search for: get_pc_thunk

...ed, ran "make install; make samples", then started asterisk with "asterisk -vvvvc". Several modules refused to load giving this error: [chan_sip.so]May 22 13:48:41 WARNING[4308]: loader.c:258 ast_load_resource: /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/chan_sip.so: undefined symbol: __i686.get_pc_thunk.dx May 22 13:48:41 WARNING[4308]: loader.c:440 load_modules: Loading module chan_sip.so failed! I noload''ed 4 modules and asterisk now runs, but without SIP support, it''s kind of lame. I didn''t watch the console the whole time it was compiling, so I didn''t s...

...e: libglib2.0-dev (>= 2.2.3), libreadline5-dev, comerr-dev, uuid-dev, libblkid-dev (>= 1.36), debhelper (>= 3.0.5) Building ocfs2-tools fails with an error on building fsck.ocfs2: /usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a(elf-init.oS)(.gnu.linkonce.t.__i686.get_pc_thu nk.bx+0x0): In function `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx': : multiple definition of `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx' ../libocfs2/libocfs2.a(alloc.o)(.gnu.linkonce.t.__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx+0 x0): first defined here collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [fsck.ocfs2] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/ocfs2-tools-1.2.1/fsck.ocfs...

...../../xenstore -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE -Wp,-MD,.blktapctrl.d -o blktapctrl -L. -L.. -L../lib -L../../../tools/libxc -lblktap -lcrypto -lz -L../../../tools/xenstore -lxenstore blktapctrl.c /usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a(elf-init.oS)(.text.__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx+0x0): In function `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx'': : multiple definition of `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx'' /tmp/ccOyfIDQ.o(.gnu.linkonce.t.__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx+0x0):/root/xen-unstable/tools/blktap/drivers/blktapctrl.c:76: first defined here collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *...

On Monday 04 January 2010 05:16:40 Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: > On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Jon Harrop <jon at ffconsultancy.com> wrote: > > LLVM's TCO already handles mutual recursion. > > Only for fastcc functions Yes. > compiled with -tailcallopt, right? If you use the compiler, yes. > http://llvm.org/docs/CodeGenerator.html#tailcallopt > > I believe

On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Jon Harrop <jon at ffconsultancy.com> wrote: > On Monday 04 January 2010 03:33:06 Simon Harris wrote: >> On 04/01/2010, at 3:01 PM, Jon Harrop wrote: >> > I am certainly interested in tail calls because my HLVM project relies >> > upon LLVM's tail call elimination. However, I do not understand what tail >> > calls LLVM

...LLVMCore.a[AsmWriter.o]: __assert __clzdi2 __udivdi3 __umoddi3 _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ _ZdaPv _ZdlPv -bash-3.2$ /usr/bin/nm -p -g `find . -name libLLVMCore.a` | head ./Debug/lib/libLLVMCore.a[AsmWriter.o]: 0000000000 U __assert 0000000000 U __clzdi2 0000000000 T __i686.get_pc_thunk.bx 0000000000 T __i686.get_pc_thunk.cx 0000000000 U __udivdi3 0000000000 U __umoddi3 0000000000 U _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ -bash-3.2$ /opt/gcc4/bin/nm -p -g `find . -name libLLVMCore.a` | head AsmWriter.o: 00000000 T __i686.get_pc_thunk.cx U _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ 00000000 W _ZnwjPv 00000000...

...8== ABORTING My guess is that this is caused by the following code being moved to a branch island: Dump of assembler code for function __cxa_throw: 0x00008f60 <__cxa_throw+0>: push %esi 0x00008f61 <__cxa_throw+1>: push %ebx 0x00008f62 <__cxa_throw+2>: call 0x7a60 <__x86.get_pc_thunk.bx> Perhaps this makes __x86.get_pc_thunk.bx return an incorrect value. Since libstdc++-v3 is built together with gcc, the two issues related to instructions being moved to another place can be solved by padding __cxa_throw() with five NOP instructions (enough to hold a JMP). I believe this sh...

...40.5022 libglib-2.0.so.0.1400.5 g_list_remove 23072 5.0993 libswfdec-0.5.so.5.0.0 swfdec_ring_buffer_peek_nth 15098 3.3369 libgobject-2.0.so.0.1400.5 g_type_check_instance_cast 12670 2.8003 no-vmlinux (no symbols) 10694 2.3636 libgobject-2.0.so.0.1400.5 __i686.get_pc_thunk.bx 10001 2.2104 libswfdec-0.5.so.5.0.0 swfdec_player_iterate 7779 1.7193 libswfdec-0.5.so.5.0.0 __i686.get_pc_thunk.bx 7624 1.6850 libswfdec-0.5.so.5.0.0 swfdec_movie_find 6825 1.5084 libglib-2.0.so.0.1400.5 g_hash_table_lookup 6611 1.4611 libswfdec-0.5.so.5.0.0...

...t this is caused by the following code being moved to a > branch island: > > Dump of assembler code for function __cxa_throw: > 0x00008f60 <__cxa_throw+0>: push %esi > 0x00008f61 <__cxa_throw+1>: push %ebx > 0x00008f62 <__cxa_throw+2>: call 0x7a60 <__x86.get_pc_thunk.bx> > > Perhaps this makes __x86.get_pc_thunk.bx return an incorrect value. > > Since libstdc++-v3 is built together with gcc, the two issues related > to instructions being moved to another place can be solved by padding > __cxa_throw() with five NOP instructions (enough to ho...

