search for: get_noise

...really helped users to > improve the quality of their input, as they could clearly and > immediately see the effect of changes in the environment. > These data are now private and can't easily be extracted from an outside > program. Would it be possible to add _ctl calls to GET_PS, GET_NOISE, > GET_SNR etc? Would you accept patches which did this? One of the main reasons the struct is now private is that its content depends on whether Speex was compiled for fixed-point or floating-point. I'm not against making it possible to extract some information, but it needs to be done in...

...s and noise. This really helped users to improve the quality of their input, as they could clearly and immediately see the effect of changes in the environment. These data are now private and can't easily be extracted from an outside program. Would it be possible to add _ctl calls to GET_PS, GET_NOISE, GET_SNR etc? Would you accept patches which did this?

Hi everyone, As you may have guess, Speex 1.2 is slowly approaching, though there's still a lot left to do so I can't say how long it'll take. I thought this was the right time to ask if there's anything missing or that can be improved to make 1.2 better. At this point, it can't be anything major, but there are still some changes that are possible, e.g: - Improving some