search for: get_rule_prefix

I received the following bug report for the Debian rsync package today. I wouldn't have expected 2.6.4 to refuse to talk to even a 2.6.2 in this way... Perhaps Wayne could comment? Paul Slootman On Tue 26 Apr 2005, Alexey Feldgendler wrote: > > Rsync fails to push filters to the the remote host if the remote rsync > is older than the Debian's. I've tried to connect to a

...y source file extern unsigned int curr_dir_len; ^ exclude.c(44): remark #1419: external declaration in primary source file extern unsigned int module_dirlen; ^ exclude.c(128): remark #981: operands are evaluated in unspecified order who_am_i(), get_rule_prefix(mflags, pat, 0, NULL), ^ exclude.c(127): remark #981: operands are evaluated in unspecified order rprintf(FINFO, "[%s] add_rule(%s%.*s%s)%s\n", ^ exclude.c(1027): remark #810: conversion from "int" to "char" may lose significant bits *s...