search for: get_lppaca

Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "get_lppaca".

2020 Jul 09
4
[PATCH v3 5/6] powerpc/pseries: implement paravirt qspinlocks for SPLPAR
...53 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c > @@ -771,8 +771,12 @@ static void __init pSeries_setup_arch(void) > if (firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_LPAR)) { > vpa_init(boot_cpuid); > > - if (lppaca_shared_proc(get_lppaca())) > + if (lppaca_shared_proc(get_lppaca())) { > static_branch_enable(&shared_processor); > +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS > + pv_spinlocks_init(); > +#endif > + } We could avoid the ifdef with this I think? diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch...
2020 Jul 09
4
[PATCH v3 5/6] powerpc/pseries: implement paravirt qspinlocks for SPLPAR
...53 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c > @@ -771,8 +771,12 @@ static void __init pSeries_setup_arch(void) > if (firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_LPAR)) { > vpa_init(boot_cpuid); > > - if (lppaca_shared_proc(get_lppaca())) > + if (lppaca_shared_proc(get_lppaca())) { > static_branch_enable(&shared_processor); > +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS > + pv_spinlocks_init(); > +#endif > + } We could avoid the ifdef with this I think? diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch...
2020 Jul 09
0
[PATCH v3 5/6] powerpc/pseries: implement paravirt qspinlocks for SPLPAR
...owerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c >> @@ -771,8 +771,12 @@ static void __init pSeries_setup_arch(void) >> if (firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_LPAR)) { >> vpa_init(boot_cpuid); >> >> - if (lppaca_shared_proc(get_lppaca())) >> + if (lppaca_shared_proc(get_lppaca())) { >> static_branch_enable(&shared_processor); >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS >> + pv_spinlocks_init(); >> +#endif >> + } > We could avoid the ifdef with this I think? > > diff --git a/arch...
2020 Jul 02
0
[PATCH 6/8] powerpc/pseries: implement paravirt qspinlocks for SPLPAR
...up.c index 2db8469e475f..747a203d9453 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c @@ -771,8 +771,12 @@ static void __init pSeries_setup_arch(void) if (firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_LPAR)) { vpa_init(boot_cpuid); - if (lppaca_shared_proc(get_lppaca())) + if (lppaca_shared_proc(get_lppaca())) { static_branch_enable(&shared_processor); +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS + pv_spinlocks_init(); +#endif + } ppc_md.power_save = pseries_lpar_idle; ppc_md.enable_pmcs = pseries_lpar_enable_pmcs; diff --git a/include/asm-generic/qspi...
2020 Jul 03
0
[PATCH v2 5/6] powerpc/pseries: implement paravirt qspinlocks for SPLPAR
...up.c index 2db8469e475f..747a203d9453 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c @@ -771,8 +771,12 @@ static void __init pSeries_setup_arch(void) if (firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_LPAR)) { vpa_init(boot_cpuid); - if (lppaca_shared_proc(get_lppaca())) + if (lppaca_shared_proc(get_lppaca())) { static_branch_enable(&shared_processor); +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS + pv_spinlocks_init(); +#endif + } ppc_md.power_save = pseries_lpar_idle; ppc_md.enable_pmcs = pseries_lpar_enable_pmcs; diff --git a/include/asm-generic/qspi...
2020 Jul 06
0
[PATCH v3 5/6] powerpc/pseries: implement paravirt qspinlocks for SPLPAR
...up.c index 2db8469e475f..747a203d9453 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c @@ -771,8 +771,12 @@ static void __init pSeries_setup_arch(void) if (firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_LPAR)) { vpa_init(boot_cpuid); - if (lppaca_shared_proc(get_lppaca())) + if (lppaca_shared_proc(get_lppaca())) { static_branch_enable(&shared_processor); +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS + pv_spinlocks_init(); +#endif + } ppc_md.power_save = pseries_lpar_idle; ppc_md.enable_pmcs = pseries_lpar_enable_pmcs; diff --git a/include/asm-generic/qspi...
2020 Jul 06
13
[PATCH v3 0/6] powerpc: queued spinlocks and rwlocks
v3 is updated to use __pv_queued_spin_unlock, noticed by Waiman (thank you). Thanks, Nick Nicholas Piggin (6): powerpc/powernv: must include hvcall.h to get PAPR defines powerpc/pseries: move some PAPR paravirt functions to their own file powerpc: move spinlock implementation to simple_spinlock powerpc/64s: implement queued spinlocks and rwlocks powerpc/pseries: implement paravirt
2020 Jul 06
13
[PATCH v3 0/6] powerpc: queued spinlocks and rwlocks
v3 is updated to use __pv_queued_spin_unlock, noticed by Waiman (thank you). Thanks, Nick Nicholas Piggin (6): powerpc/powernv: must include hvcall.h to get PAPR defines powerpc/pseries: move some PAPR paravirt functions to their own file powerpc: move spinlock implementation to simple_spinlock powerpc/64s: implement queued spinlocks and rwlocks powerpc/pseries: implement paravirt
2020 Jul 03
7
[PATCH v2 0/6] powerpc: queued spinlocks and rwlocks
v2 is updated to account for feedback from Will, Peter, and Waiman (thank you), and trims off a couple of RFC and unrelated patches. Thanks, Nick Nicholas Piggin (6): powerpc/powernv: must include hvcall.h to get PAPR defines powerpc/pseries: move some PAPR paravirt functions to their own file powerpc: move spinlock implementation to simple_spinlock powerpc/64s: implement queued
2020 Jul 24
8
[PATCH v4 0/6] powerpc: queued spinlocks and rwlocks
Updated with everybody's feedback (thanks all), and more performance results. What I've found is I might have been measuring the worst load point for the paravirt case, and by looking at a range of loads it's clear that queued spinlocks are overall better even on PV, doubly so when you look at the generally much improved worst case latencies. I have defaulted it to N even though
2020 Jul 02
12
[PATCH 0/8] powerpc: queued spinlocks and rwlocks
This series adds an option to use queued spinlocks for powerpc, and makes it the default for the Book3S-64 subarch. This effort starts with the generic code so it's very simple but still very performant. There are optimisations that can be made to slowpaths, but I think it's better to attack those incrementally if/when we find things, and try to add the improvements to generic code as