...ing code being moved to a > > branch island: > > > > Dump of assembler code for function __cxa_throw: > > 0x00008f60 <__cxa_throw+0>: push %esi > > 0x00008f61 <__cxa_throw+1>: push %ebx > > 0x00008f62 <__cxa_throw+2>: call 0x7a60 <__x86.get_pc_thunk.bx> > > > > Perhaps this makes __x86.get_pc_thunk.bx return an incorrect value. > > > > Since libstdc++-v3 is built together with gcc, the two issues related > > to instructions being moved to another place can be solved by padding > > __cxa_throw() with five...

.../usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 2033 100.000 (no location information) qemu-system-x86_64 /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 [self] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1925 0.2650 (no location information) libdrm_nouveau.so.2.0.0 __x86.get_pc_thunk.si 1925 100.000 (no location information) libdrm_nouveau.so.2.0.0 __x86.get_pc_thunk.si [self] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1765 0.2430 (no location information) nouveau /nouveau 1765 100.000 (no location i...

...;X86CompilationCallback_SSE+16>: mov %ebx,-0xc(%ebp) 0xb74b98f3 <X86CompilationCallback_SSE+19>: mov %edi,-0x4(%ebp) 0xb74b98f6 <X86CompilationCallback_SSE+22>: lea 0x40(%esi),%edi 0xb74b98f9 <X86CompilationCallback_SSE+25>: call 0xb7315577 <__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx> 0xb74b98fe <X86CompilationCallback_SSE+30>: add $0x76d71e,%ebx 0xb74b9904 <X86CompilationCallback_SSE+36>: mov %eax,(%edi) 0xb74b9906 <X86CompilationCallback_SSE+38>: mov %edx,0x4(%edi) 0xb74b9909 <X86CompilationCallback_SSE+41>: mov %ecx,0...

...ing code being moved to a > > branch island: > > > > Dump of assembler code for function __cxa_throw: > > 0x00008f60 <__cxa_throw+0>: push %esi > > 0x00008f61 <__cxa_throw+1>: push %ebx > > 0x00008f62 <__cxa_throw+2>: call 0x7a60 <__x86.get_pc_thunk.bx> > > > > Perhaps this makes __x86.get_pc_thunk.bx return an incorrect value. > > > > Since libstdc++-v3 is built together with gcc, the two issues related > > to instructions being moved to another place can be solved by padding > > __cxa_throw() with five...

...> > branch island: > > > > > > Dump of assembler code for function __cxa_throw: > > > 0x00008f60 <__cxa_throw+0>: push %esi > > > 0x00008f61 <__cxa_throw+1>: push %ebx > > > 0x00008f62 <__cxa_throw+2>: call 0x7a60 <__x86.get_pc_thunk.bx> > > > > > > Perhaps this makes __x86.get_pc_thunk.bx return an incorrect value. > > > > > > Since libstdc++-v3 is built together with gcc, the two issues related > > > to instructions being moved to another place can be solved by padding > >...

Hi all, I've encountered a couple of minor build issues on Solaris that have crept in since 2.5, fixes below: 1. In lib/Target/X86/X86JITInfo.cpp, there is: // Check if building with -fPIC #if defined(__PIC__) && __PIC__ && defined(__linux__) #define ASMCALLSUFFIX "@PLT" #else #define ASMCALLSUFFIX #endif Which causes a link failure due to the non-PLT

...a >> > branch island: >> > >> > Dump of assembler code for function __cxa_throw: >> > 0x00008f60 <__cxa_throw+0>: push %esi >> > 0x00008f61 <__cxa_throw+1>: push %ebx >> > 0x00008f62 <__cxa_throw+2>: call 0x7a60 <__x86.get_pc_thunk.bx> >> > >> > Perhaps this makes __x86.get_pc_thunk.bx return an incorrect value. >> > >> > Since libstdc++-v3 is built together with gcc, the two issues related >> > to instructions being moved to another place can be solved by padding >> >...

...> > > > > > > > Dump of assembler code for function __cxa_throw: > > > > 0x00008f60 <__cxa_throw+0>: push %esi > > > > 0x00008f61 <__cxa_throw+1>: push %ebx > > > > 0x00008f62 <__cxa_throw+2>: call 0x7a60 <__x86.get_pc_thunk.bx> > > > > > > > > Perhaps this makes __x86.get_pc_thunk.bx return an incorrect value. > > > > > > > > Since libstdc++-v3 is built together with gcc, the two issues related > > > > to instructions being moved to another place can be so...

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16076 Summary: http://www.dailymotion.com Product: swfdec Version: git Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) URL: http://www.dailymotion.com OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: library AssignedTo: swfdec at

...71 2.6935 parse_body_add_block And after (about four times smaller samples, but shows everything): samples % symbol name 9595 26.2625 parse_next_body_to_boundary 8247 22.5729 parse_body_add_block 772 2.1130 .plt 672 1.8393 buffer_write 658 1.8010 __i686.get_pc_thunk.bx 614 1.6806 safe_memset 586 1.6039 pool_alloconly_malloc 559 1.5300 p_strdup 533 1.4589 hash_table_insert_node I wonder why You use loops instead strlen, which is optimalised on every platforms. Redgards, Len7hir

...It only happens on Centos4, and only on ia-32 machines. In an act of desparation I disassembled the bit of code that's segfaulting and got this: (gdb) disass Dump of assembler code for function _ZN14__gnu_internal10get_globalEv: 0x08579614 <...get_globalEv+0>: call 0x8577c3e <__i686.get_pc_thunk.cx> 0x08579619 <...get_globalEv+5>: add $0x3b31c7,%ecx 0x0857961f <...get_globalEv+11>: push %ebp 0x08579620 <...get_globalEv+12>: mov $0xfffffff8,%eax 0x08579626 <...get_globalEv+18>: mov %esp,%ebp 0x08579628 <...get_globalEv+20>: pop %ebp 0x08579629...