanks, > > Uppinder Chugh > > > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 2:14 AM, Uppinder Chugh <uppinderchugh at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> In particular, I have the following doubts: > >> > >> a) Is wrapping Xapian::Mset matcher::get_set(..) suitable in this > scenario and with the api? Also, how can I allow the user to manually allow > diversification while he configures his result set via Matcher API? > >> > >> b) Should I include the LC clustering algorithm in xapian-core/cluster > (as there's the...

...v(dev); + u32 speed = ethtool_cmd_speed(cmd); + + /* don't allow custom speed and duplex */ + if (!virtnet_validate_speed(speed) || + !virtnet_validate_duplex(cmd->duplex)) + return -EINVAL; + vi->speed = speed; + vi->duplex = cmd->duplex; + + return 0; +} + +static int virtnet_get_settings(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_cmd *cmd) +{ + struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev); + + ethtool_cmd_speed_set(cmd, vi->speed); + cmd->duplex = vi->duplex; + + return 0; +} + +static void virtnet_init_settings(struct net_device *dev) +{ + struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_...

...v(dev); + u32 speed = ethtool_cmd_speed(cmd); + + /* don't allow custom speed and duplex */ + if (!virtnet_validate_speed(speed) || + !virtnet_validate_duplex(cmd->duplex)) + return -EINVAL; + vi->speed = speed; + vi->duplex = cmd->duplex; + + return 0; +} + +static int virtnet_get_settings(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_cmd *cmd) +{ + struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev); + + ethtool_cmd_speed_set(cmd, vi->speed); + cmd->duplex = vi->duplex; + + return 0; +} + +static void virtnet_init_settings(struct net_device *dev) +{ + struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_...

...ex */ >> + if (!virtnet_validate_speed(speed) || >> + !virtnet_validate_duplex(cmd->duplex)) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + vi->speed = speed; >> + vi->duplex = cmd->duplex; >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int virtnet_get_settings(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_cmd *cmd) >> +{ >> + struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev); >> + >> + ethtool_cmd_speed_set(cmd, vi->speed); >> + cmd->duplex = vi->duplex; >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static...

...ex */ >> + if (!virtnet_validate_speed(speed) || >> + !virtnet_validate_duplex(cmd->duplex)) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + vi->speed = speed; >> + vi->duplex = cmd->duplex; >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int virtnet_get_settings(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_cmd *cmd) >> +{ >> + struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev); >> + >> + ethtool_cmd_speed_set(cmd, vi->speed); >> + cmd->duplex = vi->duplex; >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static...

...th does? >> >> Creating a magic whitelist of devices deep inside the 802.3ad >> implementation seems less desirable. >> > TBH, I absolutely agree. In fact here's what we've been doing: > add set_settings which allows the user to set any speed/duplex > and get_settings of course to retrieve that. This is also useful > for testing other stuff that requires speed and duplex, not only > for the bonding case. I also agree. Having a whitelist is just rediculous. There should be a default speed/duplex setting for such devices as well. We can pick one that...

...!ethtool_validate_duplex(cmd->duplex) || + !ethtool_validate_duplex(cmd->base.duplex) || !virtnet_validate_ethtool_cmd(cmd)) return -EINVAL; vi->speed = speed; - vi->duplex = cmd->duplex; + vi->duplex = cmd->base.duplex; return 0; } -static int virtnet_get_settings(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_cmd *cmd) +static int virtnet_get_link_ksettings(struct net_device *dev, + struct ethtool_link_ksettings *cmd) { struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev); - ethtool_cmd_speed_set(cmd, vi->speed); - cmd->duplex = vi->duplex; - cmd-...

...!ethtool_validate_duplex(cmd->duplex) || + !ethtool_validate_duplex(cmd->base.duplex) || !virtnet_validate_ethtool_cmd(cmd)) return -EINVAL; vi->speed = speed; - vi->duplex = cmd->duplex; + vi->duplex = cmd->base.duplex; return 0; } -static int virtnet_get_settings(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_cmd *cmd) +static int virtnet_get_link_ksettings(struct net_device *dev, + struct ethtool_link_ksettings *cmd) { struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev); - ethtool_cmd_speed_set(cmd, vi->speed); - cmd->duplex = vi->duplex; - cmd-...

...!ethtool_validate_duplex(cmd->duplex) || + !ethtool_validate_duplex(cmd->base.duplex) || !virtnet_validate_ethtool_cmd(cmd)) return -EINVAL; vi->speed = speed; - vi->duplex = cmd->duplex; + vi->duplex = cmd->base.duplex; return 0; } -static int virtnet_get_settings(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_cmd *cmd) +static int virtnet_get_link_ksettings(struct net_device *dev, + struct ethtool_link_ksettings *cmd) { struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev); - ethtool_cmd_speed_set(cmd, vi->speed); - cmd->duplex = vi->duplex; - cmd-...

...!ethtool_validate_duplex(cmd->duplex) || + !ethtool_validate_duplex(cmd->base.duplex) || !virtnet_validate_ethtool_cmd(cmd)) return -EINVAL; vi->speed = speed; - vi->duplex = cmd->duplex; + vi->duplex = cmd->base.duplex; return 0; } -static int virtnet_get_settings(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_cmd *cmd) +static int virtnet_get_link_ksettings(struct net_device *dev, + struct ethtool_link_ksettings *cmd) { struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev); - ethtool_cmd_speed_set(cmd, vi->speed); - cmd->duplex = vi->duplex; - cmd-...

.../* don't allow custom speed and duplex */ > + if (!virtnet_validate_speed(speed) || > + !virtnet_validate_duplex(cmd->duplex)) > + return -EINVAL; > + vi->speed = speed; > + vi->duplex = cmd->duplex; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int virtnet_get_settings(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_cmd *cmd) > +{ > + struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev); > + > + ethtool_cmd_speed_set(cmd, vi->speed); > + cmd->duplex = vi->duplex; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static void virtnet_init_settings(struct net_d...

...esce *ec) +{ + struct tun_struct *tun = netdev_priv(dev); + + if (ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames > NAPI_POLL_WEIGHT) + tun->rx_batched = NAPI_POLL_WEIGHT; + else + tun->rx_batched = ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames; + + return 0; +} + static const struct ethtool_ops tun_ethtool_ops = { .get_settings = tun_get_settings, .get_drvinfo = tun_get_drvinfo, @@ -2445,6 +2507,8 @@ static const struct ethtool_ops tun_ethtool_ops = { .set_msglevel = tun_set_msglevel, .get_link = ethtool_op_get_link, .get_ts_info = ethtool_op_get_ts_info, + .get_coalesce = tun_get_coalesce, + .set_coalesce...