search for: get_metadata

...: 834 Error opening No record at -1: Error opening: No such file or directory Executing get_next() function... tracknum: 834 Executing get_lineno() function... start: 834 Exiting get_lineno, end: 679 Playing /downloads/mp3s/Underworld/Underworld - Rez.mp3 // This is track 834 in the db Executing get_metadata function - tracknum 679 Mounted on http://localhost:8000/ices Executing get_metadata function - tracknum 679 forcing to the next track (SIGUSR1), the following is displayed on the console: Executing get_next() function... tracknum: 679 Executing get_lineno() function... start: 679 Exiting get_lin...

...match the current configuration, >> > so it's not as dynamic as the above. >> >> Well, the configuration needs to be somewhere. Would it make sense to >> from a performance point of view to be looking up foo_tag_term in >> document metadata? > > Calling get_metadata() is pretty much exactly equivalent to reading the > synonyms for a term - both read one Btree entry, just from different > tables. Just this morning I realized any lookup would happen during query parsing, which seems pretty unlikely to be a bottleneck. d

...01 seconds. > > > This is because in that case we can just stop once we've found 200 > > > matches. With a few million documents, that ENQ_ASCENDING sounds promising :) So, it looks like if I had ideal ordering, I could do something along the lines of: my $doc_id = $db->get_metadata('last_doc_id') || 0xffffffff; $db->replace_document($doc_id--, $_) foreach (@doc); $db->set_metadata('last_doc_id', $doc_id); And get killer performance. Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 12:58:19AM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > &gt...

Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> writes: > A better option for this is probably a FieldProcessor - you set one for > a prefix and the it gets passed the value and returns a Query object > for it. E.g. in lua (where you can just pass an anon function for the > FieldProcessor - we ought to support C++11 lambdas for such things): [snip] > To achieve this with synonyms in a

...e synonyms in the database to match the current configuration, > > so it's not as dynamic as the above. > > Well, the configuration needs to be somewhere. Would it make sense to > from a performance point of view to be looking up foo_tag_term in > document metadata? Calling get_metadata() is pretty much exactly equivalent to reading the synonyms for a term - both read one Btree entry, just from different tables. Longer term, I wonder if synonyms should happen via FieldProcessor - that would neatly deal with how to do synonyms for different fields in a flexible way, and also allow...

...don't have to wait for your listeners to catch up, you can start storing your music as vorbis now. ices even parses vorbis comments for title streaming. * Proper FIFO handling - including reencoding. The only thing you lack (obviously) is ID3 parsing. * A new function for the playlists, get_metadata, which lets playlists set the title stream for each track if, say, you have better information in a database than in your ID3s. Also you no longer are required to define any functions but get_next. * If ices receives SIGUSR1 it will skip to the next track in the playlist. * Build system imp...

...bug//usr/bin/doveadm...done. done. (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/bin/doveadm search -u email at example.com mailbox Junk savedbefore 30d Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () (gdb) where #0 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #1 0x00007ffff76ef1b5 in mailbox_get_metadata (box=box at entry=0x5555557e1c70, items=items at entry=MAILBOX_METADATA_GUID, metadata_r=metadata_r at entry=0x7fffffffe2f0) at mail-storage.c:1544 #2 0x0000555555570918 in cmd_search_box (info=<optimized out>, ctx=0x5555557c8230) at doveadm-mail-search.c:28 #3 cmd_search_run (c...

I decided to make a few shell scripts that can be used to connect to icecast, decode/reencode a stream, and then send the result back to icecast. I guess this can be done with liveice, but this seemed like a simpler solution for my needs. I have it triggered by a cgi script that i click on when at work and want to listen to my tunes at a lower, more reliable bitrate. There are basically

Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 05:21:43PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > > Hello, is there a way to optimize sorting by certain values > > for queries which return a huge amount of results? > [...] > > $enquire->set_sort_by_value_then_relevance(0, 1); > > If you're just wanting the 200 newest, it'll be faster not to

...create_box = 0x7ffff76e5e30 <fail_mailbox_create>, update_box = 0x7ffff76e5e00 <fail_mailbox_update>, delete_box = 0x7ffff76e5dd0 <fail_mailbox_delete>, rename_box = 0x7ffff76e5da0 <fail_mailbox_rename>, get_status = 0x7ffff69d0170 <quota_get_status>, get_metadata = 0x0, set_subscribed = 0x7ffff76e5d30 <fail_mailbox_set_subscribed>, attribute_set = 0x0, attribute_get = 0x0, attribute_iter_init = 0x0, attribute_iter_next = 0x0, attribute_iter_deinit = 0x0, list_index_has_changed = 0x0, list_index_update_sync = 0x0, sync_init = 0x7fff...